Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Shallow Recurrent Decoder for Reduced Order Modeling of Plasma Dynamics (2405.11955v1)

Published 20 May 2024 in physics.plasm-ph, cs.LG, nlin.PS, and physics.comp-ph

Abstract: Reduced order models are becoming increasingly important for rendering complex and multiscale spatio-temporal dynamics computationally tractable. The computational efficiency of such surrogate models is especially important for design, exhaustive exploration and physical understanding. Plasma simulations, in particular those applied to the study of ${\bf E}\times {\bf B}$ plasma discharges and technologies, such as Hall thrusters, require substantial computational resources in order to resolve the multidimentional dynamics that span across wide spatial and temporal scales. Although high-fidelity computational tools are available to simulate such systems over limited conditions and in highly simplified geometries, simulations of full-size systems and/or extensive parametric studies over many geometric configurations and under different physical conditions are computationally intractable with conventional numerical tools. Thus, scientific studies and industrially oriented modeling of plasma systems, including the important ${\bf E}\times {\bf B}$ technologies, stand to significantly benefit from reduced order modeling algorithms. We develop a model reduction scheme based upon a {\em Shallow REcurrent Decoder} (SHRED) architecture. The scheme uses a neural network for encoding limited sensor measurements in time (sequence-to-sequence encoding) to full state-space reconstructions via a decoder network. Based upon the theory of separation of variables, the SHRED architecture is capable of (i) reconstructing full spatio-temporal fields with as little as three point sensors, even the fields that are not measured with sensor feeds but that are in dynamic coupling with the measured field, and (ii) forecasting the future state of the system using neural network roll-outs from the trained time encoding model.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (68)
  1. Three-dimensional kinetic simulations of non-equilibrium partially magnetized exb devices - anomalous transport & coherent structures. In APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts, volume 2023 of APS Meeting Abstracts, page GP11.020, jan 2023.
  2. 3d particle-in-cell study of the electron drift instability in a hall thruster using unstructured grids. Physics of Plasmas, 30(3):033503, 03 2023.
  3. Reduced-order particle-in-cell simulations of a high-power magnetically shielded hall thruster. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 32(6):065016, jun 2023.
  4. One-, two-, and three-dimensional modeling of the different phases of wire array z-pinch evolution. Physics of Plasmas, 8(5):2305–2314, 05 2001.
  5. A survey of projection-based model reduction methods for parametric dynamical systems. SIAM Rev., 57(4):483–531, 2015.
  6. Data-driven science and engineering: Machine learning, dynamical systems, and control. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  7. J. N. Kutz. Data-Driven Modeling & Scientific Computation: Methods for Complex Systems & Big Data. Oxford University Press, 2013.
  8. Data-driven sensor placement with shallow decoder networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.05330, 2022.
  9. Leveraging arbitrary mobile sensor trajectories with shallow recurrent decoder networks for full-state reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.11793, 2023.
  10. Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Data-Driven Modeling of Complex Systems. SIAM, 2016.
  11. Pydmd: A python package for robust dynamic mode decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07463, 2024.
  12. Variable projection methods for an optimized dynamic mode decomposition. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 17(1):380–416, 2018.
  13. Bagging, optimized dynamic mode decomposition for robust, stable forecasting with spatial and temporal uncertainty quantification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 380(2229):20210199, 2022.
  14. Dynamic mode decomposition for plasma diagnostics and validation. Review of Scientific Instruments, 89(5):053501, 2018.
  15. Characterizing magnetized plasmas with dynamic mode decomposition. Physics of Plasmas, 27:032108, 2020.
  16. Dynamic mode decomposition for data-driven analysis and reduced-order modeling of e×\times× b plasmas: I. extraction of spatiotemporally coherent patterns. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 57(6):065201, 2023.
  17. Dynamic mode decomposition for data-driven analysis and reduced-order modeling of e×\times× b plasmas: Ii. dynamics forecasting. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 57(6):065202, 2023.
  18. Extracting spatial–temporal coherent patterns in large-scale neural recordings using dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 258:1–15, 2016.
  19. Pysindy: A comprehensive python package for robust sparse system identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08481, 2021.
  20. Data-driven discovery and extrapolation of parameterized pattern-forming dynamics. Physical Review Research, 5(4):L042017, 2023.
  21. Physics-constrained, low-dimensional models for mhd: First-principles and data-driven approaches. Physical Review E, 104(015206), 2021.
  22. Time-dependent solps-iter simulations of the tokamak plasma boundary for model predictive control using sindy. Nuclear Fusion, 63(4):046015, 2023.
  23. Ensemble-sindy: Robust sparse model discovery in the low-data, high-noise limit, with active learning and control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10992, 2021.
  24. L Gao and J Nathan Kutz. Bayesian autoencoders for data-driven discovery of coordinates, governing equations and fundamental constants. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10575, 2022.
  25. Weak sindy for partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 443:110525, 2021.
  26. Machine-learning-enabled plasma modeling and prediction. In Proceedings of 2024 SciTech Forum conference, Orlando, Florida, 2024.
  27. Data-driven local operator finding for reduced-order modelling of plasma systems: I. concept and verifications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01523, 2024.
  28. Data-driven local operator finding for reduced-order modelling of plasma systems: Ii. application to parametric dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01532, 2024.
  29. A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00019, 2015.
  30. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997.
  31. A review of recurrent neural networks: Lstm cells and network architectures. Neural computation, 31(7):1235–1270, 2019.
  32. F. Takens. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 898:366–381, 1981.
  33. Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system. Nature Communications, 8(19):1–9, 2017.
  34. A data-driven Koopman model predictive control framework for nonlinear partial differential equations. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 2018.
  35. Discovering governing equations from partial measurements with deep delay autoencoders. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 479(2276):20230422, 2023.
  36. Ekf-sindy: Empowering the extended kalman filter with sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07536, 2024.
  37. Identification of nonlinear dynamical systems with time delay. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 10(1):13–24, 2022.
  38. Shallow neural networks for fluid flow reconstruction with limited sensors. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 476(2238):20200097, 2020.
  39. Physics of exb discharges relevant to plasma propulsion and similar technologies. Physics of Plasmas, 27(12):120601, 12 2020.
  40. Physics and instabilities of low-temperature exb plasmas for spacecraft propulsion and other applications. Physics of Plasmas, 30(5):050901, 05 2023.
  41. Theory for the anomalous electron transport in hall effect thrusters. i. insights from particle-in-cell simulations. Phys. Plasmas, 23:053502, 2016.
  42. Hall2de simulations with a first-principles electron transport model based on the electron cyclotron drift instability. In 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2016.
  43. A model for turbulence-induced electron transport in hall thrusters. In 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 2017.
  44. Benjamin Jorns. Predictive, data-driven model for the anomalous electron collision frequency in a hall effect thruster. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 27:104007, 2018.
  45. Evaluation of algebraic models of anomalous transport in a multi-fluid hall thruster code. J. Appl. Phys., 134:153301, 2023.
  46. Jean-Pierre Boeuf. Tutorial: Physics and modeling of hall thrusters. Journal of Applied Physics, 121:011101, 2017.
  47. Latest progress in hall thrusters plasma modelling. Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics, 3(1), 2019.
  48. Edgar Y. Choueiri. Plasma oscillations in hall thrusters. Phys. Plasmas, 8:1411–1426, 2001.
  49. Self-organization, structures, and anomalous transport in turbulent partially magnetized plasmas with crossed electric and magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122:185001, 2019.
  50. 2d radial-azimuthal particle-in-cell benchmark for ExB discharges. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol., 30:075002, 2021.
  51. Parametric investigation of azimuthal instabilities and electron transport in a radial-azimuthal exb plasma configuration. Journal of Applied Physics, 133(12), 2023.
  52. Influence of the magnetic field curvature on the radial-azimuthal dynamics of a hall thruster plasma discharge with different propellants. J. Appl. Phys., 134:233303, 2023.
  53. Effects of the applied fields’ strength on the plasma behavior and processes in ExB plasma discharges of various propellants: I. electric field. Phys. Plasmas, 31:032120, 2024.
  54. Effects of the applied fields’ strength on the plasma behavior and processes in ExB plasma discharges of various propellants: Ii. magnetic field. Phys. Plasmas, 31:032121, 2024.
  55. Verification of the generalized reduced-order particle-in-cell scheme in a radial-azimuthal exb plasma configuration. AIP Advances, 13:025315, 2023.
  56. Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Review, 59:65–98, 2017.
  57. Evolution of the electron cyclotron drift instability in two dimensions. Phys. Plasmas, 25:082308, 2018.
  58. High-frequency electron drift instability in the cross-field configuration of hall thrusters. Phys. Plasmas, 13:102111, 2006.
  59. Hall thruster plasma fluctuations identified as the exb electron drift instability: Modeling and fitting on experimental data. Phys. Plasmas, 20:082107, 2013.
  60. Three-dimensional structure of electron density fluctuations in the hall thruster plasma: the exb mode. Phys. Plasmas, 17:112110, 2010.
  61. Conditions of appearance and dynamics of the modified two-stream instability in exb discharges. Phys. Plasmas, 28:043504, 2021.
  62. Nonlinear structures and anomalous transport in partially magnetized exb plasmas. Phys. Plasmas, 25:011608, 2018.
  63. Gerald B Folland. Introduction to partial differential equations. Princeton university press, 2020.
  64. Numerical linear algebra, volume 50. Siam, 1997.
  65. An algorithm for the principal component analysis of large data sets. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 33:2580–2594, 2011.
  66. A randomized algorithm for a tensor-based generalization of the singular value decomposition. Linear algebra and its applications, 420(2-3):553–571, 2007.
  67. Randomized cp tensor decomposition. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 1(2):025012, 2020.
  68. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, January 2017. arXiv:1412.6980 [cs].
Citations (5)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com