Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Data-driven Coordinated AC/DC Control Strategy for Frequency Safety (2405.12546v1)

Published 21 May 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: With high penetrations of renewable energy and power electronics converters, less predictable operating conditions and strong uncertainties in under-frequency events pose challenges for emergency frequency control (EFC). On the other hand, the fast adjustability of converter-based sources presents opportunities to reduce economic losses from traditional load shedding for EFC. By integrating DC power emergency support, a data-driven coordinated AC/DC control strategy for frequency safety - Coordinated Emergency Frequency Control (CEFC) - has been designed. CEFC coordinates both the initiation and control amount of emergency DC power support (EDCPS) and traditional load shedding. Based on real-time power system response data, CEFC ensures system frequency safety at a minimum control cost under non-envisioned operating conditions and large power deficits. A sufficient condition where data-driven modeling errors do not affect the precision of the control strategy for power system frequency is rigorously provided. Simulation results demonstrate CEFC's adaptability, prediction accuracy, and control effectiveness.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. Y. Liu, Y. Song, Z. Wang, and C. Shen, “Optimal emergency frequency control based on coordinated droop in multi-infeed hybrid ac-dc system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3305–3316, 2021.
  2. R. Li, S. Bozhko, and G. Asher, “Frequency control design for offshore wind farm grid with lcc-hvdc link connection,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1085–1092, 2008.
  3. G. Karady and J. Gu, “A hybrid method for generator tripping,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1102–1107, 2002.
  4. U. Rudez and R. Mihalic, “Monitoring the first frequency derivative to improve adaptive underfrequency load-shedding schemes,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 839–846, 2011.
  5. Y. Tofis, S. Timotheou, and E. Kyriakides, “Minimal load shedding using the swing equation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2466–2467, 2017.
  6. S. Wu, F. Liu, Z. Wang, J. Lin, and H. Geng, “Minimum energy demands of energy storages for fast frequency response: Formulation, solution, and implementation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 3615–3630, 2024.
  7. H. Golpîra, H. Bevrani, A. Román Messina, and B. Francois, “A data-driven under frequency load shedding scheme in power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1138–1150, 2023.
  8. Q. Wang, F. Li, Y. Tang, and Y. Xu, “Integrating model-driven and data-driven methods for power system frequency stability assessment and control,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 4557–4568, 2019.
  9. U. Rudez and R. Mihalic, “Wams-based underfrequency load shedding with short-term frequency prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1912–1920, 2016.
  10. B. O. Koopman, “Hamiltonian systems and transformation in hilbert space,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 315–318, 1931.
  11. M. Korda, Y. Susuki, and I. Mezić, “Power grid transient stabilization using koopman model predictive control,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 28, pp. 297–302, 2018, 10th IFAC Symposium on Control of Power and Energy Systems CPES 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896318334372
  12. S. L. Brunton, M. Budišić, E. Kaiser, and J. N. Kutz, “Modern koopman theory for dynamical systems,” SIAM Review, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 229–340, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1137/21M1401243
  13. E. Kaiser, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton, “Data-driven discovery of koopman eigenfunctions for control,” Machine Learning: Science and Technology, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 035023, jun 2021. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/abf0f5
  14. Q. Cao, C. Shen, and Y. Liu, “Data-driven emergency frequency control for multi-infeed hybrid ac-dc system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2023.
  15. T. Xu, G. Li, Z. Yu et al., “Design and application of emergency coordination control system for multi-infeed hvdc receiving-end system coping with frequency stability problem,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 41, no. 08, pp. 98–104, 2017.
  16. S. Chandak, P. Bhowmik, and P. K. Rout, “Load shedding strategy coordinated with storage device and d-statcom to enhance the microgrid stability,” Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2019.
  17. P. Santurino, L. Sigrist, A. Ortega, J. Renedo, and E. Lobato, “Optimal coordinated design of under-frequency load shedding and energy storage systems,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 211, p. 108423, 2022.
  18. Y. Liu, C. Shen, Z. Wang, and F. Liu, “Incentive mechanism design for emergency frequency control in multi-infeed hybrid ac-dc system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1867–1880, 2024.
  19. “Electromechanical transient model - csee benchmark,” https://github.com/lbl-hub/CSEE-Benchmark, accessed: 2024-01-15.
  20. Y. Liu and Y. Song, “Modeling and simulation of hybrid ac-dc system on a cloud computing based simulation platform - cloudpss,” in 2018 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), 2018, pp. 1–6.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com