Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 96 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 35 tok/s
GPT-5 High 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 106 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 228 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Prudent Framework for Understanding Risk-Awareness in Demand Response (2405.16356v2)

Published 25 May 2024 in eess.SY, cs.SY, and econ.TH

Abstract: We show that risk-aware behaviors in demand response originate from superquadratic state-dependent cost functions and price uncertainty with skewed distributions. We obtain such results through developing a novel theoretical demand response framework that combines non-anticipatory multi-stage decision-making with superquadratic cost functions. We introduce the concept of prudent demand, defined by a positive third-order derivative of the cost function, which is the first principle for risk-averse behavior despite a risk-neutral objective. Our analysis establishes that future price uncertainty affects immediate consumption decisions, and the extent of this response scales proportionally with the skewness of the price distribution. We visualize our theoretical findings through numerical simulations and illustrate their practical implications using a real-world case study.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (49)
  1. Ameren (n.d.). Power smart pricing plan. https://www.ameren.com/illinois/account/customer-service/bill/power-smart-pricing/.
  2. Data-driven modelling of energy demand response behaviour based on a large-scale residential trial. Energy and AI, 4:100071.
  3. Berger, L. (2016). The impact of ambiguity and prudence on prevention decisions. Theory and Decision, 80:389–409.
  4. Borenstein, S. (2016). The economics of fixed cost recovery by utilities. The Electricity Journal, 29(7):5–12.
  5. Convex optimization. Cambridge university press.
  6. Fair, equitable, and efficient tariffs in the presence of distributed energy resources. Consumer, Prosumer, Prosumager: How Service Innovations will Disrupt the Utility Business Model, 155.
  7. Optimal demand response: Problem formulation and deterministic case. Control and optimization methods for electric smart grids, pages 63–85.
  8. ConEd (n.d.). Con edison time-of-use rates. https://www.coned.com/en/accounts-billing/your-bill/time-of-use.
  9. A survey on demand response in smart grids: Mathematical models and approaches. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11(3):570–582.
  10. Appeals court says state agency set electricity prices too high during 2021 winter storm. The Texas Tribune. https://www.texastribune.org/2023/03/17/puc-appeals-court-uri-prices/.
  11. Ebert, S. (2020). Decision making when things are only a matter of time. Operations Research, 68(5):1564–1575.
  12. Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. Management Science, 57(7):1334–1349.
  13. Joint measurement of risk aversion, prudence, and temperance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48:231–252.
  14. Loss-averse preferences and portfolio choices: An extension. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(1):224–230.
  15. Putting risk in its proper place. American Economic Review, 96(1):280–289.
  16. Ercot (n.d.). Real-time market. https://www.ercot.com/mktinfo/rtm/.
  17. His lights stayed on during texas’ storm. now he owes $16,752. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/20/us/texas-storm-electric-bills.html\#commentsContainer.
  18. Optimal pricing for residential demand response: A stochastic optimization approach. In 2012 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), pages 1879–1884. IEEE.
  19. Dynamic pricing and distributed energy management for demand response. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(2):1128–1136.
  20. Jordehi, A. R. (2019). Optimisation of demand response in electric power systems, a review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 103:308–319.
  21. Electricity tariff design via lens of energy justice. Omega, 117:102822.
  22. Kimball, M. S. (1989). Precautionary saving in the small and in the large.
  23. Data-driven targeting of customers for demand response. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(5):2199–2207.
  24. Should we do more when we know less? the effect of technology risk on optimal effort. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 88(3):695–725.
  25. Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks. In 2011 IEEE power and energy society general meeting, pages 1–8. IEEE.
  26. A distributed online pricing strategy for demand response programs. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(1):350–360.
  27. Energy-sharing model with price-based demand response for microgrids of peer-to-peer prosumers. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(5):3569–3583.
  28. Prudence and prevention–empirical evidence. Available at SSRN 3969646.
  29. Menegatti, M. (2009). Optimal prevention and prudence in a two-period model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 58(3):393–397.
  30. Menegatti, M. (2014). New results on the relationship among risk aversion, prudence and temperance. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3):613–617.
  31. Menegatti, M. (2015). New results on high-order risk changes. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(2):678–681.
  32. Online learning for network constrained demand response pricing in distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(3):2563–2575.
  33. Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE transactions on Smart Grid, 1(3):320–331.
  34. Classifying and modelling demand response in power systems. Energy, 242:122544.
  35. OG&E (n.d.). Smarthours. https://www.oge.com/wps/portal/ord/residential/pricing-options/smart-hours.
  36. Peter, R. (2017). Optimal self-protection in two periods: On the role of endogenous saving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137:19–36.
  37. PG&E (n.d.). Find your best rate plan. https://www.pge.com/en/account/rate-plans/find-your-best-rate-plan.html.
  38. Pratt, J. W. (1978). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. In Uncertainty in economics, pages 59–79. Elsevier.
  39. Qdr, Q. (2006). Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendations for achieving them. US Dept. Energy, Washington, DC, USA, Tech. Rep, 2006.
  40. Sometimes more, sometimes less: Prudence and the diversification of risky insurance coverage. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(2):770–783.
  41. Co-optimization of var and cvar for data-driven stochastic demand response auction. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 4(4):940–945.
  42. Toward a consumer-centric grid: A behavioral perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(4):865–882.
  43. Optimal real-time pricing algorithm based on utility maximization for smart grid. In 2010 First IEEE international conference on smart grid communications, pages 415–420. IEEE.
  44. Lectures on stochastic programming: modeling and theory. SIAM.
  45. SRP (n.d.). Salt river project (srp) time-of-use price plan™ (tou). https://www.srpnet.com/price-plans/residential-electric/time-of-use.
  46. Model predictive control for thermal energy storage and thermal comfort optimization of building demand response in smart grids. Applied Energy, 242:873–882.
  47. Reinforcement learning for demand response: A review of algorithms and modeling techniques. Applied energy, 235:1072–1089.
  48. Energy pricing and dispatch for smart grid retailers under demand response and market price uncertainty. IEEE transactions on smart grid, 6(3):1364–1374.
  49. Arbitraging variable efficiency energy storage using analytical stochastic dynamic programming. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37(6):4785–4795.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com