Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Broadening Privacy and Surveillance: Eliciting Interconnected Values with a Scenarios Workbook on Smart Home Cameras (2405.10904v1)

Published 17 May 2024 in cs.HC and cs.CY

Abstract: We use a design workbook of speculative scenarios as a values elicitation activity with 14 participants. The workbook depicts use case scenarios with smart home camera technologies that involve surveillance and uneven power relations. The scenarios were initially designed by the researchers to explore scenarios of privacy and surveillance within three social relationships involving "primary" and "non-primary" users: Parents-Children, Landlords-Tenants, and Residents-Domestic Workers. When the scenarios were utilized as part of a values elicitation activity with participants, we found that they reflected on a broader set of interconnected social values beyond privacy and surveillance, including autonomy and agency, physical safety, property rights, trust and accountability, and fairness. The paper suggests that future research about ethical issues in smart homes should conceptualize privacy as interconnected with a broader set of social values (which can align or be in tension with privacy), and reflects on considerations for doing research with non-primary users.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (126)
  1. Tangible Privacy: Towards User-Centric Sensor Designs for Bystander Privacy. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 116 (oct 2020), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415187
  2. The Heterogeneous Home. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Seoul, Korea) (UbiComp ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409635.1409666
  3. Expanding Participation to Design with More-Than-Human Concerns. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1 (Manizales, Colombia) (PDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385016
  4. Irwin Altman. 1975. The environment and social behavior: privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Monterey, California.
  5. Mark Andrejevic. 2005. The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance and Society 2, 4 (2005), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i4.3359
  6. Overlooking Context : How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445672
  7. Judgment Call the Game: Using value sensitive design and design fiction to surface ethical concerns related to technology. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference - DIS ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323697
  8. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
  9. Brian Barrett. 2015. Fuhu’s Kid-Centric Smart Home Is a Helicopter Parent’s Dream. Wired (8 7 2015). https://www.wired.com/2015/07/fuhu-smart-home/
  10. Eric P.S. Baumer. 2015. Usees. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3295–3298. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702147
  11. What Would You Do? Design Fiction and Ethics. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/3148330.3149405
  12. Balancing Power Dynamics in Smart Homes: Nannies’ Perspectives on How Cameras Reflect and Affect Relationships. In Eighteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2022) (2022). USENIX Association, 687—706. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2022/presentation/bernd
  13. Bystanders’ privacy: The perspectives of nannies on smart home surveillance. In FOCI 2020 - 10th USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (2020).
  14. Moving Design Research: GIFs as Research Tools. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1927–1940. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462144
  15. Dieter Bohn. 2020. The Ring drone is just the latest Amazon privacy puzzle box. The Verge (2020). https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/25/21455197/amazon-ring-drone-home-security-surveillance-sidewalk-halo-privacy [Online; accessed 2021-09-09].
  16. Power to the People: Dynamic Energy Management through Communal Cooperation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318048
  17. Pam Briggs and Lisa Thomas. 2015. An Inclusive, Value Sensitive Design Perspective on Future Identity Technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22, 5 (10 8 2015), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2778972
  18. Simone Browne. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press, Durham.
  19. Joern Henning Buehring and Jeanne Liedtka. 2018. Embracing systematic futures thinking at the intersection of Strategic Planning, Foresight and Design. Journal of Innovation Management 6, 3 (23 11 2018), 134. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_006.003_0006
  20. The Privacy-Utility Tradeoff for Remotely Teleoperated Robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2015-03-02). ACM, Portland Oregon USA, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696484
  21. John M Carroll (Ed.). 1995. Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
  22. “It Did Not Give Me an Option to Decline”: A Longitudinal Analysis of the User Experience of Security and Privacy in Smart Home Products. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 555, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445691
  23. What Happens After Death? Using a Design Workbook to Understand User Expectations for Preparing their Data. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021-05-06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445359
  24. Wearable Microphone Jamming. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376304
  25. Peekaboo Cam: Designing an observational camera for home ecologies concerning privacy. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2019-06-18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323699
  26. Investigating receptiveness to sensing and inference in the home using sensor proxies. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp ’12 (2012). ACM Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 61. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370226
  27. Danielle Keats Citron and Daniel J. Solove. 2022. Privacy Harms. Boston University Law Review 102, 3 (2022), 793–864. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3782222
  28. “I would have to evaluate their objections”: Privacy tensions between smart home device owners and incidental users. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2021, 4 (1 10 2021), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2021-0060
  29. Let’s SOUP up XR: Collected thoughts from an IEEE VR workshop on privacy in mixed reality. In VR4Sec: Security for VR and VR for Security, SOUPS 2021 Workshop.
  30. Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2010. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41, 1 (Dec. 2010), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
  31. Sensorstation: Exploring Simple Sensor Data in the Context of a Shared Apartment. In Proceedings of the 2019 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322309
  32. Designing Speculative Civics. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4979–4990. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858505
  33. Making public things: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014-04-26). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2397–2406. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557359
  34. It’s not privacy, and it’s not fair. Stanford Law Review Online 66 (2013), 35–40.
  35. Nils Ehrenberg and Turkka Keinonen. 2021. The Technology Is Enemy for Me at the Moment: How Smart Home Technologies Assert Control Beyond Intent. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021-05-06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445058
  36. On Speculative Enactments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017-05-02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5386–5399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025503
  37. Reinventing the Wheel: The Future Ripples Method for Activating Anticipatory Capacities in Innovation Teams. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2022-06-13). ACM, Virtual Event Australia, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3534570
  38. Martyn Evans. 2003. Trend Forecasting for Design Futures. In European Academy of Design Conference (2003).
  39. A Design Space for Privacy Choices: Towards Meaningful Privacy Control in the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445148
  40. Casey Fiesler. 2019. Ethical Considerations for Research Involving (Speculative) Public Data. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, GROUP (5 12 2019), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3370271
  41. Casey Fiesler. 2021. Ethical Speculation in the Computing Classroom. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT) (2021-05-23). IEEE, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT51740.2021.9620641
  42. Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2014. Groundwork for Values in Games. In Values at Play in Digital Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  43. Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity. 2016. Cybersecurity futures 2020. Technical Report. 128 pages. https://cltc.berkeley.edu/2016/04/28/cybersecurity-futures-2020/
  44. ”A Stalker’s Paradise”: How Intimate Partner Abusers Exploit Technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18 (2018). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174241
  45. A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 11, 2 (2017), 63–125. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000015
  46. Radhika Garg and Hua Cui. 2022. Social Contexts, Agency, and Conflicts: Exploring Critical Aspects of Design for Future Smart Home Technologies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 29, 2 (30 4 2022), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485058
  47. Bill Gaver and Heather Martin. 2000. Alternatives: Exploring Information Appliances through Conceptual Design Proposals. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands) (CHI ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332433
  48. William Gaver. 2011. Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11) (2011). 1551–1560. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979169
  49. Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901905
  50. Christina Harrington and Tawanna R. Dillahunt. 2021. Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021-05-06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445723
  51. Technology probes. In Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI ’03) (2003). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642616
  52. Alan Jacobs. 2016. Attending to Technology - Theses for Disputation. The New Atlantis (2016). https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/attending-to-technology-theses-for-disputation
  53. Values as Hypotheses: Design, Inquiry, and the Service of Values. Design Issues 31, 4 (10 2015), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00354
  54. Tom Jenkins. 2017. Living Apart, Together: Cohousing as a Site for ICT Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (2017-06-10). ACM, Edinburgh United Kingdom, 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064751
  55. Proceed with Care: Reimagining Home IoT Through a Care Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 166, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445602
  56. A Scenario-Based Methodology for Exploring Risks: Children and Programmable IoT. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2019-06-18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322315
  57. “We Just Use What They Give Us”: Understanding Passenger User Perspectives in Smart Homes. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 41, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445598
  58. Expanding Modes of Reflection in Design Futuring. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376526
  59. Spaces and Traces: Implications of Smart Technology in Public Housing. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300669
  60. Guess the Data: Data Work to Understand How People Make Sense of and Use Simple Sensor Data from Homes. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376273
  61. Alexa, Are You Listening?: Privacy Perceptions, Concerns and Privacy-seeking Behaviors with Smart Speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (11 2018), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274371
  62. Values as lived experience: Evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI 09 (2009). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1141. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518875
  63. Hosub Lee and Alfred Kobsa. 2020. Confident Privacy Decision-Making in IoT Environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 1 (23 1 2020), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364223
  64. Design Research and Object-Oriented Ontology. Open Philosophy 3, 1 (Jan. 2020), 11–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0002
  65. Researching AI Legibility through Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376792
  66. Design for Collaborative Survival: An Inquiry into Human-Fungi Relationships. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173614
  67. New Metaphors: A workshop method for generating ideas and reframing problems in design and beyond. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (2019-06-13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3326570
  68. “You just can’t know about everything”: Privacy Perceptions of Smart Home Visitors. In 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (2020-11-22). ACM, Essen Germany, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428361.3428464
  69. Roles Matter! Understanding Differences in the Privacy Mental Models of Smart Home Visitors and Residents. In 20th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (2021-05-12). ACM, Leuven Belgium, 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490632.3490664
  70. Roger Martin. 2009. The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Edge. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  71. Ramia Mazé et al. 2019. Politics of designing visions of the future. Journal of Futures Studies 23, 3 (2019), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0003
  72. Privacy and Power: Acknowledging the Importance of Privacy Research and Design for Vulnerable Populations. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-25). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375174
  73. Nora McDonald and Andrea Forte. 2020. The Politics of Privacy Theories: Moving from Norms to Vulnerabilities. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376167
  74. Nick Merrill. 2020. Security Fictions: Bridging Speculative Design and Computer Security. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2020-07-03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1727–1735. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395451
  75. Deirdre K. Mulligan and Jennifer King. 2011. Bridging the gap between privacy and design. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (2011), 989–1034.
  76. Privacy is an essentially contested concept: a multi-dimensional analytic for mapping privacy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, 2083 (28 12 2016), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0118
  77. This Thing Called Fairness: Disciplinary confusion realizing a value in technology. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (7 11 2019), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359221
  78. Deirdre K. Mulligan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2020. The Concept of Handoff as a Model for Ethical Analysis and Design. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, Markus D. Dubber, Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das (Eds.). Oxford University Press, 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.15
  79. Privacy Expectations and Preferences in an IoT World. In Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2017) (2017). 399–412.
  80. PDFi: Participatory Design Fiction with Vulnerable Users. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240272
  81. Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS ’08 (2008). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394446
  82. Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
  83. HawkEye - Deploying a Design Fiction Probe. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300652
  84. Diversifying the Domestic: A Design Inquiry into Collective and Mobile Living. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference - DIS ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1377–1390. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323687
  85. Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 - DIS ’18 (2018). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196810
  86. James Pierce. 2019a. Lamps, Curtains, Robots: 3 scenarios for the future of the smart home. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition - C&C ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 423–424. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3329181
  87. James Pierce. 2019b. Smart Home Security Cameras and Shifting Lines of Creepiness: A Design-Led Inquiry. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019-05-02). ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300275
  88. James Pierce. 2021. Eccentric Sensing Devices: Using Conceptual Design Notes to Understand Design Opportunities, Limitations, and Concerns Connected to Digital Sensing. In Creativity and Cognition (Virtual Event, Italy) (C&C ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 37, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3466775
  89. James Pierce and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. Addressing Network Anxieties with Alternative Design Metaphors. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174123
  90. Differential Vulnerabilities and a Diversity of Tactics: What Toolkits Teach Us about Cybersecurity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (1 11 2018), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274408
  91. An Interface without A User: An Exploratory Design Study of Online Privacy Policies and Digital Legalese. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1345–1358. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196818
  92. Addressing Adjacent Actor Privacy: Designing for Bystanders, Co-Users, and Surveilled Subjects of Smart Home Cameras. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2022-06-13). ACM, Virtual Event Australia, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3535195
  93. Sensor Illumination: Exploring Design Qualities and Ethical Implications of Smart Cameras and Image/Video Analytics. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20) (2020). 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376347
  94. Our Friends Electric: Reflections on Advocacy and Design Research for the Voice Enabled Internet. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300344
  95. Johnny Saldaña. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage, Los Angeles.
  96. Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107–171. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000073
  97. Role-Playing Computer Ethics: Designing and Evaluating the Privacy by Design (PbD) Simulation. Science and Engineering Ethics (1 7 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00250-0
  98. Daniel J. Solove. 2002. Conceptualizing privacy. California Law Review 90 (2002), 1087–1155. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929609.1929610
  99. Daniel J. Solove. 2003. A Taxonomy of Privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154, 3 (2003), 477–560.
  100. Daniel J Solove. 2008. Privacy: A Concept in Disarray. In Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  101. Luke Stark and Karen Levy. 2018. The surveillant consumer. Media, Culture & Society 40, 8 (25 11 2018), 1202–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718781985
  102. Protection, Productivity and Pleasure in the Smart Home: Emerging Expectations and Gendered Insights from Australian Early Adopters. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019-05-02). ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300875
  103. Shea Swauger. 2020. Software that monitors students during tests perpetuates inequality and violates their privacy. MIT Technology Review (7 8 2020). https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/07/1006132/software-algorithms-proctoring-online-tests-ai-ethics/
  104. Smart Home Beyond the Home: A Case for Community-Based Access Control. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376255
  105. Critical-Playful Speculations with Cameras in the Home. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2022-04-29). ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502109
  106. Monitoring Pets, Deterring Intruders, and Casually Spying on Neighbors: Everyday Uses of Smart Home Cameras. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2022-04-29). ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517617
  107. “It would probably turn into a social faux-pas”: Users’ and Bystanders’ Preferences of Privacy Awareness Mechanisms in Smart Homes. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2022-04-29). ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502137
  108. Who Gets to Future? Race, Representation, and Design Methods in Africatown. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19 (2019). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300791
  109. Intruders versus intrusiveness: Teens’ and Parents’ Perspectives on Home-Entryway Surveillance. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2014-09-13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632107
  110. Eero Vaara and Richard Whittington. 2012. Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously. Academy of Management Annals 6, 1 (6 2012), 285–336. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.672039
  111. Kees van der Heijden. 2005. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  112. Scenarios and the art of worldmaking. Futures 74 (11 2015), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.009
  113. Pierre Wack. 1985. Scenarios: uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Business Review 63, 5 (1985), 73–89.
  114. Ron Wakkary. 2021. Things We Could Design: For More Than Human-Centered Worlds. MIT Press.
  115. Steven Weber. 1996. Counterfactuals, past and future. In Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives, Phlip E. Tetlock and Aaron Belkin (Eds.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
  116. Beyond Checklist Approaches to Ethics in Design. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2020 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2020-10-17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418590
  117. Richmond Y. Wong and Vera Khovanskaya. 2018. Speculative Design in HCI: From Corporate Imaginations to Critical Orientations. In New Directions in 3rd Wave HCI, Michael Filimowicz (Ed.). Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10
  118. Infrastructural Speculations: Tactics for Designing and Interrogating Lifeworlds. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020-04-21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376515
  119. Richmond Y. Wong and Deirdre K. Mulligan. 2019. Bringing Design to the Privacy Table: Broadening ”Design” in ”Privacy by Design” Through the Lens of HCI. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2019) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300492
  120. Eliciting Values Reflections by Engaging Privacy Futures Using Design Workbooks. Proceedings of the ACM on Human Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3134746
  121. Richmond Y. Wong and Tonya Nguyen. 2021. Timelines: A World-Building Activity for Values Advocacy. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021-05-06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445447
  122. Do Streamers Care about Bystanders’ Privacy? An Examination of Live Streamers’ Considerations and Strategies for Bystanders’ Privacy Management. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CSCW1, Article 127 (apr 2023), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579603
  123. Susan Wyche. 2021. The Benefits of Using Design Workbooks with Speculative Design Proposals in Information Communication Technology for Development (ICTD). In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (2021-06-28). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1861–1874. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462140
  124. Privacy Perceptions and Designs of Bystanders in Smart Homes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (7 11 2019), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359161
  125. End User Security and Privacy Concerns with Smart Homes. In Thirteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2017) (2017). 65–80. https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2017/technical-sessions/presentation/zeng
  126. Eric Zeng and Franziska Roesner. 2019. Understanding and Improving Security and Privacy in Multi-User Smart Homes: A Design Exploration and In-Home User Study. In 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19) (2019). USENIX Association, 159—176. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity19/presentation/zeng
Citations (8)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets