Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Derandomized Non-Abelian Homomorphism Testing in Low Soundness Regime (2405.18998v2)

Published 29 May 2024 in cs.CC, cs.DM, math.GR, and math.RT

Abstract: We give a randomness-efficient homomorphism test in the low soundness regime for functions, $f: G\to \mathbb{U}_t$, from an arbitrary finite group $G$ to $t\times t$ unitary matrices. We show that if such a function passes a derandomized Blum--Luby--Rubinfeld (BLR) test (using small-bias sets), then (i) it correlates with a function arising from a genuine homomorphism, and (ii) it has a non-trivial Fourier mass on a low-dimensional irreducible representation. In the full randomness regime, such a test for matrix-valued functions on finite groups implicitly appears in the works of Gowers and Hatami [Sbornik: Mathematics '17], and Moore and Russell [SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics '15]. Thus, our work can be seen as a near-optimal derandomization of their results. Our key technical contribution is a "degree-2 expander mixing lemma'' that shows that Gowers' $\mathrm{U}2$ norm can be efficiently estimated by restricting it to a small-bias subset. Another corollary is a "derandomized'' version of a useful lemma due to Babai, Nikolov, and Pyber [SODA'08] and Gowers [Comb. Probab. Comput.'08].

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. Simple constructions of almost k𝑘kitalic_k-wise independent random variables. Random Structures & Algorithms, 3(3):289–304, 1992.
  2. Random Cayley Graphs and Expanders. 5(2):271–285, 1994. doi:10.1002/rsa.3240050203.
  3. Linearity testing in characteristic two. In Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 432–441, 1995.
  4. Near representations of finite groups, 2003. Manuscript.
  5. Mixing of 3-term progressions in Quasirandom Groups. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022), pages 20:1–20:9, 2022. arXiv:2109.12627, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.20.
  6. Optimal inapproximability of satisfiable k-LIN over non-abelian groups. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2021. doi:10.1145/3406325.3451003.
  7. On approximability of satisfiable k-CSPs: I. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2022. doi:10.1145/3519935.3520028.
  8. Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 73–83, 1990. doi:10.1145/100216.100225.
  9. Product growth and mixing in finite groups. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2008.
  10. Non-Abelian homomorphism testing, and distributions close to their self-convolutions. Random Structures & Algorithms, 32(1):49–70, August 2007. doi:10.1002/rsa.20182.
  11. On approximate group homomorphisms. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 462(1):505–520, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.02.017.
  12. Randomness-efficient low degree tests and short PCPs via Î”đœ€\varepsilonitalic_Δ-biased sets. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 612–621, 2003. doi:10.1145/780542.780631.
  13. Operator algebraic approach to inverse and stability theorems for amenable groups. Mathematika, 65(1):98–118, August 2018. arXiv:1706.04544, doi:10.1112/s0025579318000335.
  14. Improved pseudorandom generators for depth 2 circuits. In Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques, 2010. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15369-3_38.
  15. P. Eymard. L’algĂ©bre de Fourier d’un groupe localement compact. Bulletin de la SociĂ©tĂ© MathĂ©matique de France, 92:181–236, 1964. doi:10.24033/bsmf.1607.
  16. Ilijas Farah. Approximate homomorphisms II: Group homomorphisms. Combinatorica, 20(1):47–60, 2000. doi:10.1007/s004930070030.
  17. On a conjecture of marton, 2023. arXiv:2311.05762.
  18. Inverse and stability theorems for approximate representations of finite groups. Sbornik: Mathematics, 208(12):1784, 2017. arXiv:1510.04085, doi:10.1070/SM8872.
  19. W. T. Gowers. Quasirandom Groups. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 17(3):363–387, May 2008. arXiv:0710.3877, doi:10.1017/S0963548307008826.
  20. A quantitative version of the idempotent theorem in harmonic analysis. Annals of Mathematics, 168(3):1025–1054, November 2008. doi:10.4007/annals.2008.168.1025.
  21. Paradigms for unconditional pseudorandom generators. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 16(1-2):1–210, 2024. doi:10.1561/0400000109.
  22. Dimension-free bounds and structural results in communication complexity. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 253(2):555–616, October 2022. doi:10.1007/s11856-022-2365-8.
  23. Expander graphs and their applications. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 43(04):439–562, 2006. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-06-01126-8.
  24. Simple analysis of graph tests for linearity and PCP. Random Structures & Algorithms, 22(2):139–160, 2003. doi:10.1002/rsa.10068.
  25. Almost Ramanujan Expanders from Arbitrary Expanders via Operator Amplification. In Proceedings of the 63rd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2022. arXiv:2209.07024, doi:10.1109/FOCS54457.2022.00043.
  26. MIP* = RE. Commun. ACM, 64(11):131–138, 2021. doi:10.1145/3485628.
  27. Martin Kassabov. Symmetric groups and expander graphs. Inventiones mathematicae, 170(2):327–354, November 2007. doi:10.1007/s00222-007-0065-y.
  28. M. Kiwi. Algebraic testing and weight distributions of codes. Theoretical Computer Science, 299(1):81–106, 2003. doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(02)00816-2.
  29. Learning decision trees using the fourier spectrum. SIAM Journal on Computing, 22(6):1331–1348, 1993. doi:10.1137/0222080.
  30. Z. Kelley and R. Meka. Strong bounds for 3-progressions. In Proceedings of the 64th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 933–973, 2023. arXiv:2302.05537, doi:10.1109/FOCS57990.2023.00059.
  31. Universal lattices and Property Ï„đœ\tauitalic_τ. Inventiones mathematicae, 165(1):209–224, July 2006. arXiv:math/0502112, doi:10.1007/s00222-005-0498-0.
  32. Alexander Lubotzky. Finite simple groups of Lie type as expanders. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, pages 1331–1341, 2011. doi:10.4171/JEMS/282.
  33. Approximate representations, approximate homomorphisms, and low-dimensional embeddings of groups. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 29(1):182–197, 2015. arXiv:1009.6230, doi:10.1137/140958578.
  34. J. Naor and M. Naor. Small-bias probability spaces: efficient constructions and applications. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 213–223, 1990. doi:10.1137/0222053.
  35. J. Naor and M. Naor. Small-bias probability spaces: efficient constructions and applications. SIAM Journal on Computing, 22(4):838–856, 1993. doi:10.1137/0222053.
  36. A quantum linearity test for robustly verifying entanglement. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2017. doi:10.1145/3055399.3055468.
  37. Explicit orthogonal and unitary designs. In Proceedings of the 64th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2023. doi:10.1109/FOCS57990.2023.00073.
  38. A. Samorodnitsky. Low-degree tests at large distances. In Proceedings of the 39th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 506–515, 2007.
  39. Tom Sanders. A Quantitative Version of the Non-Abelian Idempotent Theorem. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 21(1):141–221, February 2011. doi:10.1007/s00039-010-0107-2.
  40. Tom Sanders. On the Bogolyubov-Ruzsa lemma. Analysis & PDE, 5(3), 2012. arXiv:1011.0107, doi:10.2140/apde.2012.5.627.
  41. Tom Sanders. Coset decision trees and the Fourier algebra. Journal d’Analyse MathĂ©matique, 144(1):227–259, December 2021. doi:10.1007/s11854-021-0179-y.
  42. A PCP characterization of NP with optimal amortized query complexity. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2000. doi:10.1145/335305.335329.
  43. On the Structure of Boolean Functions with Small Spectral Norm. Computational Complexity, 26(1):229–273, March 2017. doi:10.1007/s00037-015-0110-y.
  44. Derandomizing Homomorphism Testing in General Groups. In Proceedings of the 36th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, page 18, 2004. doi:10.1137/S009753970444658X.
  45. Derandomizing the Ahlswede-Winter matrix-valued Chernoff bound using pessimistic estimators, and applications. Theory of Computing, 4(3):53–76, 2008. doi:10.4086/toc.2008.v004a003.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that if a matrix-valued function passes a derandomized BLR test, it either closely approximates a true homomorphism or exhibits significant low-dimensional Fourier mass.
  • The authors introduce a degree-2 expander mixing lemma that efficiently estimates the Gowers U-norm while reducing the required random bits to near-optimal levels.
  • These insights have practical implications for probabilistically checkable proofs, quantum complexity, and locally testable codes, paving the way for more resource-efficient algorithms.

Derandomized Non-Abelian Homomorphism Testing in Low Soundness Regime

The paper, "Derandomized Non-Abelian Homomorphism Testing in Low Soundness Regime" by Mittal and Roy, addresses the complexity of analyzing functions from a finite group GG to t×tt \times t unitary matrices. It develops a randomness-efficient homomorphism test in low soundness regimes, leveraging small-bias sets.

Overview of Contributions

Key Results

  1. Correlation with Homomorphisms:
    • The authors prove that if a function f:G→U(t)f: G \rightarrow U(t) passes the derandomized three-query Blum--Luby--Rubinfeld (BLR) test with some probability, it either closely correlates with a function derived from a genuine homomorphism or demonstrates significant Fourier mass on a low-dimensional irreducible representation.
    • This test uses a reduced number of random bits—approaching the optimal (1+o(1))log⁥∣G∣(1+o(1))\log |G| bits required for non-Abelian groups, which is a noteworthy improvement over prior work by Gowers and Hatami (2017), and Moore and Russell (2015).
  2. Technical Contributions:
    • The central technical advancement introduced is a "degree-2 expander mixing lemma," which enables efficient estimation of Gowers' UU-norm when restricted to small-bias subsets.
    • A corollary from this is a "derandomized" version of a lemma from Babai, Nikolov, and Pyber (2008), utilized in analyzing mixing in progressions and hardness of approximation.

Theoretical Implications

The insights provided by Mittal and Roy extend beyond mere randomness-efficient testing. They lay the groundwork for further explorations in non-Abelian homomorphism testing. Specifically, the Fourier analysis and the segmental construct of irreducible representations reveal deeper connections between structure and randomness within groups. The degree-2 expander mixing lemma, in particular, might find broader applications in spectral graph theory and communication complexity.

Practical Implications

This research carries significant implications for probabilistically checkable proofs (PCPs), quantum complexity, and locally testable codes, among other areas. By reducing randomness in testing, one can construct more resource-efficient algorithms. Such developments are crucial in settings involving large-scale computations or limited random sources, demonstrating practical relevance across multiple domains in theoretical computer science and quantum information science.

Future Directions

The implications of these results suggest several avenues for future explorations:

  • Approximation Algorithms: The connection with small-bias sets and Fourier analysis can be exploited to create approximation algorithms with enhanced performance guarantees.
  • Quantum Homomorphism Testing: The constraints of quantum measurements and the specific structure of groups like the Pauli group call for a refined quantum testing framework, leveraging the some techniques developed in this work.
  • Algorithmic Expansions: Extending the methods and findings to broader classes of groups, including infinite groups or more complex structures beyond matrix-valued functions, can yield deeper insights.

The research by Mittal and Roy delineates a sophisticated approach to derandomizing homomorphism tests, pushing the boundaries in low-soundness regimes and providing crucial technical tools for future advancements in both theoretical and practical facets of computational group theory and complexity theory.