Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Radar Teach and Repeat: Architecture and Initial Field Testing (2409.10491v1)

Published 16 Sep 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) scanning radar has emerged as an alternative to spinning LiDAR for state estimation on mobile robots. Radar's longer wavelength is less affected by small particulates, providing operational advantages in challenging environments such as dust, smoke, and fog. This paper presents Radar Teach and Repeat (RT&R): a full-stack radar system for long-term off-road robot autonomy. RT&R can drive routes reliably in off-road cluttered areas without any GPS. We benchmark the radar system's closed-loop path-tracking performance and compare it to its 3D LiDAR counterpart. 11.8 km of autonomous driving was completed without interventions using only radar and gyro for navigation. RT&R was evaluated on different routes with progressively less structured scene geometry. RT&R achieved lateral path-tracking root mean squared errors (RMSE) of 5.6 cm, 7.5 cm, and 12.1 cm as the routes became more challenging. On the robot we used for testing, these RMSE values are less than half of the width of one tire (24 cm). These same routes have worst-case errors of 21.7 cm, 24.0 cm, and 43.8 cm. We conclude that radar is a viable alternative to LiDAR for long-term autonomy in challenging off-road scenarios. The implementation of RT&R is open-source and available at: https://github.com/utiasASRL/vtr3.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a radar-based teach and repeat system using FMCW radar and gyro integration to enhance autonomous navigation.
  • It employs continuous-time ICP on radar point clouds with advanced false alarm filtering to generate accurate submaps for localization.
  • Field tests yielded lateral RMSE between 5.6 cm and 12.1 cm, demonstrating radar's robustness in challenging, off-road environments.

Radar Teach and Repeat: Architecture and Initial Field Testing

Introduction

The investigation presented in "Radar Teach and Repeat: Architecture and Initial Field Testing" by Qiao et al. provides an exhaustive examination of the capabilities of Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave (FMCW) radar-based systems in autonomous mobile robotics, particularly focusing on state estimation and path-tracking performance in challenging environments. The authors propose and implement a system termed Radar Teach and Repeat (RT{content}R), evaluating its performance against traditional LiDAR-based systems in off-road environments where GPS is unavailable, and environmental factors like dust, smoke, and fog can render vision-based approaches ineffective.

Methodology

The methodological approach of this paper is rooted in the principles of teach and repeat (T{content}R) navigation, wherein the robot is manually driven through a path to create submaps during the 'teach' phase and then autonomously repeats the path during the 'repeat' phase.

In the teach phase, the robot employs continuous-time Iterative Closest Point (ICP) odometry enhanced with gyro integration to construct local submaps linked by odometry. The radar point clouds extracted through a customized Bounded False Alarm Rate (BFAR) detector are transformed into 2D Cartesian coordinates for mapping. This process allows the system to maintain robust localization by mitigating the influence of environmental particulates on radar signals.

In the repeat phase, the system leverages radar-gyro odometry at a lower frequency (4 Hz) and supplements it with high-rate gyro-only odometry updates (100 Hz) to offer more granular control inputs to the model-predictive controller (MPC). Localization is achieved through ICP between live radar scans and stored submap point clouds, enabling accurate path tracking.

Results

The implementation of RT{content}R was evaluated over a series of paths with varying complexity and environmental conditions. The key results include:

  • RT{content}R achieved a lateral RMSE of 5.6 cm, 7.5 cm, and 12.1 cm on progressively more challenging routes, highlighting the system's capability to maintain precision in unstructured environments.
  • GPS-measured path tracking errors showed that radar-based navigation could remain within operationally acceptable bounds, albeit with higher error margins compared to LiDAR-based Teach and Repeat (LT{content}R).
  • RT{content}R demonstrated resilience to environmental artifacts, maintaining performance where LiDAR systems grapple with obstructions like dense fog and smoke.

The paper also presented a comparative analysis between RT{content}R and LT{content}R, noting that while LiDAR-based systems showcased superior path-tracking precision (2.6 cm to 4.7 cm RMSE), radar's robustness in challenging off-road environments renders it a viable alternative.

Discussion

Crucial insights derived from this work are multifaceted. The importance of integrating gyro measurements into the radar odometry pipeline becomes evident, as it significantly reduces angular drift introduced by the limitations of a purely radar-based ICP approach. The authors observe that incorrect lateral position estimates could lead to wider turns, emphasizing the need for enhanced radar point cloud extraction techniques to reduce false-positive points and radial artifacts.

Implications and Future Directions

Practically, the deployment of RT{content}R can significantly expand the operational contexts of autonomous robots, enabling long-term autonomy in environments previously deemed unsuitable for navigation due to visibility challenges. The robust autonomous driving exhibited by RT{content}R suggests potential adoption in sectors like underground mining, agricultural monitoring, and emergency response in environments where visibility is compromised.

Theoretically, the research extends the paradigm of sensor fusion, demonstrating that combining radar with additional sensors (e.g., gyros) can close the gap in performance with traditionally preferred sensors like LiDAR. This approach sets a precedent for future developments involving enhanced radar signal processing, improved point cloud feature extraction, and the incorporation of Doppler correction to further refine odometry estimates, as suggested by contemporary studies.

Conclusion

This investigation underscores radar's viability in enhancing autonomous navigation systems' robustness in adverse environments. Future research will likely explore refining radar feature extraction and incorporating velocity information to optimize state estimation. Such advancements will further bolster the reliability and accuracy of radar-based teach and repeat systems, augmenting their operational scope in the autonomous robotics landscape.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com