Secure Hierarchical Federated Learning in Vehicular Networks Using Dynamic Client Selection and Anomaly Detection (2405.17497v1)
Abstract: Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL) faces the significant challenge of adversarial or unreliable vehicles in vehicular networks, which can compromise the model's integrity through misleading updates. Addressing this, our study introduces a novel framework that integrates dynamic vehicle selection and robust anomaly detection mechanisms, aiming to optimize participant selection and mitigate risks associated with malicious contributions. Our approach involves a comprehensive vehicle reliability assessment, considering historical accuracy, contribution frequency, and anomaly records. An anomaly detection algorithm is utilized to identify anomalous behavior by analyzing the cosine similarity of local or model parameters during the federated learning (FL) process. These anomaly records are then registered and combined with past performance for accuracy and contribution frequency to identify the most suitable vehicles for each learning round. Dynamic client selection and anomaly detection algorithms are deployed at different levels, including cluster heads (CHs), cluster members (CMs), and the Evolving Packet Core (EPC), to detect and filter out spurious updates. Through simulation-based performance evaluation, our proposed algorithm demonstrates remarkable resilience even under intense attack conditions. Even in the worst-case scenarios, it achieves convergence times at $63$\% as effective as those in scenarios without any attacks. Conversely, in scenarios without utilizing our proposed algorithm, there is a high likelihood of non-convergence in the FL process.
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2023.
- L. Liu, J. Zhang, S. Song, and K. B. Letaief, “Client-edge-cloud hierarchical federated learning,” in ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6, 2020.
- M. S. H. Abad, E. Ozfatura, D. GUndUz, and O. Ercetin, “Hierarchical federated learning across heterogeneous cellular networks,” in ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 8866–8870, 2020.
- T. Chen, J. Yan, Y. Sun, S. Zhou, D. Gündüz, and Z. Niu, “Mobility accelerates learning: Convergence analysis on hierarchical federated learning in vehicular networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09656, 2024.
- Q. Chen, Z. You, and H. Jiang, “Semi-asynchronous hierarchical federated learning for cooperative intelligent transportation systems,” 2021.
- M. S. HaghighiFard and S. Coleri, “Hierarchical federated learning in multi-hop cluster-based vanets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10361, 2024.
- G. Xia, J. Chen, C. Yu, and J. Ma, “Poisoning attacks in federated learning: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 10708–10722, 2023.
- K. N. Kumar, C. K. Mohan, and L. R. Cenkeramaddi, “The impact of adversarial attacks on federated learning: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pp. 1–20, 2023.
- X. Cao and N. Gong, “Mpaf: Model poisoning attacks to federated learning based on fake clients,” in 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), (Los Alamitos, CA, USA), pp. 3395–3403, IEEE Computer Society, jun 2022.
- M. T. Hossain, S. Islam, S. Badsha, and H. Shen, “Desmp: Differential privacy-exploited stealthy model poisoning attacks in federated learning,” in 2021 17th International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN), pp. 167–174, 2021.
- J. Sun, A. Li, L. DiValentin, A. Hassanzadeh, Y. Chen, and H. Li, “Fl-wbc: Enhancing robustness against model poisoning attacks in federated learning from a client perspective,” 2021.
- X. You, Z. Liu, X. Yang, and X. Ding, “Poisoning attack detection using client historical similarity in non-iid environments,” in 2022 12th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), pp. 439–447, 2022.
- M. Khorramfar, “Securing federated learning model aggregation against poisoning attacks via credit-based client selection,” Aug 2023.
- D. N. Yaldiz, T. Zhang, and S. Avestimehr, “Secure federated learning against model poisoning attacks via client filtering,” 2023.
- J. B. Kenney, “Dedicated short-range communications (dsrc) standards in the united states,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 7, pp. 1162–1182, 2011.
- M. Noor-A-Rahim, Z. Liu, H. Lee, M. O. Khyam, J. He, D. Pesch, K. Moessner, W. Saad, and H. V. Poor, “6g for vehicle-to-everything (v2x) communications: Enabling technologies, challenges, and opportunities,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 712–734, 2022.
- H. Seo, K.-D. Lee, S. Yasukawa, Y. Peng, and P. Sartori, “Lte evolution for vehicle-to-everything services,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 22–28, 2016.
- H. Bagheri, M. Noor-A-Rahim, Z. Liu, H. Lee, D. Pesch, K. Moessner, and P. Xiao, “5g nr-v2x: Toward connected and cooperative autonomous driving,” IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 2021.
- MIT Press, 2016.
- J. Posner, L. Tseng, M. Aloqaily, and Y. Jararweh, “Federated learning in vehicular networks: Opportunities and solutions,” IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 152–159, 2021.
- M. Sepulcre, M. Gonzalez-Martín, J. Gozalvez, R. Molina-Masegosa, and B. Coll-Perales, “Analytical models of the performance of ieee 802.11p vehicle to vehicle communications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 713–724, 2022.
- 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 ghz,” Tech. Rep. TR 38.901, 3GPP, 2017.
- H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1273–1282, PMLR, 2017.