Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Contextual Position Encoding: Learning to Count What's Important (2405.18719v2)

Published 29 May 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI
Contextual Position Encoding: Learning to Count What's Important

Abstract: The attention mechanism is a critical component of LLMs that allows tokens in a sequence to interact with each other, but is order-invariant. Incorporating position encoding (PE) makes it possible to address by position, such as attending to the i-th token. However, current PE methods use token counts to derive position, and thus cannot generalize to higher levels of abstraction, such as attending to the i-th sentence. In this paper, we propose a new position encoding method, Contextual Position Encoding (CoPE), that allows positions to be conditioned on context by incrementing position only on certain tokens determined by the model. This allows more general position addressing such as attending to the $i$-th particular word, noun, or sentence. We show that CoPE can solve the selective copy, counting and Flip-Flop tasks where popular position embeddings fail, and improves perplexity on LLMing and coding tasks.

Contextual Position Encoding: Learning to Count What's Important

The paper "Contextual Position Encoding: Learning to Count What's Important," by Golovneva et al., addresses a fundamental limitation of current Position Encoding (PE) methods in LLMs. The paper introduces "Contextual Position Encoding" (CoPE), a novel method that allows for advanced position addressing conditioned on context, enhancing LLMs' ability to handle complex tasks involving higher levels of abstraction.

The attention mechanism in Transformers, which is pivotal for LLMs, does not natively incorporate position information, treating sequences as sets. Traditional PE methods, which typically use token count to derive position, fail to generalize beyond tokens to more abstract units such as sentences or specific parts of speech. To tackle this limitation, CoPE proposes a more flexible and context-aware approach to position encoding.

Key Contributions

  1. Context-Dependent Position Measurement:
    • Unlike traditional PE methods that depend solely on token count, CoPE determines positions based on contextual significance. By computing gate values conditioned on token context, CoPE dynamically adjusts position increments, enabling the model to attend to more semantically meaningful units like sentences or specific word types.
  2. Improvement on Various Tasks:
    • The paper demonstrates CoPE's superior performance on several tasks. In the flip-flop task, CoPE achieved significantly lower error rates compared to absolute and relative PE methods, particularly excelling in out-of-domain (OOD) scenarios. Similarly, CoPE outperformed in the selective copy and counting tasks by effectively managing the contextual positioning of tokens that traditional methods failed to address accurately.
  3. Theoretical and Practical Implications:
    • The proposed method shows potential for better generalization in LLMing tasks, as evidenced by experiments on datasets like Wikitext-103 and a domain-specific code dataset. CoPE's ability to represent counts of abstract units like sentences enables it to address tasks that are challenging for existing models, including those that demand robust reasoning over long sequences.

Theoretical Insights

Incorporating context into position encoding bridges the gap between positional and semantic information, which is traditionally handled separately in LLMs. By devising a gating mechanism that directly interlinks positional embedding with context, CoPE offers a unified framework that can scale across various abstraction levels. This not only addresses the inefficiencies in handling variable-length units within sequences but also facilitates long-range dependencies in text, which is crucial for tasks requiring detailed context comprehension.

Empirical Results

  1. Flip-Flop Task:
    • CoPE reduced the error rate to 0.0% in in-domain tests and achieved a substantial improvement in OOD scenarios with an error rate of 4.9%, whereas traditional methods exhibited much higher error rates.
  2. Selective Copy Task:
    • CoPE demonstrated flawless performance with 0.0% in-distribution error and OOD error rates, starkly contrasting with the failure rates of other positioning methods.
  3. Language and Code Modeling:
    • CoPE achieved improved perplexity on the Wikitext-103 dataset, outperforming traditional PE methods both in in-domain and extended context length evaluations. On the code modeling dataset, it also presented superior results with a test perplexity score of 3.9 against 4.1 of the RoPE.

Future Implications

The introduction of CoPE opens up a myriad of possibilities for future research:

  • Enhanced Sequence Modeling:
    • Models incorporating CoPE can be expected to perform better on tasks involving hierarchical structures, like paragraphs in long documents or scenes in video and speech data.
  • Model Efficiency:
    • By integrating context into position addressing more naturally, CoPE could streamline models, potentially reducing the need for elaborate position-specific training while enhancing their adaptability.
  • Refinement and Extensions:
    • Further research can explore combining CoPE with other improvements in transformer architectures, examining its effects on extensive multimodal datasets, and assessing its scalability in larger models and longer training contexts.

Conclusion

Contextual Position Encoding represents a significant advancement in the field of PE methods for LLMs. By conditioning positions on contextual information, CoPE manages to accurately encode more complex positional relationships that are vital for higher-level text and code comprehension tasks. The experimental results demonstrate substantial improvements over traditional PE methods, both in terms of performance and generalization across varied contexts, marking it a promising direction for future LLM research and applications.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. CoRR, abs/1409.0473, 2014.
  2. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning, pages 160–167, 2008.
  3. Transformer-xl: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019.
  4. Position information in transformers: An overview. Computational Linguistics, 48(3):733–763, 2022.
  5. Convolutional sequence to sequence learning. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1243–1252. PMLR, 2017.
  6. Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752, 2023.
  7. Transformer language models without positional encodings still learn positional information. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, 2022.
  8. Mistral 7b. ArXiv, abs/2310.06825, 2023.
  9. Exposing attention glitches with flip-flop language modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  10. Pointer sentinel mixture models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  11. On the relation between position information and sentence length in neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), 2019.
  12. Train short, test long: Attention with linear biases enables input length extrapolation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  13. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019.
  14. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of machine learning research, 21(140):1–67, 2020.
  15. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2016.
  16. Self-attention with relative position representations. In North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018.
  17. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding. Neurocomputing, 568:127063, 2024.
  18. End-to-end memory networks. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015.
  19. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. ArXiv, abs/2302.13971, 2023a.
  20. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. ArXiv, abs/2307.09288, 2023b.
  21. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  22. R-transformer: Recurrent neural network enhanced transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05572, 2019.
  23. Memory networks. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, 2015.
  24. Length extrapolation of transformers: A survey from the perspective of position encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17044, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Olga Golovneva (17 papers)
  2. Tianlu Wang (33 papers)
  3. Jason Weston (130 papers)
  4. Sainbayar Sukhbaatar (53 papers)
Citations (17)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Reddit Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com