Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
175 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On polynomial kernelization for Stable Cutset (2407.02086v1)

Published 2 Jul 2024 in cs.DS

Abstract: A stable cutset in a graph $G$ is a set $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that vertices of $S$ are pairwise non-adjacent and such that $G-S$ is disconnected, i.e., it is both stable (or independent) set and a cutset (or separator). Unlike general cutsets, it is $NP$-complete to determine whether a given graph $G$ has any stable cutset. Recently, Rauch et al.\ [FCT 2023] gave a number of fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms, time $f(k)\cdot |V(G)|c$, for Stable Cutset under a variety of parameters $k$ such as the size of a (given) dominating set, the size of an odd cycle transversal, or the deletion distance to $P_5$-free graphs. Earlier works imply FPT algorithms relative to clique-width and relative to solution size. We complement these findings by giving the first results on the existence of polynomial kernelizations for \stablecutset, i.e., efficient preprocessing algorithms that return an equivalent instance of size polynomial in the parameter value. Under the standard assumption that $NP\nsubseteq coNP/poly$, we show that no polynomial kernelization is possible relative to the deletion distance to a single path, generalizing deletion distance to various graph classes, nor by the size of a (given) dominating set. We also show that under the same assumption no polynomial kernelization is possible relative to solution size, i.e., given $(G,k)$ answering whether there is a stable cutset of size at most $k$. On the positive side, we show polynomial kernelizations for parameterization by modulators to a single clique, to a cluster or a co-cluster graph, and by twin cover.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. Kernelization lower bounds by cross-composition. SIAM J. Discret. Math., 28(1):277–305, 2014.
  2. Kernel bounds for disjoint cycles and disjoint paths. Theor. Comput. Sci., 412(35):4570–4578, 2011.
  3. On stable cutsets in graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 105(1-3):39–50, 2000.
  4. Matching Cut in Graphs with Large Minimum Degree. Algorithmica, 83(5):1238–1255, 2021.
  5. Fragile graphs with small independent cuts. Journal of Graph Theory, 41(4):327–341, 2002.
  6. G. Chen and X. Yu. A note on fragile graphs. Discrete Mathematics, 249(1-3):41–43, 2002.
  7. V. Chvátal. Recognizing decomposable graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 8(1):51–53, 1984.
  8. D. G. Corneil and J. Fonlupt. Stable Set Bonding in Perfect Graphs and Parity Graphs. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B, 59(1):1–14, 1993.
  9. On problems as hard as CNF-SAT. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 12(3):41:1–41:24, 2016.
  10. Matching Cuts in Graphs of High Girth and H𝐻{H}italic_H-Free Graphs. In S. Iwata and N. Kakimura, editors, 34th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation, ISAAC 2023, Kyoto, Japan, volume 283 of LIPIcs, pages 31:1–31:16. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023.
  11. Refined notions of parameterized enumeration kernels with applications to matching cut enumeration. STACS 2021, LIPIcs 187:37:1–37:18, 2021, also in: J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 123:76–102, 2022.
  12. R. L. Graham. On primitive graphs and optimal vertex assignments. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 175(1):170–186, 1970.
  13. A completeness theory for polynomial (turing) kernelization. Algorithmica, 71(3):702–730, 2015.
  14. B. M. P. Jansen and S. Kratsch. Data reduction for graph coloring problems. Inf. Comput., 231:70–88, 2013.
  15. S. Klein and C. M. de Figueiredo. The NP-completeness of multi-partite cutset testing. Congressus Numeranium, 119:217–222, 1996.
  16. Matching cut: Kernelization, single-exponential time FPT, and exact exponential algorithms. IPEC 2018: 19:1-19:13, also in: Discret. Appl. Math., 283:44–58, 2020.
  17. On stable cutsets in claw-free graphs and planar graphs. J. Discrete Algorithms, 6(2):256–276, 2008.
  18. V. B. Le and F. Pfender. Extremal Graphs Having No Stable Cutset. Electr. J. Comb., 20(1):P35, 2013.
  19. V. B. Le and B. Randerath. On stable cutsets in line graphs. Theor. Comput. Sci., 1-3(301):463–475, 2003.
  20. Dichotomies for Maximum Matching Cut: H𝐻{H}italic_H-Freeness, Bounded Diameter, bounded radius. In 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, MFCS 2023, volume 272 of LIPIcs, pages 64:1–64:15. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023.
  21. Finding small separators in linear time via treewidth reduction. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 9(4):30:1–30:35, 2013.
  22. A. M. Moshi. Matching cutsets in graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, 13(5):527–536, 1989.
  23. Exact and Parameterized Algorithms for the Independent Cutset Problem. In H. Fernau and K. Jansen, editors, Fundamentals of Computation Theory - 24th International Symposium, FCT 2023, Trier, Germany, Proceedings, volume 14292 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 378–391. Springer, 2023.
  24. A. Tucker. Coloring graphs with stable cutsets. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B, 34(3):258–267, 1983.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.