Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Semantic Membership Inference Attack against Large Language Models (2406.10218v1)

Published 14 Jun 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) determine whether a specific data point was included in the training set of a target model. In this paper, we introduce the Semantic Membership Inference Attack (SMIA), a novel approach that enhances MIA performance by leveraging the semantic content of inputs and their perturbations. SMIA trains a neural network to analyze the target model's behavior on perturbed inputs, effectively capturing variations in output probability distributions between members and non-members. We conduct comprehensive evaluations on the Pythia and GPT-Neo model families using the Wikipedia dataset. Our results show that SMIA significantly outperforms existing MIAs; for instance, SMIA achieves an AUC-ROC of 67.39% on Pythia-12B, compared to 58.90% by the second-best attack.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Hamid Mozaffari (6 papers)
  2. Virendra J. Marathe (10 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

Overview of Semantic Membership Inference Attack Against LLMs

The paper introduces a novel approach called Semantic Membership Inference Attack (SMIA) for assessing Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) on LLMs. MIAs are critical in determining if a specific data point was used in training a model, being a key metric for measuring potential privacy risks. SMIA enhances traditional MIAs by incorporating semantic understanding of inputs and their perturbations, thereby improving the accuracy of detecting training data membership.

Methodology

SMIA innovatively leverages a neural network model to capture the semantic and probabilistic behavior differences observed in the outputs of a target model when provided with perturbed inputs. This contrasts with previous MIAs that primarily focused on overfitting models to identify verbatim memorization. By focusing on semantic similarities rather than exact matches, SMIA attempts to uncover less direct forms of memorization where the model retains the gist or meaning of training data.

The four-step process for SMIA involves generating perturbed versions of the input texts (neighbors), calculating their semantic embeddings, measuring the target model's loss on these inputs, and finally, classifying membership status using a trained neural network. The semantic embeddings are derived using advanced pre-trained models, like the Cohere Embedding model, ensuring that even subtle semantic nuances are preserved.

Results

Evaluating SMIA on the Pythia and GPT-Neo model families using the Wikipedia dataset revealed substantial improvements over existing MIAs. Notably, SMIA achieved an AUC-ROC of 67.39% on the Pythia-12B model, surpassing the second-best attack, which scored 58.90%. These results were consistent across various settings, including where non-member datasets were closely related to or distinct from the training data distribution, indicating SMIA's robustness and generalizability. SMIA maintained effectiveness even under minor data alterations (e.g., word duplications, additions, or deletions), further confirming its utility for real-world applications where exact replicas of training data may not be feasible.

Implications and Future Work

SMIA's ability to detect memberships based on semantic content opens new avenues for addressing privacy concerns in LLMs. This approach highlights potential memorization beyond exact match, which could lead to privacy implications in applications like personalized content recommendations, medical data utilizations, and legal settings involving intellectual property.

In future research, the application of SMIA could be pivotal in understanding unintended memorization phenomena such as multi-hop reasoning or hallucinations in LLMs. It could also aid in evaluating methods for differential privacy, model interpretability, and robustness against adversarial attacks. The exploration of SMIA against paraphrased or conceptually transformed data might offer insights into semantic vulnerabilities and guide the development of safeguards against privacy breaches. Additionally, its adaptability to different training regimes and datasets mapping diverse real-world scenarios will further enhance its applicability and pertinence in safeguarding model integrity and user privacy.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com