Beating the natural Grover bound for low-energy estimation and state preparation (2407.03073v2)
Abstract: Estimating ground state energies of many-body Hamiltonians is a central task in many areas of quantum physics. In this work, we give quantum algorithms which, given any $k$-body Hamiltonian $H$, compute an estimate for the ground state energy and prepare a quantum state achieving said energy, respectively. Specifically, for any $\varepsilon>0$, our algorithms return, with high probability, an estimate of the ground state energy of $H$ within additive error $\varepsilon M$, or a quantum state with the corresponding energy. Here, $M$ is the total strength of all interaction terms, which in general is extensive in the system size. Our approach makes no assumptions about the geometry or spatial locality of interaction terms of the input Hamiltonian and thus handles even long-range or all-to-all interactions, such as in quantum chemistry, where lattice-based techniques break down. In this fully general setting, the runtime of our algorithms scales as $2{cn/2}$ for $c<1$, yielding the first quantum algorithms for low-energy estimation breaking a standard square root Grover speedup for unstructured search. The core of our approach is remarkably simple, and relies on showing that an extensive fraction of the interactions can be neglected with a controlled error. What this ultimately implies is that even arbitrary $k$-local Hamiltonians have structure in their low energy space, in the form of an exponential-dimensional low energy subspace.
- A. Szabo and N. Ostlund, Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory, Dover Books on Chemistry (Dover Publications, 1996).
- T. Helgaker, P. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen, Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory (Wiley, 2014).
- M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect exchange coupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons, Physical Review 96, 99 (1954).
- M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Reviews of modern physics 82, 2313 (2010).
- R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Quantum simulations with trapped ions, Nature Physics 8, 277 (2012).
- S. Gopalakrishnan, B. L. Lev, and P. M. Goldbart, Frustration and glassiness in spin models with cavity-mediated interactions, Physical Review Letters 107, 277201 (2011).
- J. Kempe, A. Y. Kitaev, and O. Regev, The complexity of the local Hamiltonian problem, SIAM Journal on Computing 35, 1070 (2006a).
- N. Bansal, S. Bravyi, and B. M. Terhal, Classical approximation schemes for the ground-state energy of quantum and classical Ising spin Hamiltonians on planar graphs, Quantum Information & Computation 9, 701 (2009).
- D. Aharonov, I. Arad, and T. Vidick, Guest Column: The Quantum PCP Conjecture, SIGACT News 44, 47 (2013).
- J. Kempe, A. Kitaev, and O. Regev, The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem, SIAM Journal on Computing 35, 1070 (2006b).
- T. Cubitt and A. Montanaro, Complexity classification of local Hamiltonian problems, SIAM Journal on Computing 45, 268 (2016).
- S. Piddock and A. Montanaro, The complexity of antiferromagnetic interactions and 2D lattices, Quantum Information & Computation 17, 636 (2017).
- S. Arora and S. Safra, Probabilistic checking of proofs: A new characterization of NP, Journal of the ACM 45, 70 (1998).
- C. Lanczos, An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 45, 255 (1950).
- J. Kuczyński and H. Woźniakowski, Estimating the largest eigenvalue by the power and Lanczos algorithms with a random start, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 13, 1094 (1992).
- R. Impagliazzo and R. Paturi, On the complexity of k𝑘kitalic_k-SAT, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 62, 367 (2001).
- L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, in Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (1996) pp. 212–219.
- D. Poulin and P. Wocjan, Preparing ground states of quantum many-body systems on a quantum computer, Physical Review Letters 102, 130503 (2009).
- Y. Ge, J. Tura, and J. I. Cirac, Faster ground state preparation and high-precision ground energy estimation with fewer qubits, Journal of Mathematical Physics 60, 022202 (2019).
- L. Lin and Y. Tong, Near-optimal ground state preparation, Quantum 4, 372 (2020).
- Interactions acting on less qubits can be “padded” by adding further qubits on which they act trivially.
- R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1985).
- C. E. González-Guillén and T. S. Cubitt, History-state Hamiltonians are critical (2018), arXiv:1810.06528.