Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Modeling Urban Transport Choices: Incorporating Sociocultural Aspects (2407.21307v1)

Published 31 Jul 2024 in cs.MA and stat.AP

Abstract: This paper introduces an agent-based simulation model aimed at understanding urban commuters mode choices and evaluating the impacts of transport policies to promote sustainable mobility. Crafted for developing countries, where utilitarian travel heavily relies on motorcycles, the model integrates sociocultural factors that influence transport behavior. Multinomial models and inferential statistics applied to survey data from Cali, Colombia, inform the model, revealing significant influences of sociodemographic factors and travel attributes on mode choice. Findings highlight the importance of cost, time, safety, comfort, and personal security, with disparities across socioeconomic groups. Policy simulations demonstrate positive responses to interventions like free public transportation, increased bus frequency, and enhanced security, yet with modest shifts in mode choice. Multifaceted policy approaches are deemed more effective, addressing diverse user preferences. Outputs can be extended to cities with similar sociocultural characteristics and transport dynamics. The methodology applied in this work can be replicated for other territories.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. “Calibration of choice model parameters in a transport scenario with heterogeneous traffic conditions and income dependency”. Transportation letters 12(7):441–450.
  2. “Understanding young commuters’ mode choice decision to use private car or public transport from an extended theory of planned behavior”. Transportation Research Record 2675(3):200–211.
  3. Alcaldia/de/Cali 2024. “Documentos de Cali en cifras”. https://www.cali.gov.co/documentos/1705/documentos-de-cali-en-cifras/.
  4. “Mode choice behavior of commuters in Thiruvananthapuram city”. Journal of Transportation Engineering 139(5):494–502.
  5. Bakker, S. 2018. “Electric two-wheelers, sustainable mobility and the city”. Sustainable Cities-Authenticity, Ambition and Dream.
  6. “Gender and Age Differences in the Travel Behavior - A Novi Sad Case Study”. Transportation Research Procedia 14:4324–4333 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.354.
  7. Motorcycling and leisure: Understanding the recreational PTW rider. CRC Press.
  8. “Mapping the Research Landscape for the Motorcycle Market Policies: Sustainability as a Trend—A Systematic Literature Review”. Sustainability 13(19):10813.
  9. Carley, K. 1991. “A theory of group stability”. American sociological review:331–354.
  10. Carley, K. M. 1996. “Validating computational models”. Paper available at http://www. casos. cs. cmu. edu/publications/papers. php.
  11. “What predicts motorcycle ownership, mode choice, and use for utilitarian travel? A literature review”. Transport reviews 43(6):1165–1189.
  12. “Application of the Bass diffusion model for estimating the lifecycle of a retail store”. IJMSOR: International Journal of Management Science & Operation Research 3(1).
  13. Urban Travel Demand. A Behavioral Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  14. “Travel and the built environment. A meta-analysis”. Journal of the American Planning Association 76:265–294 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766.
  15. “Using agent-based modelling for investigating modal shift: The case of university travel”. Computers and Industrial Engineering 139:106077 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106077.
  16. “Exploring the relationship between transport interventions, mode choice, and travel perception: an empirical study in Beijing, China”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(12):4258.
  17. Fu, X. 2021. “How habit moderates the commute mode decision process: integration of the theory of planned behavior and latent class choice model”. Transportation 48:2681–2707 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10144-6.
  18. “Role of user’s socio-economic and travel characteristics in mode choice between city bus and informal transit services: Lessons from household surveys in Visakhapatnam, India”. Journal of Transport Geography 88:102307.
  19. “Motivations for motorcycle use for Urban travel in Latin America: A qualitative study”. Transport Policy 49:93–104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.010.
  20. “Why do Gender Differences in Daily Mobility Behaviours persist among workers?”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 145:34–48 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.016.
  21. “An updated conceptual framework for integrated modeling of human decision making: The Consumat II”. In paper for workshop complexity in the Real World@ ECCS, 1–18.
  22. “Agent-based models in transport planning: Current state, issues, and expectations”. Procedia Computer Science 170:726–732.
  23. “An agent-based model for diffusion of electric vehicles”. Journal of Environmental Psychology 52:166–182.
  24. “Factors influencing to travel behavior on transport mode choice-A case of Colombo metropolitan area in Sri Lanka”. International Journal of Affective Engineering 15(2):63–72.
  25. Metrocali 2015. “Encuesta de movilidad hogares Cali 2015”. https://www.metrocali.gov.co/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Encuesta-de-movilidad-2015.pdf.
  26. Olson, J. S. and G. M. Olson. 2003. “Culture Surprises in Remote Software Development Teams: When in Rome doesn’t help when your team crosses time zones, and your deadline doesn’t.”. Queue 1(9):52–59.
  27. PAHO 2017. “The Pan American Health Organization. La motocicleta en el tránsito en las Américas”. https://www.paho.org/es/documentos/hoja-informativa-motocicleta-transito-americas.
  28. La motocicleta en América Latina: caracterización de su uso e impactos en la movilidad en cinco ciudades de la region. América Latina y el Caribe: Corporación Andina de Fomento CAF.
  29. Rosenbloom, S. 2006. “Understanding Women’s and Men’s Travel Patterns: The Research Challenge.”. In Research on Women’s Issues in Transportation: Volume 1 Conference Overview and Plenary Papers, 7–28. Chicago, Illinois: Transportation Research Board.
  30. “Simulating Transport Mode Choices in Developing Countries”. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, 209–218. Springer.
  31. “Survey Summary: Mobility in Cali 2023”. https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/jes.s.d.az.blanco/viz/Encuestas_16844425109290/Surveysummary.
  32. “Simulating the social influence in transport mode choices”. In 2023 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 3154–3165. IEEE.
  33. “On-demand motorcycle taxis improve mobility, not sustainability”. Case Studies on Transport Policy 7(2):218–229.
  34. “Analysis of trends of purchasers of motorcycles in Latin America”. In Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interaction, Visualization, and Analytics: 20th International Conference, HIMI 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part I 20, 136–144. Springer.
  35. “Transportation in agent-based urban modelling”. In Agent Based Modelling of Urban Systems: First International Workshop, ABMUS 2016, Held in Conjunction with AAMAS, Singapore, Singapore, May 10, 2016, Revised, Selected, and Invited Papers 1, 129–148. Springer.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com