Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

$\textit{Trans-LoRA}$: towards data-free Transferable Parameter Efficient Finetuning (2405.17258v1)

Published 27 May 2024 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: Low-rank adapters (LoRA) and their variants are popular parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) techniques that closely match full model fine-tune performance while requiring only a small number of additional parameters. These additional LoRA parameters are specific to the base model being adapted. When the base model needs to be deprecated and replaced with a new one, all the associated LoRA modules need to be re-trained. Such re-training requires access to the data used to train the LoRA for the original base model. This is especially problematic for commercial cloud applications where the LoRA modules and the base models are hosted by service providers who may not be allowed to host proprietary client task data. To address this challenge, we propose $\textit{Trans-LoRA}$ -- a novel method for lossless, nearly data-free transfer of LoRAs across base models. Our approach relies on synthetic data to transfer LoRA modules. Using LLMs, we design a synthetic data generator to approximate the data-generating process of the $\textit{observed}$ task data subset. Training on the resulting synthetic dataset transfers LoRA modules to new models. We show the effectiveness of our approach using both LLama and Gemma model families. Our approach achieves lossless (mostly improved) LoRA transfer between models within and across different base model families, and even between different PEFT methods, on a wide variety of tasks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (73)
  1. How protective are synthetic data? In International Conference on Privacy in Statistical Databases, pages 239–246. Springer, 2008.
  2. AI@Meta. Llama 3 model card. 2024.
  3. Towards understanding ensemble, knowledge distillation and self-distillation in deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.09816, 2020.
  4. Anthropic. The claude 3 model family: Opus, sonnet, haiku, 2024.
  5. Program synthesis with large language models, 2021.
  6. Distilling from professors: Enhancing the knowledge distillation of teachers. Information sciences, 576:743–755, 2021.
  7. A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data. Knowledge and information systems, 34:483–519, 2013.
  8. Synthetic data for annotation and extraction of family history information from clinical text. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 12:1–11, 2021.
  9. Weak-to-strong generalization: Eliciting strong capabilities with weak supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09390, 2023.
  10. Training verifiers to solve math word problems, 2021.
  11. Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE signal processing magazine, 35(1):53–65, 2018.
  12. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large-scale pre-trained language models. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(3):220–235, 2023.
  13. Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models, 2024a.
  14. Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology, 2024b.
  15. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models, 2023.
  16. Gpt-4 technical report, 2024c.
  17. On the effectiveness of parameter-efficient fine-tuning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 12799–12807, 2023.
  18. A framework for few-shot language model evaluation, 2023.
  19. Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM, 63(11):139–144, 2020.
  20. Knowledge distillation: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision, 129(6):1789–1819, 2021.
  21. A kernel two-sample test. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13(25):723–773, 2012.
  22. Neural grammatical error correction systems with unsupervised pre-training on synthetic data. In 14th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pages 252–263. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019.
  23. A review on generative adversarial networks: Algorithms, theory, and applications. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 35(4):3313–3332, 2021.
  24. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for large models: A comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14608, 2024.
  25. On the effectiveness of adapter-based tuning for pretrained language model adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03164, 2021.
  26. Generate, annotate, and learn: Nlp with synthetic text. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:826–842, 2022.
  27. Measuring massive multitask language understanding, 2021.
  28. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531, 2015.
  29. Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2790–2799. PMLR, 2019.
  30. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models, 2021a.
  31. Knowledgeable prompt-tuning: Incorporating knowledge into prompt verbalizer for text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02035, 2021b.
  32. Robust visual domain adaptation with low-rank reconstruction. In 2012 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2168–2175. IEEE, 2012.
  33. Knowledge distillation: Bad models can be good role models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:28683–28694, 2022.
  34. Sequence-level knowledge distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07947, 2016.
  35. Nola: Compressing lora using linear combination of random basis, 2024.
  36. The power of scale for parameter-efficient prompt tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08691, 2021.
  37. Synthetic data (almost) from scratch: Generalized instruction tuning for language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13064, 2024.
  38. Few-shot parameter-efficient fine-tuning is better and cheaper than in-context learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:1950–1965, 2022.
  39. Is your code generated by chatGPT really correct? rigorous evaluation of large language models for code generation. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  40. Is your code generated by chatgpt really correct? rigorous evaluation of large language models for code generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024a.
  41. Coupled generative adversarial networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
  42. Dora: Weight-decomposed low-rank adaptation, 2024b.
  43. Improved knowledge distillation via teacher assistant. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 5191–5198, 2020.
  44. Orca 2: Teaching small language models how to reason. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11045, 2023.
  45. Self-distillation amplifies regularization in hilbert space. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:3351–3361, 2020.
  46. Orca: Progressive learning from complex explanation traces of gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02707, 2023.
  47. Sergey I Nikolenko. Synthetic data for deep learning. Springer, 2021.
  48. OpenAI. https://openai.com/index/gpt-3-5-turbo-fine-tuning-and-api-updates. 2024.
  49. Relational knowledge distillation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3967–3976, 2019.
  50. The synthetic data vault. In 2016 IEEE international conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA), pages 399–410. IEEE, 2016.
  51. Towards understanding knowledge distillation. In International conference on machine learning, pages 5142–5151. PMLR, 2019.
  52. Efficient domain generalization via common-specific low-rank decomposition. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7728–7738. PMLR, 2020.
  53. Training question answering models from synthetic data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.09599, 2020.
  54. S-lora: Serving thousands of concurrent lora adapters, 2023.
  55. Mpnet: Masked and permuted pre-training for language understanding, 2020.
  56. Lab: Large-scale alignment for chatbots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01081, 2024.
  57. Vl-adapter: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for vision-and-language tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5227–5237, 2022.
  58. Challenging big-bench tasks and whether chain-of-thought can solve them, 2022.
  59. Stanford alpaca: An instruction-following llama model. https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca, 2023.
  60. Training deep networks with synthetic data: Bridging the reality gap by domain randomization. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 969–977, 2018.
  61. Efficient knowledge distillation from model checkpoints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:607–619, 2022a.
  62. Synthetic data made to order: The case of parsing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2018.
  63. Self-instruct: Aligning language models with self-generated instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10560, 2022b.
  64. Multitask prompt tuning enables parameter-efficient transfer learning, 2023.
  65. Wizardlm: Empowering large language models to follow complex instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12244, 2023.
  66. On compressing deep models by low rank and sparse decomposition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7370–7379, 2017.
  67. Bitfit: Simple parameter-efficient fine-tuning for transformer-based masked language-models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10199, 2021.
  68. The expressive power of low-rank adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17513, 2023.
  69. Be your own teacher: Improve the performance of convolutional neural networks via self distillation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 3713–3722, 2019.
  70. Self-distillation: Towards efficient and compact neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(8):4388–4403, 2021a.
  71. Unsupervised domain adaptation with adapter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00667, 2021b.
  72. Self-distillation as instance-specific label smoothing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:2184–2195, 2020.
  73. Low-rank plus diagonal adaptation for deep neural networks. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 5005–5009. IEEE, 2016.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Runqian Wang (3 papers)
  2. Soumya Ghosh (39 papers)
  3. David Cox (48 papers)
  4. Diego Antognini (27 papers)
  5. Aude Oliva (42 papers)
  6. Rogerio Feris (105 papers)
  7. Leonid Karlinsky (79 papers)

Summary

  • The paper introduces Trans-LoRA, a novel method enabling transferable parameter efficient finetuning without accessing original task data.
  • It leverages synthetic data generation, discriminator filtering, and knowledge distillation to adapt LoRA models between different base models.
  • Experimental results show up to 10% performance gains, offering a scalable solution for confidential, cloud-based AI services.

An Overview of Trans-LoRA: Towards Data-Free Transferable Parameter Efficient Finetuning

The paper "Trans-LoRA: Towards Data-Free Transferable Parameter Efficient Finetuning" addresses a significant challenge within the field of Parameter Efficient Finetuning (PEFT)—namely, the dependence of Low-Rank Adapters (LoRA) and other PEFT methods on base models that are often subject to deprecation and replacement. The proposed Trans-LoRA method offers a novel solution by allowing LoRA models to be transferred between different base models without accessing original task-specific data, leveraging synthetic data generation and a discriminative filtering process.

Introduction

The advancements in LLMs have multiplied the parameters into billions, necessitating fine-tuning for downstream tasks to achieve enhanced specialization. Conventional fine-tuning is resource-intensive, especially for large-scale deployment, prompting the need for PEFT techniques like LoRA. LoRA adapts models by training a minimal number of additional parameters atop a frozen pre-trained model. However, when the underlying base model is deprecated, all associated LoRA models must be retrained, which is impractical in many cloud-based applications due to client confidentiality constraints.

Trans-LoRA: Approach and Methodology

Trans-LoRA introduces a mechanism for transferring LoRA models to new base models using synthetic data. The key steps in the Trans-LoRA approach include:

  1. Synthetic Data Generation: Using a LLM to simulate the data-generating process of the original task. This involves creating synthetic prompt-completion pairs that approximate the original task-specific data.
  2. Discriminator Training: A discriminator model is trained on a mix of synthetic and real data, filtering the generated synthetic data to closely resemble the original task distribution. This step ensures the quality and relevance of the synthetic data used in transfer.
  3. Knowledge Distillation: Transferring the capabilities of the source LoRA to the target LoRA through knowledge distillation on the filtered synthetic data.

The paper details a dual-model framework, utilizing a discriminator to filter non-representative synthetic data and ensure high fidelity to the original task distribution, thereby improving the effectiveness of knowledge distillation.

Experimental Validation

The efficacy of Trans-LoRA was validated through extensive experiments involving multiple LLM families (Llama2 and Gemma) and a variety of tasks drawn from datasets such as BBH, MMLU, GSM8K, and MBPP. The results consistently demonstrated that Trans-LoRA not only achieves lossless transfer but also enhances performance beyond that of either the source LoRA or the target base model.

Key numerical results include:

  • Performance improvements of up to 10% in some tasks.
  • Robust performance in transferring within and across different model families and PEFT variants.

Implications and Future Directions

Practical Implications: The ability of Trans-LoRA to perform nearly data-free transfers has significant implications for cloud-based AI services, where client data confidentiality is paramount. This method allows for centralized and automated model transfers without demanding retraining from clients, simplifying logistics and enhancing scalability.

Theoretical Implications: The work opens avenues for exploring synthetic data utility beyond general model training, particularly in PEFT contexts. It demonstrates that carefully curated synthetic data, combined with discriminator models, can approximate the required training distributions effectively for knowledge transfer tasks.

Future Directions: Potential future research could focus on minimizing the computational overhead required for data synthesis and discriminator training. Additionally, exploring direct PEFT transfer mechanisms without synthetic data generation could further simplify the approach. There is also scope for extending Trans-LoRA to other modalities and domains, enhancing its applicability.

Conclusion and Limitations

Trans-LoRA offers an innovative solution to the challenge of model dependency in PEFT approaches, leveraging synthetic data to enable nearly data-free model transfer. While it demonstrates substantial performance gains and practical viability, the requirement for synthetic data generation indicates room for optimization. The work holds promise for advancing scalable, confidential, and efficient model serving in AI applications.

The paper contributes to the state-of-the-art in PEFT by addressing a critical gap and providing a robust, theoretically sound framework for model transfer, which can significantly influence future research and application in the AI domain.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com