Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Survey of Transformer Enabled Time Series Synthesis (2406.02322v1)

Published 4 Jun 2024 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: Generative AI has received much attention in the image and language domains, with the transformer neural network continuing to dominate the state of the art. Application of these models to time series generation is less explored, however, and is of great utility to machine learning, privacy preservation, and explainability research. The present survey identifies this gap at the intersection of the transformer, generative AI, and time series data, and reviews works in this sparsely populated subdomain. The reviewed works show great variety in approach, and have not yet converged on a conclusive answer to the problems the domain poses. GANs, diffusion models, state space models, and autoencoders were all encountered alongside or surrounding the transformers which originally motivated the survey. While too open a domain to offer conclusive insights, the works surveyed are quite suggestive, and several recommendations for best practice, and suggestions of valuable future work, are provided.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Alexander Sommers (5 papers)
  2. Logan Cummins (6 papers)
  3. Sudip Mittal (66 papers)
  4. Shahram Rahimi (36 papers)
  5. Maria Seale (12 papers)
  6. Joseph Jaboure (5 papers)
  7. Thomas Arnold (13 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

A Survey of Transformer Enabled Time Series Synthesis

The paper A Survey of Transformer Enabled Time Series Synthesis by Alexander Sommers et al. provides an examination of the largely unexplored domain where time series data generation and transformer neural networks (TNNs) intersect. The importance of time series data in diverse applications such as medical diagnostics, weather prediction, financial analytics, and machinery maintenance underscores the need for advanced generative methods. However, compared to advancements in other data domains like images and text, the progress in applying state-of-the-art generative models to time series data has been relatively scarce.

Summary of Reviewed Works

The paper identifies twelve notable works that leverage transformers for time series generation and categorizes them into synthesis and forecasting tasks. Each work approaches the problem through various architectures, including purely transformer-based models, hybrids incorporating other neural network types, and those integrating state-space models (SSMs).

  1. Informer: Zhou et al. present a transformer encoder-decoder model employing probabilistic sparse attention (PSA) aimed at multi-horizon forecasting. The model's parallel training capability differentiates it in handling long-range dependencies more efficiently than traditional RNNs.
  2. AST: Wu et al.'s Adversarial Sparse Transformer (AST) combines sparse attention mechanisms with an adversarial discriminator. This hybrid approach offers robust multi-horizon forecasting by incorporating generative adversarial strategies to regularize predictions.
  3. GenF: Liu et al. develop a hybrid model blending autoregressive and direct prediction to mitigate error accumulation in long-term forecasting. The model combines a canonical TNN encoder with auxiliary forecasting methods.
  4. TTS-GAN: Li et al. adapt the GAN architecture using pure transformer networks for time series synthesis, targeting bio-signal data with a generative adversarial framework to enhance data generation quality.
  5. TsT-GAN: Srinivasan et al. refine TTS-GAN by incorporating BERT-style masked-position imputation to balance global sequence generation and local dependency modeling.
  6. TTS-CGAN: An extension of TTS-GAN by Li et al., introducing conditional generation using the Wasserstein GAN approach for bio-signal data.
  7. MTS-CGAN: Mandane et al. extend the TTS-CGAN model, allowing conditioning on both class labels and time series projections, adding a Fréchet inception distance metric for evaluation.
  8. Time-LLM: Jin et al.'s innovative application of a frozen pretrained LLM (Llama-7B) reprogrammed via cross-modal transduction modules for time series forecasting, demonstrating substantial promise for leveraging LLMs in non-language domains.
  9. DSAT-ECG: Zama et al. integrate diffusion models with state-space architectures to generate electrocardiogram (ECG) data, showing the utility of SPADE blocks with TNN and local-attention variants.
  10. Time-Transformer AAE: Liu et al.'s adversarial autoencoder for time series synthesis combines TCNs and transformer encoders via bidirectional cross-attention mechanisms for neurologically diverse applications.
  11. TimesFM: Das et al. introduce a decoder-only transformer model pretrained on vast datasets including Google search trends and Wikipedia page views, positioning it as a foundational model for general time series forecasting.
  12. Time Weaver: Narasimhan et al. propose a diffusion model incorporating CSDI and SSSD methodologies with heterogenous metadata conditioning, evaluated via Joint Frechet Time Series Distance (J-FTSD).

Implications and Future Directions

The surveyed works collectively highlight the versatility and potential of transformers in time series generation. However, the lack of a unified benchmark for rigorous comparison underscores the need for standardization. Adoption of benchmarks such as those proposed by Ang et al. could significantly enhance evaluative rigor, allowing consistent assessment across varied methods.

Recommendations

Future work should emphasize:

  1. Benchmark Development: Establishing and adopting shared benchmarks to facilitate rigorous comparison and consistent evaluation across different models.
  2. Hybrid Architectures: Investigation of hybrid models that combine TNNs with SSMs, TCNs, and other architectures to leverage inductive biases and improve performance on specific tasks.
  3. Transfer Learning: Exploring pretraining on large datasets and fine-tuning on smaller, specific datasets to maximize the utility of generative models in diverse applications.
  4. Functional Representation: Standardizing methods for patching and embedding time series data to optimize its semantic density for modeling temporal dependencies.
  5. Time Series Style Transfer: Developing methods for counterfactual generation and style transfer in time series data for enhanced explainability and test scenarios.

In conclusion, while transformer-enabled time series synthesis is at an early stage, it holds significant promise. Addressing the challenges of evaluation, hybrid methodologies, and standardized data representation will likely lead to substantial advancements, eventually integrating time series generation into broader machine learning and AI ecosystems efficiently.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets