Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Compute Better Spent: Replacing Dense Layers with Structured Matrices (2406.06248v1)

Published 10 Jun 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: Dense linear layers are the dominant computational bottleneck in foundation models. Identifying more efficient alternatives to dense matrices has enormous potential for building more compute-efficient models, as exemplified by the success of convolutional networks in the image domain. In this work, we systematically explore structured matrices as replacements for dense matrices. We show that different structures often require drastically different initialization scales and learning rates, which are crucial to performance, especially as models scale. Using insights from the Maximal Update Parameterization, we determine the optimal scaling for initialization and learning rates of these unconventional layers. Finally, we measure the scaling laws of different structures to compare how quickly their performance improves with compute. We propose a novel matrix family containing Monarch matrices, the Block Tensor-Train (BTT), which we show performs better than dense matrices for the same compute on multiple tasks. On CIFAR-10/100 with augmentation, BTT achieves exponentially lower training loss than dense when training MLPs and ViTs. BTT matches dense ViT-S/32 performance on ImageNet-1k with 3.8 times less compute and is more efficient than dense for training small GPT-2 LLMs.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Shikai Qiu (9 papers)
  2. Andres Potapczynski (11 papers)
  3. Marc Finzi (25 papers)
  4. Micah Goldblum (96 papers)
  5. Andrew Gordon Wilson (133 papers)
Citations (7)

Summary

Compute Better Spent: Replacing Dense Layers with Structured Matrices

The paper "Compute Better Spent: Replacing Dense Layers with Structured Matrices" explores the optimization of computational efficiency in neural networks by replacing traditional dense layers with structured matrices. In line with previous successes demonstrated by convolutional networks, this paper systematically examines various structured matrices to identify the most effective alternatives for dense matrices, particularly in large foundation models where dense linear layers represent a significant computational bottleneck.

Key Contributions

  1. Sensitive Initialization and Learning Rates: The research highlights that different structures require different initialization scales and learning rates, which are critical to performance, especially as models scale. This is based on insights from the Maximal Update Parameterization (),whichhelpsdeterminetheoptimalscalingofinitializationandlearningratesforstructuredlayers.</li><li><strong>ScalingLawsandStructuredMatrices</strong>:Thecoreofthepaperaddressesthescalinglawsofdifferentstructuredmatrices.ItintroducestheBlockTensorTrain(BTT)family,whichincludesMonarchmatrices,demonstratingthatthesestructurescandeliverbetterperformancethandensematricesforthesamecomputeresourcesacrosstaskssuchasCIFAR10/100andImageNet1k.</li><li><strong>StrongNumericalResults</strong>:OnCIFAR10/100withaugmentation,BTTmatricesachieveexponentiallylowertraininglossthandensematriceswhenutilizedinMLPsandViTs.TheperformancegainsarefurthervalidatedonImageNet1k,whereBTTmatchesthedenseViTS/32performancewith3.8timeslesscompute.Additionally,forsmallGPT2LLMs,BTTisshowntobemoreefficientthandenselayers.</li><li><strong>StructureAwareLearningRateScaling</strong>:ThepaperextendstheMaximalUpdateParameterization(), which helps determine the optimal scaling of initialization and learning rates for structured layers.</li> <li><strong>Scaling Laws and Structured Matrices</strong>: The core of the paper addresses the scaling laws of different structured matrices. It introduces the Block Tensor-Train (BTT) family, which includes Monarch matrices, demonstrating that these structures can deliver better performance than dense matrices for the same compute resources across tasks such as CIFAR-10/100 and ImageNet-1k.</li> <li><strong>Strong Numerical Results</strong>: On CIFAR-10/100 with augmentation, BTT matrices achieve exponentially lower training loss than dense matrices when utilized in MLPs and ViTs. The performance gains are further validated on ImageNet-1k, where BTT matches the dense ViT-S/32 performance with 3.8 times less compute. Additionally, for small GPT-2 LLMs, BTT is shown to be more efficient than dense layers.</li> <li><strong>Structure-Aware Learning Rate Scaling</strong>: The paper extends the Maximal Update Parameterization () to structured matrices, allowing automatic determination of appropriate initialization and learning rate scales for various structured layers. This method proves crucial in realizing the performance advantages of structured matrices.
  2. Compute-Memory Trade-offs: The research elucidates that while structured matrices like BTT and Monarch can significantly reduce compute cost per dimension, they also introduce flexibility in balancing compute efficiency and memory efficiency. This balancing act is particularly important when considering training with large batch sizes, where the memory cost is dominated by storing activations.

Implications and Future Developments

The findings from this paper hold several practical and theoretical implications.

  • Practical Implications: The demonstrated compute efficiency of structured matrices like BTT and Monarch suggests that substituting dense layers with these alternatives could lead to substantial reductions in computational cost and energy consumption during neural network training. This is particularly relevant for large-scale models such as GPT-3, where the compute cost is a significant consideration.
  • Scaling Laws and Model Design: The research identifies that structures adhering to a principle where parameters equal FLOPs tend to scale better, providing a pathway for designing more computationally efficient models. This insight could guide future neural network architecture designs to optimize compute-resource allocation more effectively.
  • Future Research Directions: Extending the evaluation of these structured matrices to larger-scale models and datasets remains an exciting avenue for future work. Additionally, studying compute-optimal scaling laws, where training iterations and model size are optimized together, could provide further insights into the benefits of structured matrices. The theoretical exploration of structure-dependent scaling laws based on data manifold characteristics and model configurations also presents an important future direction.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the paper "Compute Better Spent: Replacing Dense Layers with Structured Matrices" offers a comprehensive and empirical exploration into the usage of structured matrices within neural networks. By systematically comparing different matrix structures and developing a methodology for optimizing their initialization and learning rates, the paper reveals significant potential for structured matrices to outperform traditional dense layers in both computational efficiency and scaling performance. The implications of this research extend to the theoretical understanding of scaling laws and the practical design of next-generation neural network architectures.