Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PAS: Data-Efficient Plug-and-Play Prompt Augmentation System (2407.06027v5)

Published 8 Jul 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: In recent years, the rise of LLMs has spurred a growing demand for plug-and-play AI systems. Among the various AI techniques, prompt engineering stands out as particularly significant. However, users often face challenges in writing prompts due to the steep learning curve and significant time investment, and existing automatic prompt engineering (APE) models can be difficult to use. To address this issue, we propose PAS, an LLM-based plug-and-play APE system. PAS utilizes LLMs trained on high-quality, automatically generated prompt complementary datasets, resulting in exceptional performance. In comprehensive benchmarks, PAS achieves state-of-the-art (SoTA) results compared to previous APE models, with an average improvement of 6.09 points. Moreover, PAS is highly efficient, achieving SoTA performance with only 9000 data points. Additionally, PAS can autonomously generate prompt augmentation data without requiring additional human labor. Its flexibility also allows it to be compatible with all existing LLMs and applicable to a wide range of tasks. PAS excels in human evaluations, underscoring its suitability as a plug-in for users. This combination of high performance, efficiency, and flexibility makes PAS a valuable system for enhancing the usability and effectiveness of LLMs through improved prompt engineering.

Data-Efficient Plug-and-Play Prompt Augmentation System: An Overview

The paper "PAS: Data-Efficient Plug-and-Play Prompt Augmentation System" presents a robust approach to addressing challenges in prompt engineering for LLMs. The proposed system, PAS, aims to enhance the usability and effectiveness of LLMs by offering an automatic, flexible, and efficient method for prompt augmentation. This essay provides a detailed analysis of the methodologies, results, and implications of this work, along with potential future directions.

Methodology

The authors introduce PAS as a plug-and-play Automatic Prompt Engineering (APE) system designed to streamline the process of creating effective prompts for LLMs. Traditional methods of crafting prompts involve significant time investment and expertise, rendering them inaccessible to non-experts. Existing APE models, while automatic, often struggle with usability and efficiency.

PAS addresses these limitations through several innovative methodologies:

  1. High-Quality Prompt Dataset: The system leverages a curated dataset of high-quality prompts, automatically generated and selected using clustering algorithms and LLM-based evaluations. This set forms the foundation for creating complementary prompts.
  2. Automatic Complementary Prompt Generation: PAS uses few-shot learning techniques to autonomously produce complementary data. This process involves a rigorous selection and verification mechanism aimed at ensuring the quality of the generated data, which is then employed to fine-tune LLMs.
  3. Universal Compatibility: The system's design allows it to integrate seamlessly with various LLMs, maintaining flexibility across different tasks without requiring significant modifications.

Experimental Outcomes

The PAS system demonstrates state-of-the-art performance across several benchmarks, improving the efficacy of LLMs with an average enhancement of 6.09 points over previous state-of-the-art models. Additionally, the efficiency of PAS is highlighted by its ability to achieve these results using only 9000 data points, underscoring its data-efficient approach. Human evaluation further confirmed PAS's robustness and superiority, making it a user-friendly system applicable to a wide range of application scenarios.

Implications

The implications of this research are profound, both from theoretical and practical standpoints:

  • Enhanced Model Performance: By facilitating automatic and effective prompt generation, PAS could significantly improve the performance of LLMs across various domains, including specialized fields like medicine and law.
  • Increased Accessibility: The system lowers the barriers to utilizing LLMs effectively, making AI more accessible to users without deep technical expertise.
  • Efficient Resource Utilization: The focus on data efficiency allows for significant computational savings, potentially enabling faster development cycles and reducing the environmental footprint of AI model training.

Future Directions

There are several intriguing directions for future research and development based on the findings of this paper:

  • Expansion to Other Modalities: Exploring the application of PAS to other AI modalities beyond text, such as image or audio prompts, may extend its utility and impact.
  • Adaptive Learning: Incorporating mechanisms for adaptive learning could further improve PAS's ability to tailor prompts in dynamic environments or contexts where data evolves rapidly.
  • Integration with Upstream and Downstream Tasks: Investigating the integration of PAS with upstream data pre-processing tasks or downstream analytical processes could provide a more holistic improvement in AI system workflows.

In conclusion, PAS represents a significant advancement in the domain of prompt engineering for LLMs. By combining efficiency, flexibility, and automaticity, it not only addresses prevalent challenges but also sets the stage for future innovations in AI deployment and usability.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (19)
  1. Miao Zheng (7 papers)
  2. Hao Liang (137 papers)
  3. Fan Yang (878 papers)
  4. Haoze Sun (21 papers)
  5. Tianpeng Li (14 papers)
  6. Lingchu Xiong (1 paper)
  7. Yan Zhang (954 papers)
  8. Kun Li (193 papers)
  9. MingAn Lin (12 papers)
  10. Tao Zhang (481 papers)
  11. Guosheng Dong (13 papers)
  12. Yujing Qiao (5 papers)
  13. Kun Fang (93 papers)
  14. Weipeng Chen (56 papers)
  15. Bin Cui (165 papers)
  16. Wentao Zhang (261 papers)
  17. Zenan Zhou (24 papers)
  18. Youzhen Wu (1 paper)
  19. Yanjun Shen (9 papers)
Citations (3)