Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Adapting Skills to Novel Grasps: A Self-Supervised Approach (2408.00178v1)

Published 31 Jul 2024 in cs.RO and cs.LG

Abstract: In this paper, we study the problem of adapting manipulation trajectories involving grasped objects (e.g. tools) defined for a single grasp pose to novel grasp poses. A common approach to address this is to define a new trajectory for each possible grasp explicitly, but this is highly inefficient. Instead, we propose a method to adapt such trajectories directly while only requiring a period of self-supervised data collection, during which a camera observes the robot's end-effector moving with the object rigidly grasped. Importantly, our method requires no prior knowledge of the grasped object (such as a 3D CAD model), it can work with RGB images, depth images, or both, and it requires no camera calibration. Through a series of real-world experiments involving 1360 evaluations, we find that self-supervised RGB data consistently outperforms alternatives that rely on depth images including several state-of-the-art pose estimation methods. Compared to the best-performing baseline, our method results in an average of 28.5% higher success rate when adapting manipulation trajectories to novel grasps on several everyday tasks. Videos of the experiments are available on our webpage at https://www.robot-learning.uk/adapting-skills

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. E. Valassakis et al., “Demonstrate once, imitate immediately (dome): Learning visual servoing for one-shot imitation learning,” IROS, 2022.
  2. W. Wan, H. Igawa, K. Harada, H. Onda, K. Nagata, and N. Yamanobe, “A regrasp planning component for object reorientation,” Auton. Robots, vol. 43, p. 1101–1115, jun 2019.
  3. A. Nguyen et al., “Preparatory object reorientation for task-oriented grasping,” in IROS, 2016.
  4. S. Cheng, K. Mo, and L. Shao, “Learning to regrasp by learning to place,” CoRR, vol. abs/2109.08817, 2021.
  5. A. Simeonov, Y. Du, A. Tagliasacchi, J. B. Tenenbaum, A. Rodriguez, P. Agrawal, and V. Sitzmann, “Neural descriptor fields: Se(3)-equivariant object representations for manipulation,” ICRA, 2022.
  6. H. Chen et al., “Aspanformer: Detector-free image matching with adaptive span transformer,” ECCV, 2022.
  7. S. Rusinkiewicz et al., “Efficient variants of the icp algorithm,” 3rd Intl. Conf. on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2001.
  8. S. Amir et al., “Deep vit features as dense visual descriptors,” ECCVW What is Motion For?, 2022.
  9. P. R. Florence, L. Manuelli, and R. Tedrake, “Dense object nets: Learning dense visual object descriptors by and for robotic manipulation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08756, 2018.
  10. B. Wen, W. Lian, K. E. Bekris, and S. Schaal, “You only demonstrate once: Category-level manipulation from single visual demonstration,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2201.12716, 2022.
  11. W. Goodwin et al., “You only look at one: Category-level object representations for pose estimation from a single example,” in CoRL, 2023.
  12. X. Deng, Y. Xiang, A. Mousavian, C. Eppner, T. Bretl, and D. Fox, “Self-supervised 6d object pose estimation for robot manipulation,” in ICRA, 2020.
  13. X. Li, H. Wang, L. Yi, L. Guibas, A. L. Abbott, and S. Song, “Category-level articulated object pose estimation,” CVPR, 2020.
  14. S. Devgon et al., “Orienting novel 3d objects using self-supervised learning of rotation transforms,” 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 2020.
  15. H. Yisheng, W. Yao, F. Haoqiang, C. Qifeng, and S. Jian, “Fs6d: Few-shot 6d pose estimation of novel objects,” CVPR, 2022.
  16. 2014.
  17. E. Valassakis, K. Dreczkowski, and E. Johns, “Learning eye-in-hand calibration from a single image,” in CoRL, 2021.
  18. H. Fang et al., “Graspnet-1billion: A large-scale benchmark for general object grasping,” 2020 CVPR, pp. 11441–11450, 2020.
  19. H. Xu, J. Zhang, J. Cai, H. Rezatofighi, F. Yu, D. Tao, and A. Geiger, “Unifying flow, stereo and depth estimation,” 2022.
  20. W. Boerdijk, M. Sundermeyer, M. Durner, and R. Triebel, “Self-supervised object-in-gripper segmentation from robotic motions,” in Conference on Robot Learning, 2020.
  21. E. Johns, “Coarse-to-fine imitation learning: Robot manipulation from a single demonstration,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021.
  22. M. Caron et al., “Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers,” 2021 ICCV), 2021.
  23. K. S. Arun, T. S. Huang, and S. D. Blostein, “Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. PAMI-9, pp. 698–700, 1987.
  24. D. Hadjivelichkov et al., “One-Shot Transfer of Affordance Regions? AffCorrs!,” in CoRL, 2023.
  25. V. Vosylius and E. Johns, “Where to start? collision-free transfer of skills to new environments,” in CoRL, 2022.
  26. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” 2015. cite arxiv:1505.04597Comment: conditionally accepted at MICCAI 2015.
  27. T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. J. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick, “Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, 2014.
  28. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” 2014. cite arxiv:1412.6980Comment: Published as a conference paper at the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, 2015.
  29. R. Liu, J. Lehman, P. Molino, F. P. Such, E. Frank, A. Sergeev, and J. Yosinski, “An intriguing failing of convolutional neural networks and the coordconv solution.,” in NeurIPS, 2018.
  30. H. Zhang, I. Goodfellow, D. Metaxas, and A. Odena, “Self-attention generative adversarial networks,” in arXiv, 2018.
  31. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition,” in CVPR, IEEE, 2016.
  32. C. Finn, X. Y. Tan, Y. Duan, T. Darrell, S. Levine, and P. Abbeel, “Deep spatial autoencoders for visuomotor learning,” in ICRA, 2016.
  33. Q.-Y. Zhou, J. Park, and V. Koltun, “Open3D: A modern library for 3D data processing,” arXiv:1801.09847, 2018.
  34. J. Park, Q.-Y. Zhou, and V. Koltun, “Colored point cloud registration revisited,” in IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 143–152, 2017.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a self-supervised approach that adapts learned manipulation skills to new grasp configurations without human intervention.
  • It leverages a vision-based alignment network trained on RGB data, eliminating the need for prior object knowledge or precise calibrations.
  • Experimental results demonstrate a 28.5% improvement in success rates over conventional depth-based methods in unstructured environments.

Adaptation of Robotic Manipulation Skills to Novel Grasp Poses

The paper, "Adapting Skills to Novel Grasps: A Self-Supervised Approach," addresses the efficient adaptation of robotic manipulation trajectories to novel grasp poses without the conventional need for explicit trajectory definition. The authors propose a self-supervised method that allows a robot to autonomously adjust manipulation skills learned for a single grasp pose to any new grasp configuration. This capability is crucial for practical robotic deployments where various grasp poses can occur due to environmental or interaction variations.

Core Contributions

The central contribution of this research is developing a method that bypasses the usual requirements of prior object knowledge or camera calibration. The proposed method incorporates:

  1. Vision-Based Alignment Network: The authors introduce an alignment network that predicts the corrective transformation required to adapt a skill trajectory to align with novel grasp poses. This network is trained via data collected in a self-supervised manner, requiring only a few minutes of data gathering from robot motions in front of a camera.
  2. Self-Supervised Data Collection: Involving no human intervention, this process allows the robot to autonomously emulate various grasps by manipulating the object with a single known grasp pose. Images captured during this phase form the dataset for training the alignment network.
  3. No Prior Object Knowledge: The method operates without 3D CAD models or object-specific data, making it applicable in unstructured and unknown environments. This aspect highlights the robustness and applicability of the method across different object types.
  4. RGB Image Utilization: The paper demonstrated that self-supervised learning using solely RGB images can outperform depth-based methods, even those relying on advanced pose estimation techniques.

Numerical Results and Analysis

The experiments conducted validated the enhanced adaptability and accuracy of the proposed approach over state-of-the-art methods. The investigation involved real-world tasks such as peg-in-hole insertions and manipulation requiring precision like hammering or spooning, highlighting a 28.5% higher success rate compared to existing techniques. The method demonstrated robust performance even in challenging scenarios with poorly textured or transparent objects, in which conventional depth-based methods generally struggle.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research are significant in terms of both practical applications and theoretical advancements:

  • Practical Impact: The method provides a practical solution for robots in dynamic and unstructured environments, where grasp poses can vary, and explicit pre-programming of every possible scenario is infeasible.
  • Theory and Modelling: This approach contributes to the broader conversation about self-supervised learning in robotics. It underlines the potential of leveraging RGB data, challenging conventional reliance on depth sensing for pose estimation and adaptation.

For future work, extending this method’s capability to encompass dynamic object environments and enhancing its generalization to different object categories without retraining could be explored. Additionally, integrating this method with advanced robotic action models could further broaden its applicability in more complex, real-world tasks.

In conclusion, the presented self-supervised strategy for adapting skills to new grasp poses marks an advancement in making robotic systems more versatile and autonomous in executing precise manipulation tasks across diverse scenarios. The reliance on vision-based self-supervision highlights a step towards more resource-efficient and adaptable robotic systems.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com