Top-Down Partitioning for Efficient List-Wise Ranking (2405.14589v1)

Abstract: LLMs have significantly impacted many facets of natural language processing and information retrieval. Unlike previous encoder-based approaches, the enlarged context window of these generative models allows for ranking multiple documents at once, commonly called list-wise ranking. However, there are still limits to the number of documents that can be ranked in a single inference of the model, leading to the broad adoption of a sliding window approach to identify the k most relevant items in a ranked list. We argue that the sliding window approach is not well-suited for list-wise re-ranking because it (1) cannot be parallelized in its current form, (2) leads to redundant computational steps repeatedly re-scoring the best set of documents as it works its way up the initial ranking, and (3) prioritizes the lowest-ranked documents for scoring rather than the highest-ranked documents by taking a bottom-up approach. Motivated by these shortcomings and an initial study that shows list-wise rankers are biased towards relevant documents at the start of their context window, we propose a novel algorithm that partitions a ranking to depth k and processes documents top-down. Unlike sliding window approaches, our algorithm is inherently parallelizable due to the use of a pivot element, which can be compared to documents down to an arbitrary depth concurrently. In doing so, we reduce the number of expected inference calls by around 33% when ranking at depth 100 while matching the performance of prior approaches across multiple strong re-rankers.

Top-Down Partitioning for Efficient List-Wise Ranking

Overview

This paper tackles the task of ranking multiple documents in NLP using LLMs through a novel algorithm that optimizes the efficiency and effectiveness of list-wise ranking systems. The authors highlight the limitations of the common sliding window approach and propose a new top-down partitioning algorithm that processes documents more efficiently by using a pivoting strategy.

Limitations of Sliding Window Approaches

The sliding window method, a widely adopted approach for list-wise ranking, has several key shortcomings:

1. Lack of Parallelization: This design leads to sequential dependencies, making it challenging to parallelize the computation.
2. Redundant Computational Steps: Documents are rescored multiple times as the window moves through the list, introducing inefficiencies.
3. Bottom-Up Prioritization: The sliding window starts from the bottom of the ranking, which tends to focus on lower-ranked documents first.

The consequence of these issues is that sliding windows can be computationally expensive and not well-suited for scenarios requiring high efficiency.

The Proposed Top-Down Partitioning Algorithm

The paper proposes addressing these shortcomings through a top-down partitioning algorithm which operates as follows:

• It partitions the ranking list to a depth k and processes documents from the top down rather than bottom up.
• A pivot element is selected from the top w documents, and this pivot is used as a reference to compare and score other documents concurrently.
• The algorithm effectively reduces the number of necessary inferences by about 33% when ranking at depth 100, matching the performance of previous methods but with greater computational efficiency.

Strong Numerical Results

The empirical evidence presented is promising:

• The number of inferences required by the top-down approach can be reduced significantly (up to 33%).
• Performance in terms of nDCG@10—a key metric for ranking quality—was maintained across multiple strong re-ranking models, such as RankZephyr and GPT-3.5.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

Practical Implications:

• This algorithm can transform applications requiring high precision datasets, such as information retrieval for search engines and recommendation systems.
• By reducing the computational cost, it makes list-wise ranking approaches more scalable, therefore feasible for real-time applications.

Theoretical Implications:

• The use of top-down partitioning and pivot elements introduces a new paradigm in how we can approach optimization problems in NLP.
• This method blends concepts from selection algorithms and dynamic pruning, suggesting further cross-pollination across AI disciplines could yield significant benefits.

Future Directions

The insights from this research pave the way for several future developments:

1. Enhanced Robustness: Future work could aim at making list-wise rankers more robust, especially in out-of-domain scenarios.
2. Training Data Annotation: Efficient algorithms like these can expedite the annotation of training data, a growing trend in state-of-the-art ranking models.
3. Dynamic Budgeting: Fine-tuning budgeting in top-down partitioning could yield even more granular control over efficiency and performance trade-offs.

Conclusion

The top-down partitioning algorithm presents a viable solution to the inefficiencies of sliding window approaches in list-wise ranking. With favorable empirical results, this method offers a promising direction for both practitioners and researchers aiming to optimize document ranking in NLP tasks. The balance of reduced computational expense and maintained performance makes this algorithm a valuable contribution to the field.