Robust Economic Dispatch with Flexible Demand and Adjustable Uncertainty Set (2405.15259v3)
Abstract: With more renewable energy sources (RES) integrated into the power system, the intermittency of RES places a heavy burden on the system. The uncertainty of RES is traditionally handled by controllable generators to balance the real time wind power deviation. As the demand side management develops, the flexibility of aggregate loads can be leveraged to mitigate the negative impact of the wind power. In view of this, we study the problem of how to exploit the multi-dimensional flexibility of elastic loads to balance the trade-off between a low generation cost and a low system risk related to the wind curtailment and the power deficiency. These risks are captured by the conditional value-at-risk. Also, unlike most of the existing studies, the uncertainty set of the wind power output in our model is not fixed. By contrast, it is undetermined and co-optimized based on the available load flexibility. We transform the original optimization problem into a convex one using surrogate affine approximation such that it can be solved efficiently. In case studies, we apply our model on a six-bus transmission network and demonstrate that how flexible load aggregators can help to determine the optimal admissible region for the wind power deviations.
- E. Lannoye, D. Flynn, and M. O’Malley, “Evaluation of power system flexibility,” IEEE Trans. on Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 922–931, 2012.
- C. Cecati, C. Citro, and P. Siano, “Combined operations of renewable energy systems and responsive demand in a smart grid,” IEEE Trans. on Sustainable Energy, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 468–476, 2011.
- M. Albadi and E. El-Saadany, “Overview of wind power intermittency impacts on power systems,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 627–632, 2010.
- P. Li, D. Yu, M. Yang, and J. Wang, “Flexible look-ahead dispatch realized by robust optimization considering cvar of wind power,” IEEE Trans. on Power Syst., 2018.
- W. Wei, J. Wang, and S. Mei, “Dispatchability maximization for co-optimized energy and reserve dispatch with explicit reliability guarantee,” IEEE Trans. on Power Syst., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 3276–3288, 2016.
- C. Wang, F. Liu, J. Wang, F. Qiu, W. Wei, S. Mei, and S. Lei, “Robust risk-constrained unit commitment with large-scale wind generation: An adjustable uncertainty set approach,” IEEE Trans. on Power Syst., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 723–733, 2017.
- H. Ye, “Surrogate affine approximation based co-optimization of transactive flexibility, uncertainty, and energy,” IEEE Trans. on Power Syst., 2018.
- C. Wang, F. Liu, J. Wang, W. Wei, and S. Mei, “Risk-based admissibility assessment of wind generation integrated into a bulk power system,” IEEE Trans. on Sustainable Energy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 325–336, 2016.
- W. A. Bukhsh, C. Zhang, and P. Pinson, “An integrated multiperiod opf model with demand response and renewable generation uncertainty,” IEEE Trans. on Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1495–1503, 2016.
- H. Wu, M. Shahidehpour, A. Alabdulwahab, and A. Abusorrah, “Thermal generation flexibility with ramping costs and hourly demand response in stochastic security-constrained scheduling of variable energy sources,” IEEE Trans. on Power Syst., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2955–2964, 2015.
- B. Wang, D. F. Gayme, X. Liu, and C. Yuan, “Optimal siting and sizing of demand response in a transmission constrained system with high wind penetration,” Int. J. of Electr. Power & Energy Syst., vol. 68, pp. 71–80, 2015.
- L. Zhao and B. Zeng, “Robust unit commitment problem with demand response and wind energy,” in Proc. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2012, pp. 1–8.
- H. Falsafi, A. Zakariazadeh, and S. Jadid, “The role of demand response in single and multi-objective wind-thermal generation scheduling: A stochastic programming,” Energy, vol. 64, pp. 853–867, 2014.
- T. Liu, B. Sun, X. Tan, and D. H. Tsang, “Market for multi-dimensional flexibility with parametric demand response bidding,” in IEEE North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2017, pp. 1–6.
- T. Logenthiran, D. Srinivasan, and T. Z. Shun, “Demand side management in smart grid using heuristic optimization,” IEEE Trans. on smart grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1244–1252, 2012.
- B. Sun, X. Tan, and D. H. Tsang, “Eliciting multi-dimensional flexibilities from electric vehicles: A mechanism design approach,” IEEE Trans. on Power Syst., 2018.
- M. Negrete-Pincetic, A. Nayyar, K. Poolla, F. Salah, and P. Varaiya, “Rate-constrained energy services in electricity,” IEEE Trans. on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2894–2907, 2018.
- R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, “Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions,” Journal of banking & finance, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1443–1471, 2002.
- R. T. Rockafellar, S. Uryasev et al., “Optimization of conditional value-at-risk,” Journal of risk, vol. 2, pp. 21–42, 2000.
- California ISO. [Online]. Available: http://www.caiso.com/market/Pages/ReportsBulletins/DailyRenewablesWatch.aspx