Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Spatio-Temporal Graphical Counterfactuals: An Overview (2407.01875v1)

Published 2 Jul 2024 in cs.AI

Abstract: Counterfactual thinking is a critical yet challenging topic for artificial intelligence to learn knowledge from data and ultimately improve their performances for new scenarios. Many research works, including Potential Outcome Model and Structural Causal Model, have been proposed to realize it. However, their modelings, theoretical foundations and application approaches are usually different. Moreover, there is a lack of graphical approach to infer spatio-temporal counterfactuals, that considers spatial and temporal interactions between multiple units. Thus, in this work, our aim is to investigate a survey to compare and discuss different counterfactual models, theories and approaches, and further build a unified graphical causal frameworks to infer the spatio-temporal counterfactuals.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (122)
  1. S. L. Brunton, J. L. Proctor, and J. N. Kutz, “Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 15, pp. 3932–3937, 2016.
  2. W. Zhao, E. Weyer, and G. Yin, “A general framework for nonparametric identification of nonlinear stochastic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2449–2464, 2021.
  3. K. Zisis, C. P. Bechlioulis, and G. A. Rovithakis, “Control-enabling adaptive nonlinear system identification,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 3715–3721, 2022.
  4. X. Liu, D. Chen, W. Wei, X. Zhu, and W. Yu, “Interpretable sparse system identification: Beyond recent deep learning techniques on time-series prediction,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=aFWUY3E7ws
  5. T.-T. Gao and G. Yan, “Autonomous inference of complex network dynamics from incomplete and noisy data,” Nature Computational Science, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 160–168, 2022.
  6. B. Prasse and P. V. Mieghem, “Predicting network dynamics without requiring the knowledge of the interaction graph,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 44, p. e2205517119, 2022.
  7. M. Kang, R. Zhu, D. Chen, C. Li, W. Gu, X. Qian, and W. Yu, “A cross-modal generative adversarial network for scenarios generation of renewable energy,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2630–2640, 2024.
  8. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational bayes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114
  9. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Generative adversarial nets,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 27, 2014.
  10. D. Rezende and S. Mohamed, “Variational inference with normalizing flows,” in International Conference on Machine Learning.   PMLR, 2015, pp. 1530–1538.
  11. J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33.   Curran Associates, Inc., 2020, pp. 6840–6851.
  12. J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=St1giarCHLP
  13. Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=PxTIG12RRHS
  14. R. Ness, K. Paneri, and O. Vitek, “Integrating markov processes with structural causal modeling enables counterfactual inference in complex systems,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
  15. X. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Xu, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, W. X. Zhao, and J.-R. Wen, “Data augmented sequential recommendation based on counterfactual thinking,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 9181–9194, 2023.
  16. N. Seedat, F. Imrie, A. Bellot, Z. Qian, and M. van der Schaar, “Continuous-time modeling of counterfactual outcomes using neural controlled differential equations,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 162, 2022, pp. 19 497–19 521.
  17. B. Bevilacqua, K. Nikiforou, B. Ibarz, I. Bica, M. Paganini, C. Blundell, J. Mitrovic, and P. Veličković, “Neural algorithmic reasoning with causal regularisation,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 202.   PMLR, 2023, pp. 2272–2288.
  18. K. He, L. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Q. Liu, and G. Wang, “Learning counterfactual explanation of graph neural networks via generative flow network,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10496445
  19. K. Fujii, K. Takeuchi, A. Kuribayashi, N. Takeishi, Y. Kawahara, and K. Takeda, “Estimating counterfactual treatment outcomes over time in complex multiagent scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10445111
  20. D. B. Rubin, “Causal inference using potential outcomes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 100, no. 469, pp. 322–331, 2005.
  21. R. P. Althauser and D. B. Rubin, “The computerized construction of a matched sample,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 325–346, 1970.
  22. W. G. Cochran and D. B. Rubin, “Controlling bias in observational studies: A review,” Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002), vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 417–446, 1973.
  23. D. B. Rubin, “Multivariate matching methods that are equal percent bias reducing, i: Some examples,” Biometrics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 109–120, 1976.
  24. E. A. Stuart and D. B. Rubin, “Matching with multiple control groups with adjustment for group differences,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 279–306, 2008.
  25. P. R. Rosenbaum and D. B. Rubin, “The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects,” Biometrika, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 1983.
  26. D. B. Rubin and N. Thomas, “Matching using estimated propensity scores: Relating theory to practice,” Biometrics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 249–264, 1996.
  27. D. B. Rubin, “Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 757–763, 1997.
  28. M. Caliendo and S. Kopeinig, “Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching,” Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 31–72, 2008.
  29. K. Pearson, “Liii. on lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space,” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 559–572, 1901.
  30. D. R. Cox, “The regression analysis of binary sequences,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 215–232, 1958.
  31. C. A. Sims, “Macroeconomics and reality,” Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–48, 1980.
  32. O. J. Blanchard and D. Quah, “The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances,” pp. 655–673, 1988.
  33. T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader, “Tensor decompositions and applications,” SIAM Review, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 455–500, 2009.
  34. E. Acar, D. M. Dunlavy, T. G. Kolda, and M. Mørup, “Scalable tensor factorizations for incomplete data,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2011.
  35. D. B. Rubin, “Randomization analysis of experimental data: The fisher randomization test comment,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 75, no. 371, pp. 591–593, 1980.
  36. D. B. Rubin, “Inference and missing data,” Biometrika, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 581–592, 1976.
  37. D. B. Rubin, “Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 34–58, 1978.
  38. D. B. Rubin, “Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 688–701, 1974.
  39. J. Pearl, “Bayesian netwcrks: A model cf self-activated memory for evidential reasoning,” in Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA., 1985. [Online]. Available: https://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/r43-1985.pdf
  40. J. Pearl, “Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 241–288, 1986.
  41. J. Pearl, “Evidential reasoning using stochastic simulation of causal models,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 245–257, 1987.
  42. D. Geiger, T. Verma, and J. Pearl, “Identifying independence in bayesian networks,” Networks, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 507–534, 1990.
  43. J. Pearl, “[bayesian analysis in expert systems]: Comment: Graphical models, causality and intervention,” Statistical Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 266–269, 1993.
  44. J. Pearl, “Causal diagrams for empirical research,” Biometrika, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 669–688, 1995.
  45. J. Pearl, “Causal inference in statistics: An overview,” Statistics Surveys, vol. 3, pp. 96–146, 2009.
  46. C. Glymour, K. Zhang, and P. Spirtes, “Review of causal discovery methods based on graphical models,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 10, p. 524, 2019.
  47. B. Schölkopf, F. Locatello, S. Bauer, N. R. Ke, N. Kalchbrenner, A. Goyal, and Y. Bengio, “Toward causal representation learning,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 612–634, 2021.
  48. M. J. Vowels, N. C. Camgoz, and R. Bowden, “D’ya like dags? a survey on structure learning and causal discovery,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1–36, 2022.
  49. C. K. Assaad, E. Devijver, and E. Gaussier, “Survey and evaluation of causal discovery methods for time series,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 73, pp. 767–819, 2022.
  50. U. Hasan, E. Hossain, and M. O. Gani, “A survey on causal discovery methods for i.i.d. and time series data,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=YdMrdhGx9y
  51. G. Lacerda, P. Spirtes, J. Ramsey, and P. O. Hoyer, “Discovering cyclic causal models by independent components analysis,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), ser. UAI’08.   AUAI Press, 2008, pp. 366–374.
  52. P. Spirtes, “Directed cyclic graphical representations of feedback models,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), 1995, p. 491–498.
  53. P. Forré and J. M. Mooij, “Markov properties for graphical models with cycles and latent variables,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.08775, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.08775
  54. S. Bongers, P. Forré, J. Peters, and J. M. Mooij, “Foundations of structural causal models with cycles and latent variables,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 2885 – 2915, 2021.
  55. A. Barnard and D. Page, “Causal structure learning via temporal markov networks,” in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models, vol. 72.   PMLR, 2018, pp. 13–24.
  56. P. Spirtes, C. Meek, and T. Richardson, “Causal inference in the presence of latent variables and selection bias,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI).   Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1995, pp. 499–506.
  57. P. Spirtes, “An anytime algorithm for causal inference,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. R3.   PMLR, 2001, pp. 278–285.
  58. D. Colombo, M. H. Maathuis, M. Kalisch, and T. S. Richardson, “Learning high-dimensional directed acyclic graphs with latent and selection variables,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 294–321, 2012.
  59. D. Colombo and M. H. Maathuis, “Order-independent constraint-based causal structure learning,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 15, no. 116, pp. 3921–3962, 2014.
  60. J. M. Ogarrio, P. Spirtes, and J. Ramsey, “A hybrid causal search algorithm for latent variable models,” in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models, vol. 52.   PMLR, 2016, pp. 368–379.
  61. V. K. Raghu, J. D. Ramsey, A. Morris, D. V. Manatakis, P. Sprites, P. K. Chrysanthis, C. Glymour, and P. V. Benos, “Comparison of strategies for scalable causal discovery of latent variable models from mixed data,” International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, vol. 6, pp. 33–45, 2018.
  62. M. Kocaoglu, A. Jaber, K. Shanmugam, and E. Bareinboim, “Characterization and learning of causal graphs with latent variables from soft interventions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
  63. A. Jaber, M. Kocaoglu, K. Shanmugam, and E. Bareinboim, “Causal discovery from soft interventions with unknown targets: Characterization and learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 9551–9561.
  64. A. Li, A. Jaber, and E. Bareinboim, “Causal discovery from observational and interventional data across multiple environments,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, 2023, pp. 16 942–16 956.
  65. A. Rotnitzky and E. Smucler, “Efficient adjustment sets for population average causal treatment effect estimation in graphical models,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 21, no. 188, pp. 1–86, 2020.
  66. J. Runge, “Necessary and sufficient graphical conditions for optimal adjustment sets in causal graphical models with hidden variables,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, 2021, pp. 15 762–15 773.
  67. S. Triantafillou and G. Cooper, “Learning adjustment sets from observational and limited experimental data,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 9940–9948, 2021.
  68. E. Smucler, F. Sapienza, and A. Rotnitzky, “Efficient adjustment sets in causal graphical models with hidden variables,” Biometrika, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 49–65, 2022.
  69. G. W. Imbens and D. B. Rubin, “Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with noncompliance,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 305–327, 1997.
  70. F. Mealli and D. B. Rubin, “Assumptions allowing the estimation of direct causal effects,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2003.
  71. D. B. Rubin, “Direct and indirect causal effects via potential outcomes,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2004.
  72. R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1173–1182, 1986.
  73. D. P. Mackinnon and J. H. Dwyer, “Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies,” Evaluation Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 144–158, 1993.
  74. D. P. MacKinnon, C. M. Lockwood, and J. Williams, “Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 99–128, 2004.
  75. D. P. MacKinnon, A. J. Fairchild, and M. S. Fritz, “Mediation analysis,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 58, pp. 593–614, 2007.
  76. M. E. Sobel, “Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models,” Sociological Methodology, vol. 13, pp. 290–312, 1982.
  77. M. E. Sobel, “Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models,” Sociological Methodology, vol. 16, pp. 159–186, 1986.
  78. J. Hahn, P. Todd, and W. V. der Klaauw, “Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design,” Econometrica, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 201–209, 2001.
  79. J. McCrary, “Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 698–714, 2008.
  80. M. Bertrand, E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan, “How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 249–275, 2004.
  81. M. Lechner, “The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods,” Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 165–224, 2011.
  82. J. Sun, D. Taylor, and E. M. Bollt, “Causal network inference by optimal causation entropy,” SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 73–106, 2015.
  83. M. Kang, D. Chen, N. Meng, G. Yan, and W. Yu, “Identifying unique causal network from nonstationary time series,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10085, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10085
  84. P. Hoyer, D. Janzing, J. M. Mooij, J. Peters, and B. Schölkopf, “Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 21, 2008.
  85. K. Zhang, B. Huang, J. Zhang, C. Glymour, and B. Schölkopf, “Causal discovery from nonstationary/heterogeneous data: Skeleton estimation and orientation determination,” in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2017.   NIH Public Access, 2017, pp. 1347–1353.
  86. B. Huang, K. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Ramsey, R. Sanchez-Romero, C. Glymour, and B. Schölkopf, “Causal discovery from heterogeneous/nonstationary data,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 21, no. 89, pp. 1–53, 2020.
  87. B. Barzel and A.-L. Barabási, “Universality in network dynamics,” Nature Physics, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 673–681, 2013.
  88. P. Brouillard, S. Lachapelle, A. Lacoste, S. Lacoste-Julien, and A. Drouin, “Differentiable causal discovery from interventional data,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 21 865–21 877.
  89. Y. He, P. Cui, Z. Shen, R. Xu, F. Liu, and Y. Jiang, “Daring: Differentiable causal discovery with residual independence,” in Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining.   Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 596–605.
  90. A. Zhang, F. Liu, W. Ma, Z. Cai, X. Wang, and T.-S. Chua, “Boosting causal discovery via adaptive sample reweighting,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=LNpMtk15AS4
  91. B. Huang, K. Zhang, and B. Schölkopf, “Identification of time-dependent causal model: a gaussian process treatment,” in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2015, pp. 3561–3568.
  92. B. Huang, K. Zhang, M. Gong, and C. Glymour, “Causal discovery and forecasting in nonstationary environments with state-space models,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 97.   PMLR, 2019, pp. 2901–2910.
  93. Y. He and Z. Geng, “Causal network learning from multiple interventions of unknown manipulated targets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.08611, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08611
  94. J. Peters, P. Bühlmann, and N. Meinshausen, “Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 947–1012, 2016.
  95. N. Pfister, P. Bühlmann, and J. Peters, “Invariant causal prediction for sequential data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 114, no. 527, pp. 1264–1276, 2018.
  96. R. Pamfil, N. Sriwattanaworachai, S. Desai, P. Pilgerstorfer, K. Georgatzis, P. Beaumont, and B. Aragam, “Dynotears: Structure learning from time-series data,” in Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 108.   PMLR, 2020, pp. 1595–1605.
  97. R. P. Adams and D. J. MacKay, “Bayesian online changepoint detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:0710.3742, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3742
  98. S. Aminikhanghahi and D. J. Cook, “A survey of methods for time series change point detection,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 339–367, 2017.
  99. D. Rezende and S. Mohamed, “Variational inference with normalizing flows,” in International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 37.   PMLR, 2015, pp. 1530–1538.
  100. G. Papamakarios, E. Nalisnick, D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, and B. Lakshminarayanan, “Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 22, no. 57, pp. 1–64, 2021.
  101. A. Javaloy, P. Sanchez-Martin, and I. Valera, “Causal normalizing flows: from theory to practice,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, 2023, pp. 58 833–58 864.
  102. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, “Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks,” Nature, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440–442, 1998.
  103. M. Newman and D. Watts, “Renormalization group analysis of the small-world network model,” Physics Letters A, vol. 263, no. 4, pp. 341–346, 1999.
  104. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, “Emergence of scaling in random networks,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 509–512, 1999.
  105. R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabási, “Error and attack tolerance of complex networks,” Nature, vol. 406, no. 6794, pp. 378–382, 2000.
  106. J. Gao, S. V. Buldyrev, S. Havlin, and H. E. Stanley, “Robustness of a network of networks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, p. 195701, 2011.
  107. S. Boccaletti, J. Kurths, G. Osipov, D. Valladares, and C. Zhou, “The synchronization of chaotic systems,” Physics Reports, vol. 366, no. 1, pp. 1–101, 2002.
  108. A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, “Synchronization in complex networks,” Physics Reports, vol. 469, no. 3, pp. 93–153, 2008.
  109. S. Boccaletti, J. Almendral, S. Guan, I. Leyva, Z. Liu, I. Sendiña-Nadal, Z. Wang, and Y. Zou, “Explosive transitions in complex networks’ structure and dynamics: Percolation and synchronization,” Physics Reports, vol. 660, pp. 1–94, 2016.
  110. D. Ghosh, M. Frasca, A. Rizzo, S. Majhi, S. Rakshit, K. Alfaro-Bittner, and S. Boccaletti, “The synchronized dynamics of time-varying networks,” Physics Reports, vol. 949, pp. 1–63, 2022.
  111. X. F. Wang and G. Chen, “Pinning control of scale-free dynamical networks,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 310, no. 3, pp. 521–531, 2002.
  112. J. Lv and G. Chen, “A time-varying complex dynamical network model and its controlled synchronization criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 841–846, 2005.
  113. W. Yu, G. Chen, and J. Lv, “On pinning synchronization of complex dynamical networks,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 429–435, 2009.
  114. W. Yu, P. DeLellis, G. Chen, M. di Bernardo, and J. Kurths, “Distributed adaptive control of synchronization in complex networks,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2153–2158, 2012.
  115. W. Yu, G. Chen, J. Lv, and J. Kurths, “Synchronization via pinning control on general complex networks,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 1395–1416, 2013.
  116. W. Yu, W. Ren, W. X. Zheng, G. Chen, and J. Lv, “Distributed control gains design for consensus in multi-agent systems with second-order nonlinear dynamics,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 2107–2115, 2013.
  117. Y.-Y. Liu, J.-J. Slotine, and A.-L. Barabási, “Controllability of complex networks,” Nature, vol. 473, no. 7346, pp. 167–173, 2011.
  118. A. Li, S. P. Cornelius, Y.-Y. Liu, L. Wang, and A.-L. Barabási, “The fundamental advantages of temporal networks,” Science, vol. 358, no. 6366, pp. 1042–1046, 2017.
  119. J. Gao, B. Barzel, and A.-L. Barabási, “Universal resilience patterns in complex networks,” Nature, vol. 530, no. 7590, pp. 307–312, 2016.
  120. X. Liu, D. Li, M. Ma, B. K. Szymanski, H. E. Stanley, and J. Gao, “Network resilience,” Physics Reports, vol. 971, pp. 1–108, 2022.
  121. J. Gao, “Intrinsic simplicity of complex systems,” Nature Physics, vol. 20, pp. 184–185, 2024.
  122. V. Thibeault, A. Allard, and P. Desrosiers, “The low-rank hypothesis of complex systems,” Nature Physics, vol. 20, pp. 294–302, 2024.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Mingyu Kang (13 papers)
  2. Duxin Chen (5 papers)
  3. Ziyuan Pu (27 papers)
  4. Jianxi Gao (47 papers)
  5. Wenwu Yu (10 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now