Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Contextual Online Learning Theory of Brokerage (2407.01566v1)

Published 22 May 2024 in q-fin.CP, cs.GT, cs.LG, and stat.ML

Abstract: We study the role of contextual information in the online learning problem of brokerage between traders. At each round, two traders arrive with secret valuations about an asset they wish to trade. The broker suggests a trading price based on contextual data about the asset. Then, the traders decide to buy or sell depending on whether their valuations are higher or lower than the brokerage price. We assume the market value of traded assets is an unknown linear function of a $d$-dimensional vector representing the contextual information available to the broker. Additionally, we model traders' valuations as independent bounded zero-mean perturbations of the asset's market value, allowing for potentially different unknown distributions across traders and time steps. Consistently with the existing online learning literature, we evaluate the performance of a learning algorithm with the regret with respect to the gain from trade. If the noise distributions admit densities bounded by some constant $L$, then, for any time horizon $T$: - If the agents' valuations are revealed after each interaction, we provide an algorithm achieving $O ( L d \ln T )$ regret, and show a corresponding matching lower bound of $\Omega( Ld \ln T )$. - If only their willingness to sell or buy at the proposed price is revealed after each interaction, we provide an algorithm achieving $O(\sqrt{LdT \ln T })$ regret, and show that this rate is optimal (up to logarithmic factors), via a lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{LdT})$. To complete the picture, we show that if the bounded density assumption is lifted, then the problem becomes unlearnable, even with full feedback.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.