Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Biasing & Debiasing based Approach Towards Fair Knowledge Transfer for Equitable Skin Analysis (2405.10256v1)

Published 16 May 2024 in cs.CV

Abstract: Deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have demonstrated exceptional performance in diagnosing skin diseases, often outperforming dermatologists. However, they have also unveiled biases linked to specific demographic traits, notably concerning diverse skin tones or gender, prompting concerns regarding fairness and limiting their widespread deployment. Researchers are actively working to ensure fairness in AI-based solutions, but existing methods incur an accuracy loss when striving for fairness. To solve this issue, we propose a `two-biased teachers' (i.e., biased on different sensitive attributes) based approach to transfer fair knowledge into the student network. Our approach mitigates biases present in the student network without harming its predictive accuracy. In fact, in most cases, our approach improves the accuracy of the baseline model. To achieve this goal, we developed a weighted loss function comprising biasing and debiasing loss terms. We surpassed available state-of-the-art approaches to attain fairness and also improved the accuracy at the same time. The proposed approach has been evaluated and validated on two dermatology datasets using standard accuracy and fairness evaluation measures. We will make source code publicly available to foster reproducibility and future research.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (35)
  1. Representative image feature extraction via contrastive learning pretraining for chest x-ray report generation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01604 (2022).
  2. E. Goceri, Classification of skin cancer using adjustable and fully convolutional capsule layers, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 85 (2023) 104949.
  3. Fixmatch-ls: Semi-supervised skin lesion classification with label smoothing, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 84 (2023) 104709.
  4. Fairness via representation neutralization, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021) 12091–12103.
  5. Evaluating subgroup disparity using epistemic uncertainty in mammography, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02716 (2021).
  6. Bias correction of intensity inhomogeneous images hybridized with superpixel segmentation, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 71 (2022) 103207.
  7. Hybrid cnn-transformer model for medical image segmentation with pyramid convolution and multi-layer perceptron, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 86 (2023) 105331.
  8. Investigating bias and fairness in facial expression recognition, in: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020 Workshops: Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part VI 16, Springer, 2020, pp. 506–523.
  9. Feature robustness and sex differences in medical imaging: A case study in mri-based alzheimer’s disease detection, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, 2022, pp. 88–98.
  10. Effect of selection bias on automatic colonoscopy polyp detection, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 85 (2023) 104915.
  11. Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (2020) 12592–12594.
  12. Evaluating deep neural networks trained on clinical images in dermatology with the fitzpatrick 17k dataset, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 1820–1828.
  13. Fairness of classifiers across skin tones in dermatology, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, 2020, pp. 320–329.
  14. Learning not to learn: Training deep neural networks with biased data, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 9012–9020.
  15. Balanced datasets are not enough: Estimating and mitigating gender bias in deep image representations, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019, pp. 5310–5319.
  16. Y. Elazar, Y. Goldberg, Adversarial removal of demographic attributes from text data, in: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2018. URL: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:52056513.
  17. Turning a blind eye: Explicit removal of biases and variation from deep neural network embeddings, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops, 2018, pp. 0–0.
  18. Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning, in: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 2018, pp. 335–340.
  19. Towards fairness in visual recognition: Effective strategies for bias mitigation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 8919–8928.
  20. Gender bias in neural natural language processing, Logic, Language, and Security: Essays Dedicated to Andre Scedrov on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday (2020) 189–202.
  21. Bias remediation in driver drowsiness detection systems using generative adversarial networks, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 55592–55601.
  22. Fair feature distillation for visual recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 12115–12124.
  23. Discovering fair representations in the data domain, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 8227–8236.
  24. Fairness in deep learning: A computational perspective, IEEE Intelligent Systems 36 (2020) 25–34.
  25. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning, Advances in neural information processing systems 29 (2016).
  26. Men also like shopping: Reducing gender bias amplification using corpus-level constraints, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.09457 (2017).
  27. Finetuning text-to-image diffusion models for fairness, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07604 (2023).
  28. Bias mimicking: A simple sampling approach for bias mitigation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 20311–20320.
  29. Distill and de-bias: Mitigating bias in face verification using knowledge distillation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09786 (2021).
  30. Revisiting adversarial robustness distillation from the perspective of robust fairness, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024).
  31. Reliant: Fair knowledge distillation for graph neural networks, in: Proceedings of the 2023 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), SIAM, 2023, pp. 154–162.
  32. Dual-teacher de-biasing distillation framework for multi-domain fake news detection, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.01006 (2023).
  33. Fairadabn: Mitigating unfairness with adaptive batch normalization and its application to dermatological disease classification, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2023).
  34. Fairprune: Achieving fairness through pruning for dermatological disease diagnosis, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, 2022, pp. 743–753.
  35. (2015) Distilling the knowledge in a neural network, arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531 (2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.02531.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com