Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

VisMin: Visual Minimal-Change Understanding (2407.16772v1)

Published 23 Jul 2024 in cs.CV, cs.CL, and cs.LG

Abstract: Fine-grained understanding of objects, attributes, and relationships between objects is crucial for visual-LLMs (VLMs). Existing benchmarks primarily focus on evaluating VLMs' capability to distinguish between two very similar \textit{captions} given an image. In this paper, we introduce a new, challenging benchmark termed \textbf{Vis}ual \textbf{Min}imal-Change Understanding (VisMin), which requires models to predict the correct image-caption match given two images and two captions. The image pair and caption pair contain minimal changes, i.e., only one aspect changes at a time from among the following: \textit{object}, \textit{attribute}, \textit{count}, and \textit{spatial relation}. These changes test the models' understanding of objects, attributes (such as color, material, shape), counts, and spatial relationships between objects. We built an automatic framework using LLMs and diffusion models, followed by a rigorous 4-step verification process by human annotators. Empirical experiments reveal that current VLMs exhibit notable deficiencies in understanding spatial relationships and counting abilities. We also generate a large-scale training dataset to finetune CLIP and Idefics2, showing significant improvements in fine-grained understanding across benchmarks and in CLIP's general image-text alignment. We release all resources, including the benchmark, training data, and finetuned model checkpoints, at \url{https://vismin.net/}.

PDF HTML Abstract

Overview of "VisMin: Visual Minimal-Change Understanding"

The paper "VisMin: Visual Minimal-Change Understanding" introduces a novel benchmark designed to probe the fine-grained understanding of Visual-LLMs (VLMs). Unlike conventional benchmarks that assess model performance by evaluating differences between similar captions given one image, VisMin evaluates the ability to discern minimal changes between two nearly identical images when provided with corresponding captions. This focus shifts to distinguishing between minor changes in object attributes, counts, and spatial relationships — essential skills for advanced VLMs.

Benchmark Construction and Methodology

The VisMin benchmark is curated through a sophisticated combination of automated tools and rigorous human verification steps:

  1. Minimal-Change Pairs Synthesis: Using LLMs and diffusion models, the authors generated minimal-change pairs for testing. This involved creating image-caption pairs that differ by a single aspect (object, attribute, count, spatial relation) without affecting other image components.
  2. Automated Filtering: This phase relied on a Visual Question Answering (VQA) system to ensure the generated images and captions were plausible and faithfully depicted the intended changes. The VQA system checked consistency by posing questions about the edited captions and verifying the coherence of responses based on the edited images.
  3. Human Verification: To further ensure data quality, human annotators conducted a four-step verification process involving checks for naturalness, the sensical nature of captions, and the faithful representation of minimal changes. This step was crucial in maintaining the robustness of the VisMin benchmark.

This meticulous approach allowed the authors to create a benchmark set composed of complex real-world images, mainly sourced from the COCO dataset, enriched by synthetically generated minimal-change pairs that pose significant challenges to current VLM capabilities.

Key Findings and Insights

Empirical evaluations on the VisMin benchmark exposed notable deficiencies in existing VLMs, particularly in understanding spatial relationships and counting capabilities. For instance, foundational VLMs like CLIP and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) such as Idefics2 showed robust performance in object and attribute understanding but struggled significantly with spatial relations, often performing below random chance.

Key findings include:

  • Current VLM Performance: Models like CLIP exhibited superior performance in object recognition tasks but lagged in more complex scenarios involving spatial relations and counting.
  • Relative Performance: Foundational models generally outperformed MLLMs, attributed to the latter's lack of training with multiple images and simple vertical concatenation methods that did not sufficiently parse visual signals for alignment.
  • Comparison Across Models: Within the studied models, GPT-4 and Gemini demonstrated strong capabilities, underlining the potential of closed-source models in these nuanced tasks.

Enhancing Fine-Grained Understanding Through Fine-Tuning

To address the identified gaps in VLM performance, the authors generated a large-scale minimal-change dataset for additional fine-tuning of VLMs. This dataset, consisting of over 64,000 examples, was leveraged to fine-tune CLIP and Idefics2:

  • Fine-Tuning CLIP: The fine-tuned CLIP (termed VisMin-CLIP) demonstrated marked improvements across most benchmark tasks, including substantial enhancements in multi-image understanding benchmarks such as Winoground and MMVP. This highlights the efficacy of minimal-change training data in bolstering fine-grained visual understanding.
  • Fine-Tuning Idefics2: Fine-tuning Idefics2 using the VisMin dataset also resulted in significant performance boosts, especially in spatial relations, showcasing the transformative potential of this fine-tuning method.

Implications and Future Directions

The introduction of VisMin and the accompanying datasets has several critical implications for the field of AI and VLM development:

  • Benchmarking and Evaluation: VisMin sets a new standard for evaluating the nuanced understanding capabilities of VLMs, ensuring that future models are rigorously tested for their ability to discern minimal changes in complex scenes.
  • Model Training and Fine-Tuning: The demonstrated improvements from fine-tuning with minimal-change data indicate that future VLMs can benefit significantly from incorporating such data into their training regimens.
  • Advancements in AI Research: Enhanced model capabilities in understanding fine-grained visual differences have far-reaching applications, from improving AI-driven content moderation to advancing autonomous systems that need to navigate dynamic environments.

In conclusion, the VisMin benchmark, with its emphasis on minimal visual changes, provides a crucial tool for advancing fine-grained visual understanding in VLMs. The benchmark, coupled with the substantial improvements seen in fine-tuning applications, sets the stage for future research aimed at overcoming current model limitations, particularly in spatial reasoning and counting, and fostering more capable AI systems.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.
  2. Internvl: Scaling up vision foundation models and aligning for generic visual-linguistic tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14238, 2023.
  3. Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2818–2829, 2023.
  4. Qlora: Efficient finetuning of quantized llms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  5. Teaching structured vision & language concepts to vision & language models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2657–2668, 2023.
  6. Dense and aligned captions (dac) promote compositional reasoning in vl models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  7. Incorporating structured representations into pretrained vision & language models using scene graphs, 2023.
  8. Sugarcrepe: Fixing hackable benchmarks for vision-language compositionality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14610, 2023.
  9. Tifa: Accurate and interpretable text-to-image faithfulness evaluation with question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11897, 2023.
  10. Learning to describe differences between pairs of similar images. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2018.
  11. Mixtral of experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04088, 2024.
  12. What’s “up” with vision-language models? investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning. In Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali, editors, Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 9161–9175, Singapore, December 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.568. URL https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.568.
  13. Image retrieval from contextual descriptions. In Smaranda Muresan, Preslav Nakov, and Aline Villavicencio, editors, Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 3426–3440, Dublin, Ireland, May 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.241. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.241.
  14. Obelics: An open web-scale filtered dataset of interleaved image-text documents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  15. Mimic-it: Multi-modal in-context instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05425, 2023a.
  16. Fine-tuning multimodal LLMs to follow zero-shot demonstrative instructions. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=BXY6fe7q31.
  17. Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. In International conference on machine learning, pages 12888–12900. PMLR, 2022.
  18. Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10355, 2023b.
  19. Gligen: Open-set grounded text-to-image generation. ArXiv, abs/2301.07093, 2023c. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:255942528.
  20. Llm-grounded diffusion: Enhancing prompt understanding of text-to-image diffusion models with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13655, 2023.
  21. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014.
  22. Visual spatial reasoning. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11:635–651, 2023a.
  23. Visual instruction tuning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36, 2024.
  24. Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05499, 2023b.
  25. Teaching clip to count to ten, 2023.
  26. VALSE: A task-independent benchmark for vision and language models centered on linguistic phenomena. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8253–8280, Dublin, Ireland, May 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.567. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.acl-long.567.
  27. Synthesize, diagnose, and optimize: Towards fine-grained vision-language understanding, 2023.
  28. Flickr30k entities: Collecting region-to-phrase correspondences for richer image-to-sentence models. IJCV, 123(1):74–93, 2017.
  29. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023.
  30. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  31. Coarse-to-fine contrastive learning in image-text-graph space for improved vision-language compositionality, 2023.
  32. Resolution-robust large mask inpainting with fourier convolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07161, 2021.
  33. Gemini Team. Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models, 2024.
  34. Winoground: Probing vision and language models for visio-linguistic compositionality. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5238–5248, June 2022.
  35. Eyes wide shut? exploring the visual shortcomings of multimodal llms, 2024.
  36. Equivariant similarity for vision-language foundation models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 11998–12008, October 2023.
  37. Coca: Contrastive captioners are image-text foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01917, 2022.
  38. Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16502, 2023.
  39. When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it? In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  40. When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it? In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=KRLUvxh8uaX.
  41. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 11975–11986, 2023.
  42. Countercurate: Enhancing physical and semantic visio-linguistic compositional reasoning via counterfactual examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13254, 2024.
  43. Contrasting intra-modal and ranking cross-modal hard negatives to enhance visio-linguistic fine-grained understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08832, 2023.
  44. An explainable toolbox for evaluating pre-trained vision-language models. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pages 30–37, Abu Dhabi, UAE, December 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-demos.4.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Rabiul Awal (9 papers)
  2. Saba Ahmadi (15 papers)
  3. Le Zhang (180 papers)
  4. Aishwarya Agrawal (28 papers)
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar