Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Application of the Digital Annealer Unit in Optimizing Chemical Reaction Conditions for Enhanced Production Yields (2407.17485v1)

Published 3 Jul 2024 in physics.chem-ph, cs.ET, and physics.data-an

Abstract: Finding appropriate reaction conditions that yield high product rates in chemical synthesis is crucial for the chemical and pharmaceutical industries. However, due to the vast chemical space, conducting experiments for each possible reaction condition is impractical. Consequently, models such as QSAR (Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship) or ML (Machine Learning) have been developed to predict the outcomes of reactions and illustrate how reaction conditions affect product yield. Despite these advancements, inferring all possible combinations remains computationally prohibitive when using a conventional CPU. In this work, we explore using a Digital Annealing Unit (DAU) to tackle these large-scale optimization problems more efficiently by solving Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Two types of QUBO models are constructed in this work: one using quantum annealing and the other using ML. Both models are built and tested on four high-throughput experimentation (HTE) datasets and selected Reaxys datasets. Our results suggest that the performance of models is comparable to classical ML methods (i.e., Random Forest and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP)), while the inference time of our models requires only seconds with a DAU. Additionally, in campaigns involving active learning and autonomous design of reaction conditions to achieve higher reaction yield, our model demonstrates significant improvements by adding new data, showing promise of adopting our method in the iterative nature of such problem settings. Our method can also accelerate the screening of billions of reaction conditions, achieving speeds millions of times faster than traditional computing units in identifying superior conditions. Therefore, leveraging the DAU with our developed QUBO models has the potential to be a valuable tool for innovative chemical synthesis.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Pgprules: a decision tree based prediction server for p-glycoprotein substrates and inhibitors. Bioinformatics, 35(20):4193–4195, 2019.
  2. Chemprop: A machine learning package for chemical property prediction. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 64(1):9–17, 2023.
  3. When do quantum mechanical descriptors help graph neural networks predict chemical properties? ChemRxiv, 2024. doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-7q438.
  4. Machine-learning methods for ligand–protein molecular docking. Drug discovery today, 27(1):151–164, 2022.
  5. Equibind: Geometric deep learning for drug binding structure prediction. In International conference on machine learning, pages 20503–20521. PMLR, 2022.
  6. Machine learning-enabled retrobiosynthesis of molecules. Nature Catalysis, 6(2):137–151, 2023.
  7. A robotic platform for flow synthesis of organic compounds informed by ai planning. Science, 365(6453):eaax1566, 2019.
  8. Autonomous, multiproperty-driven molecular discovery: From predictions to measurements and back. Science, 382(6677):eadi1407, 2023.
  9. Adaptive optimization of chemical reactions with minimal experimental information. Cell Reports Physical Science, 1(11):100247, 2020.
  10. Iterative experimental design based on active machine learning reduces the experimental burden associated with reaction screening. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, 5(10):1963–1972, 2020.
  11. Predicting reaction conditions from limited data through active transfer learning. Chemical science, 13(22):6655–6668, 2022.
  12. Identifying general reaction conditions by bandit optimization. Nature, 626(8001):1025–1033, 2024.
  13. Digital annealer for high-speed solving of combinatorial optimization problems and its applications. In 2020 25th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), pages 667–672. IEEE, 2020.
  14. A quantum-inspired approach to de-novo drug design. ChemRxiv, 2020. doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.12229232.v2.
  15. Predicting reaction performance in c–n cross-coupling using machine learning. Science, 360(6385):186–190, 2018.
  16. Deoxyfluorination with sulfonyl fluorides: navigating reaction space with machine learning. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 140(15):5004–5008, 2018.
  17. RDKit: Open-Source Cheminformatics. https://www.rdkit.org. (accessed 2024-6-24).
  18. Chemical name to structure: Opsin, an open source solution. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 51(3):739–753, 2011.
  19. Pubchem: a public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules. Nucleic acids research, 37(suppl_2):W623–W633, 2009.
  20. Chemspider: an online chemical information resource. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(11):1123–1124, 2010.
  21. Quantum bridge analytics i: a tutorial on formulating and using qubo models. Annals of Operations Research, 314(1):141–183, 2022.
  22. Kinetics of chemical reactions: decoding complexity. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
  23. Reoptimization of mdl keys for use in drug discovery. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences, 42(6):1273–1280, 2002.
  24. Qsar- how good is it in practice? comparison of descriptor sets on an unbiased cross section of corporate data sets. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 46(5):1924–1936, 2006.
  25. Extended-connectivity fingerprints. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 50(5):742–754, 2010.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com