Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
140 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Gravitational Wave Cosmology: Be Careful of the Black Hole Mass Spectrum (2405.17161v1)

Published 27 May 2024 in gr-qc and astro-ph.CO

Abstract: Gravitational waves (GWs) from compact binary coalescences (CBCs) offer insights into the universe expansion. The spectral siren method, used without electromagnetic counterparts (EMC), infers cosmic expansion (Hubble constant) by relating detector and source frame masses of black hole (BH) mergers. However, heuristic mass models (broken power law, power law plus peak, multipeak) may introduce biases in the Hubble constant estimation, potentially up to 3 sigma with 2000 detected GW mergers. These biases stem from the models inability to consider redshift evolution and unexpected mass features. Future GW cosmology studies should employ adaptable source mass models to address these issues.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. R. Abbott et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. Phys. Rev. X, 13(4):041039, 2023.
  2. R. Abbott et al. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run. Phys. Rev. X, 11:021053, 2021.
  3. R. Abbott et al. GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run. arXiv, 8 2021.
  4. Wendy L. Freedman. Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective. Astrophys. J., 919(1):16, 2021.
  5. Spectral Sirens: Cosmology from the Full Mass Distribution of Compact Binaries. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129(6):061102, 2022.
  6. ICAROGW: A python package for inference of astrophysical population properties of noisy, heterogeneous and incomplete observations. arXiv, 5 2023.
  7. Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift? Astrophys. J. Lett., 863(2):L41, 2018.
  8. On the importance of source population models for gravitational-wave cosmology. Phys. Rev. D, 104(6):062009, 2021.
  9. P. A. R. Ade et al. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys., 594:A13, 2016.
  10. B. P. Abbott et al. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA. Living Rev. Rel., 21(1):3, 2018.
  11. Inferring the properties of a population of compact binaries in presence of selection effects. arXiv, 7 2020.
  12. A novel approach to infer population and cosmological properties with gravitational waves standard sirens and galaxy surveys. arXiv, 5 2023.
  13. R. Abbott et al. Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion History from GWTC–3. Astrophys. J., 949(2):76, 2023.
  14. Rachel Gray et al. Joint cosmological and gravitational-wave population inference using dark sirens and galaxy catalogues. arXiv, 8 2023.
  15. R. Abbott et al. Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. Astrophys. J. Lett., 913(1):L7, 2021.
  16. Measuring the binary black hole mass spectrum with an astrophysically motivated parameterization. Astrophys. J., 856(2):173, 2018.
  17. Suvodip Mukherjee. The redshift dependence of black hole mass distribution: is it reliable for standard sirens cosmology? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 515(4):5495–5505, 2022.
  18. GWSim: Python package for creating mock GW samples for different astrophysical populations and cosmological models of binary black holes. A&A, 677:A124, September 2023.
  19. The cosmic evolution of binary black holes in young, globular, and nuclear star clusters: rates, masses, spins, and mixing fractions. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 511(4):5797–5816, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.