Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

NMGrad: Advancing Histopathological Bladder Cancer Grading with Weakly Supervised Deep Learning (2405.15275v1)

Published 24 May 2024 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and q-bio.QM

Abstract: The most prevalent form of bladder cancer is urothelial carcinoma, characterized by a high recurrence rate and substantial lifetime treatment costs for patients. Grading is a prime factor for patient risk stratification, although it suffers from inconsistencies and variations among pathologists. Moreover, absence of annotations in medical imaging difficults training deep learning models. To address these challenges, we introduce a pipeline designed for bladder cancer grading using histological slides. First, it extracts urothelium tissue tiles at different magnification levels, employing a convolutional neural network for processing for feature extraction. Then, it engages in the slide-level prediction process. It employs a nested multiple instance learning approach with attention to predict the grade. To distinguish different levels of malignancy within specific regions of the slide, we include the origins of the tiles in our analysis. The attention scores at region level is shown to correlate with verified high-grade regions, giving some explainability to the model. Clinical evaluations demonstrate that our model consistently outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. \bibcommenthead
  2. Teoh, J. Y.-C. et al. (2020). Global trends of bladder cancer incidence and mortality, and their associations with tobacco use and gross domestic product per capita. European urology 78:893–906.
  3. Burger, M. et al. (2013). Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. European urology 63:234–241.
  4. Babjuk, M. et al. (2022). European association of urology guidelines on non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (ta, t1, and carcinoma in situ). European urology 81:75–94.
  5. Eble, J. (2004). World health organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs 68–69.
  6. Tosoni, I. et al. (2000). Clinical significance of interobserver differences in the staging and grading of superficial bladder cancer. BJU International 85.
  7. Netto, G. J. et al. (2022). The 2022 world health organization classification of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs—part b: prostate and urinary tract tumors. European urology .
  8. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, Vol. 38, 440–448.
  9. Reappraisal of the papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (punlmp). Histopathology 77:525–535.
  10. Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic. Nature medicine 27:775–784.
  11. Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis. Computational and structural biotechnology journal 16:34–42.
  12. Artificial intelligence and computational pathology. Laboratory Investigation 101:412–422.
  13. Azam, A. S. et al. (2020). Diagnostic concordance and discordance in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Pathology .
  14. The devil is in the details: Whole slide image acquisition and processing for artifacts detection, color variation, and data augmentation: A review. IEEE Access 10:58821–58844.
  15. Kvikstad, V. et al. (2019). Prognostic value and reproducibility of different microscopic characteristics in the who grading systems for pta and pt1 urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas. Diagnostic pathology 14:1–8.
  16. van der Kwast, T. et al. (2022). International society of urological pathology expert opinion on grading of urothelial carcinoma. European Urology Focus 8:438–446.
  17. Berbís, M. A. et al. (2023). Computational pathology in 2030: a delphi study forecasting the role of ai in pathology within the next decade. EBioMedicine 88.
  18. 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 160–163.
  19. 2022 IEEE 14th Image, Video, and Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop (IVMSP), 1–5.
  20. Cruz-Roa, A. et al. (2018). High-throughput adaptive sampling for whole-slide histopathology image analysis (hashi) via convolutional neural networks: Application to invasive breast cancer detection. PloS one 13:e0196828.
  21. Litjens, G. et al. (2016). Deep learning as a tool for increased accuracy and efficiency of histopathological diagnosis. Scientific reports 6:26286.
  22. Reis, S. et al. (2017). Automated classification of breast cancer stroma maturity from histological images. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 64:2344–2352.
  23. Dundar, M. M. et al. (2011). Computerized classification of intraductal breast lesions using histopathological images. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 58:1977–1984.
  24. 2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 1–5.
  25. Toward more transparent and accurate cancer diagnosis with an unsupervised cae approach. IEEE Access 11:143387–143401.
  26. Deng, R. et al. (2023). Omni-seg: A scale-aware dynamic network for renal pathological image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 70:2636–2644.
  27. Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial intelligence 89:31–71.
  28. A framework for multiple-instance learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 10:570–576.
  29. Multiple instance learning: A survey of problem characteristics and applications. Pattern Recognition 77:329–353.
  30. Mercan, E. et al. (2016). Localization of diagnostically relevant regions of interest in whole slide images: a comparative study. Journal of digital imaging 29:496–506.
  31. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference (ECML PKDD), 737–752.
  32. Learning and interpreting multi-multi-instance learning networks. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 21:7890–7949.
  33. 2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), 220–225.
  34. Khoraminia, F. et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence in digital pathology for bladder cancer: Hype or hope? a systematic review. Cancers 15:4518.
  35. Wetteland, R. et al. (2021). Automatic diagnostic tool for predicting cancer grade in bladder cancer patients using deep learning. IEEE Access 9:115813–115825.
  36. Zheng, Q. et al. (2022). Accurate diagnosis and survival prediction of bladder cancer using deep learning on histological slides. Cancers 14:5807.
  37. Jansen, I. et al. (2020). Automated detection and grading of non–muscle-invasive urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. The American journal of pathology 190:1483–1490.
  38. Spyridonos, P. et al. (2006). Comparative evaluation of support vector machines and probabilistic neural networks in superficial bladder cancer classification. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 6:283–292.
  39. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 6428–6436.
  40. Zhang, Z. et al. (2019). Pathologist-level interpretable whole-slide cancer diagnosis with deep learning. Nature Machine Intelligence 1:236–245.
  41. International conference on machine learning, 2127–2136.
  42. Campanella, G. et al. (2019). Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nature medicine 25:1301–1309.
  43. A multiscale approach for whole-slide image segmentation of five tissue classes in urothelial carcinoma slides. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 19:1533033820946787.
  44. Colour and Visual Computing Symposium, Vol. 2688, 1–15.
  45. 2023 31st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 1045–1049.
  46. Kvikstad, V. (2022). Better prognostic markers for nonmuscle invasive papillary urothelial carcinomas. Ph.D. thesis, Universitetet i Stavanger.
  47. 2021 12th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA), 78–83.
  48. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 25.
  49. 2019 IEEE 16th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), 683–687.
  50. Bergsma, W. (2013). A bias-correction for cramér’s v and tschuprow’s t. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society 42:323–328.
  51. Akoglu, H. (2018). User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish journal of emergency medicine 18:91–93.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com