Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Comparing Lazy Constraint Selection Strategies in Train Routing with Moving Block Control (2405.18977v2)

Published 29 May 2024 in eess.SY, cs.CE, and cs.SY

Abstract: Railroad transportation plays a vital role in the future of sustainable mobility. Besides building new infrastructure, capacity can be improved by modern train control systems, e.g., based on moving blocks. At the same time, there is only limited work on how to optimally route trains using the potential gained by these systems. Recently, an initial approach for train routing with moving block control has been proposed to address this demand. However, detailed evaluations on so-called lazy constraints are missing, and no publicly available implementation exists. In this work, we close this gap by providing an extended approach as well as a flexible open-source implementation that can use different solving strategies. Using that, we experimentally evaluate what choices should be made when implementing a lazy constraint approach. The corresponding implementation and benchmarks are publicly available as part of the Munich Train Control Toolkit (MTCT) at https://github.com/cda-tum/mtct.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. T. Schlechte, R. Borndörfer, J. Denißen, S. Heller, T. Klug, M. Küpper, N. Lindner, M. Reuther, A. Söhlke, and W. Steadman, “Timetable optimization for a moving block system,” Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, vol. 22, p. 100315, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100315
  2. T. Klug, M. Reuther, and T. Schlechte, “Does laziness pay off? - a lazy-constraint approach to timetabling,” in 22nd Symposium on Algorithmic Approaches for Transportation Modelling, Optimization, and Systems (ATMOS 2022), M. D’Emidio and N. Lindner, Eds., vol. 106.   Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ATMOS.2022.11
  3. Siemens, Bombardier, Mermec, Network Rail, and Thales, “Deliverable D4.2 moving block enhancements,” in X2Rail-5 Completion of activities for Adaptable Communication, Moving Block, Fail Safe Train Localisation (including satellite), Zero on site Testing, Formal Methods and Cyber Security.   Shift2Rail, Apr. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://projects.shift2rail.org/s2r_ip2_n.aspx?p=X2RAIL-5
  4. Siemens, Hitachi Rail STS, Bombardier, Thales, Network Rail, Alstom, CAF, Trafikverket, AZD, Mermec, Deutsche Bahn, SNCF, and ERTMS Users Group, “Deliverable D5.1 moving block system specification,” in X2Rail-1 Start-up activities for Advanced Signalling and Automation Systems.   Shift2Rail, Jul. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://projects.shift2rail.org/s2r_ip2_n.aspx?p=X2RAIL-1
  5. S. Engels, T. Peham, J. Przigoda, N. Przigoda, and R. Wille, “Design tasks and their complexity for Hybrid Level 3 of the European Train Control System,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.02572
  6. R. Wille, T. Peham, J. Przigoda, and N. Przigoda, “Towards automatic design and verification for Level 3 of the European Train Control System,” in 2021 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).   IEEE, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.23919/date51398.2021.9473935
  7. T. Peham, J. Przigoda, N. Przigoda, and R. Wille, “Optimal railway routing using virtual subsections,” in Reliability, Safety, and Security of Railway Systems. Modelling, Analysis, Verification, and Certification.   Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 63–79. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05814-1_5
  8. S. Engels, T. Peham, and R. Wille, “A symbolic design method for ETCS Hybrid Level 3 at different degrees of accuracy.”   Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4230/OASICS.ATMOS.2023.6
  9. DB InfraGO AG, “Richtlinie 301: Signalbuch,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.dbinfrago.com/web/schienennetz/netzzugang-und-regulierung/regelwerke/betrieblich-technisch_regelwerke
  10. Gurobi Optimization, LLC, “Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.gurobi.com
  11. M. Bartholomeus, L. Arenas, R. Treydel, F. Hausmann, N. Geduhn, and A. Bossy, “ERTMS Hybrid Level 3,” SIGNAL + DRAHT (110) 1+2/2018, pp. 15–22, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.eurailpress.de/fileadmin/user_upload/SD_1_2-2018_Bartholomaeus_ua.pdf
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com