Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Preference-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Exploration (2407.06503v1)

Published 9 Jul 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) that allows reinforcement learning (RL) agents to learn from human feedback. This is particularly valuable when defining a fine-grain reward function is not feasible. However, this approach is inefficient and impractical for promoting deep exploration in hard-exploration tasks with long horizons and sparse rewards. To tackle this issue, we introduce LOPE: Learning Online with trajectory Preference guidancE, an end-to-end preference-guided RL framework that enhances exploration efficiency in hard-exploration tasks. Our intuition is that LOPE directly adjusts the focus of online exploration by considering human feedback as guidance, avoiding learning a separate reward model from preferences. Specifically, LOPE includes a two-step sequential policy optimization process consisting of trust-region-based policy improvement and preference guidance steps. We reformulate preference guidance as a novel trajectory-wise state marginal matching problem that minimizes the maximum mean discrepancy distance between the preferred trajectories and the learned policy. Furthermore, we provide a theoretical analysis to characterize the performance improvement bound and evaluate the LOPE's effectiveness. When assessed in various challenging hard-exploration environments, LOPE outperforms several state-of-the-art methods regarding convergence rate and overall performance. The code used in this study is available at \url{https://github.com/buaawgj/LOPE}.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Guojian Wang (10 papers)
  2. Faguo Wu (7 papers)
  3. Xiao Zhang (435 papers)
  4. Tianyuan Chen (4 papers)
  5. Xuyang Chen (19 papers)
  6. Lin Zhao (228 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.