Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
157 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
43 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Dynamical systems and complex networks: A Koopman operator perspective (2405.08940v2)

Published 14 May 2024 in math.DS and stat.ML

Abstract: The Koopman operator has entered and transformed many research areas over the last years. Although the underlying concept$\unicode{x2013}$representing highly nonlinear dynamical systems by infinite-dimensional linear operators$\unicode{x2013}$has been known for a long time, the availability of large data sets and efficient machine learning algorithms for estimating the Koopman operator from data make this framework extremely powerful and popular. Koopman operator theory allows us to gain insights into the characteristic global properties of a system without requiring detailed mathematical models. We will show how these methods can also be used to analyze complex networks and highlight relationships between Koopman operators and graph Laplacians.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (77)
  1. C. Schütte. Conformational dynamics: Modelling, theory, algorithm, and application to biomolecules, 1999. Habilitation Thesis.
  2. Constructing the full ensemble of folding pathways from short off-equilibrium simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106:19011–19016, 2009.
  3. Markov models of molecular kinetics: Generation and validation. Journal of Chemical Physics, 134:174105, 2011.
  4. C. Schütte and M. Sarich. Metastability and Markov State Models in Molecular Dynamics: Modeling, Analysis, Algorithmic Approaches. Number 24 in Courant Lecture Notes. American Mathematical Society, 2013.
  5. Improvements in Markov State Model construction reveal many non-native interactions in the folding of NTL9. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 9:2000–2009, 2013.
  6. A kernel-based approach to molecular conformation analysis. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 149:244109, 2018. doi:10.1063/1.5063533.
  7. P. J. Schmid. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 656:5–28, 2010. doi:10.1017/S0022112010001217.
  8. I. Mezić. Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions. Nonlinear Dynamics, 41(1):309–325, 2005. doi:10.1007/s11071-005-2824-x.
  9. Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 641:115–127, 2009. doi:10.1017/S0022112009992059.
  10. Applied Koopmanism. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 22(4), 2012. doi:10.1063/1.4772195.
  11. Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition. Physics of Fluids, 26(2), 2014.
  12. Tensor-based dynamic mode decomposition. Nonlinearity, 31(7), 2018. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aabc8f.
  13. Three-dimensional characterization and tracking of an Agulhas ring. Ocean Modelling, 52-53:69–75, 2012.
  14. How well-connected is the surface of the global ocean? Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 24(3), 2014.
  15. Spatiotemporal feature extraction with data-driven Koopman operators. volume 44 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 103–115, 2015.
  16. Z. Zhao and D. Giannakis. Analog forecasting with dynamics-adapted kernels. Nonlinearity, 29(9):2888, 2016. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/29/9/2888.
  17. Kernel methods for detecting coherent structures in dynamical data. Chaos, 2019. doi:10.1063/1.5100267.
  18. Estimation of Koopman transfer operators for the equatorial pacific SST. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 78(4):1227–1244, 2021. doi:10.1175/JAS-D-20-0136.1.
  19. G. A. Pavliotis. Stochastic Processes and Applications: Diffusion Processes, the Fokker–Planck and Langevin Equations, volume 60 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, 2014.
  20. Kernel-based approximation of the Koopman generator and Schrödinger operator. Entropy, 2020.
  21. Bilinear dynamic mode decomposition for quantum control. New Journal of Physics, 23(3):033035, 2021. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abe972.
  22. Koopman analysis of quantum systems. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 55(31):314002, 2022. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac7d22.
  23. Embedding classical dynamics in a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A, 105:052404, 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.052404.
  24. Koopman von Neumann mechanics and the Koopman representation: A perspective on solving nonlinear dynamical systems with quantum computers, 2022. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2202.02188.
  25. Exploring invariant sets and invariant measures. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 7(2):221–228, 1997.
  26. M. Dellnitz and O. Junge. On the approximation of complicated dynamical behavior. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 36(2):491–515, 1999.
  27. G. Froyland and M. Dellnitz. Detecting and locating near-optimal almost invariant sets and cycles. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 24(6):1839–1863, 2003.
  28. A set-oriented numerical approach for dynamical systems with parameter uncertainty. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 16(1):120–138, 2017. doi:10.1137/16M1072735.
  29. An operator methodology for the global dynamic analysis of stochastic nonlinear systems. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 13(3):100419, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.taml.2022.100419.
  30. A. Mauroy and J. Goncalves. Linear identification of nonlinear systems: A lifting technique based on the Koopman operator. In 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 6500–6505, 2016. doi:10.1109/CDC.2016.7799269.
  31. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(15):3932–3937, 2016.
  32. Data-driven approximation of the Koopman generator: Model reduction, system identification, and control. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 406:132416, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2020.132416.
  33. Data-driven discovery of Koopman eigenfunctions for control. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2(3):035023, 2021. doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abf0f5.
  34. C. Zhang and E. Zuazua. A quantitative analysis of Koopman operator methods for system identification and predictions. Comptes Rendus. Mécanique, 2023. doi:10.5802/crmeca.138.
  35. M. Korda and I. Mezić. Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive control. Automatica, 93:149–160, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03.046.
  36. S. Peitz and S. Klus. Koopman operator-based model reduction for switched-system control of PDEs. Automatica, 106:184–191, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.05.016.
  37. Data-driven model predictive control using interpolated Koopman generators. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 19(3):2162–2193, 2020. doi:10.1137/20M1325678.
  38. The Koopman Operator in Systems and Control: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences. Springer International Publishing, 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35713-9.
  39. Koopman operator dynamical models: Learning, analysis and control. Annual Reviews in Control, 52:197–212, 2021. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.09.002.
  40. Robust tube-based model predictive control with Koopman operators. Automatica, 137:110114, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2021.110114.
  41. N. Djurdjevac. Methods for analyzing complex networks using random walker approaches. PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, 2012.
  42. Data-driven partitioning of power networks via Koopman mode analysis. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31(4):2799–2808, 2016. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2464779.
  43. Spectral complexity of directed graphs and application to structural decomposition. Complexity, 2019:9610826, 2019. doi:10.1155/2019/9610826.
  44. S. Sinha. Data-driven influence based clustering of dynamical systems. In 2022 European Control Conference (ECC), pages 1043–1048, 2022. doi:10.23919/ECC55457.2022.9838545.
  45. S. Klus and N. Djurdjevac Conrad. Koopman-based spectral clustering of directed and time-evolving graphs. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 33(1), 2022. doi:10.1007/s00332-022-09863-0.
  46. S. Klus and M. Trower. Transfer operators on graphs: Spectral clustering and beyond. Journal of Physics: Complexity, 5(1):015014, 2024. doi:10.1088/2632-072X/ad28fe.
  47. How fast-folding proteins fold. Science, 334(6055):517–520, 2011. doi:10.1126/science.1208351.
  48. Everything you wanted to know about Markov state models but were afraid to ask. Methods, 52(1):99–105, 2010.
  49. Overcoming the timescale barrier in molecular dynamics: Transfer operators, variational principles and machine learning. Acta Numerica, 32:517–673, 2023. doi:10.1017/S0962492923000016.
  50. Distinct metastable atmospheric regimes despite nearly Gaussian statistics: a paradigm model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103:8309–8314, 2006. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602641103.
  51. Stochastic basins of attraction for metastable states. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 26(7):073117, 2016. doi:10.1063/1.4959146.
  52. Statistical analysis of tipping pathways in agent-based models. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 230(16):3249–3271, 2021. doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00191-0.
  53. Mathematical modeling of spatio-temporal population dynamics and application to epidemic spreading. Mathematical Biosciences, 336:108619, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2021.108619.
  54. Data-driven model reduction of agent-based systems using the Koopman generator. PLOS ONE, 16(5):1–23, 2021. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250970.
  55. Insights into drivers of mobility and cultural dynamics of african hunter–gatherers over the past 120 000 years. Royal Society Open Science, 10(11):230495, 2023. doi:10.1098/rsos.230495.
  56. U. von Luxburg. A tutorial on spectral clustering. Statistics and Computing, 17(4):395–416, 2007. doi:10.1007/s11222-007-9033-z.
  57. M. Meila and J. Shi. Learning segmentation by random walks. In T. Leen, T. Dietterich, and V. Tresp, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 13, 2001.
  58. On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 14, 04 2002.
  59. D. Verma and M. Meila. A comparison of spectral clustering algorithms. University of Washington Technical Report UWCSE030501, pages 1–18, 2003.
  60. R. Lambiotte and M. T. Schaub. Modularity and Dynamics on Complex Networks. Elements in Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks. Cambridge University Press, 2022.
  61. Transport in time-dependent dynamical systems: Finite-time coherent sets. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 20(4):043116, 2010. doi:10.1063/1.3502450.
  62. R. Banisch and P. Koltai. Understanding the geometry of transport: Diffusion maps for Lagrangian trajectory data unravel coherent sets. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 27(3):035804, 2017. doi:10.1063/1.4971788.
  63. Optimal data-driven estimation of generalized Markov state models for non-equilibrium dynamics. Computation, 6(1), 2018. doi:10.3390/computation6010022.
  64. Rates of convergence for everywhere-positive Markov chains. Statistics & probability letters, 22(4):333–338, 1995.
  65. On the numerical approximation of the Perron–Frobenius and Koopman operator. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 3(1):51–79, 2016. doi:10.3934/jcd.2016003.
  66. A. Lasota and M. C. Mackey. Chaos, fractals, and noise: Stochastic aspects of dynamics, volume 97 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, New York, 2nd edition, 1994.
  67. G. Froyland. An analytic framework for identifying finite-time coherent sets in time-dependent dynamical systems. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 250:1–19, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2013.01.013.
  68. A. Pazy. Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations. Springer, 1983.
  69. Optimal non-reversible linear drift for the convergence to equilibrium of a diffusion. Journal of Statistical Physics, 152(2):237–274, 2013. doi:10.1007/s10955-013-0769-x.
  70. Mathematical Theory of Nonequilibrium Steady States: On the Frontier of Probability and Dynamical Systems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003.
  71. Broken detailed balance and entropy production in directed networks. 2024. arXiv:2402.19157.
  72. Modularity of directed networks: Cycle decomposition approach. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2(1):1–24, 2015.
  73. Finding dominant structures of nonreversible Markov processes. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 14(4):1319–1340, 2016.
  74. A data-driven approximation of the Koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25(6):1307–1346, 2015. doi:10.1007/s00332-015-9258-5.
  75. S. M. Ulam. A Collection of Mathematical Problems. Interscience Publisher NY, 1960.
  76. Sparse eigenbasis approximation: Multiple feature extraction across spatiotemporal scales with application to coherent set identification. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 77:81–107, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.04.012.
  77. Diffusion dynamics on multiplex networks. Physical Review Letters, 110:028701, 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.028701.
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates how applying Koopman operator theory simplifies nonlinear dynamics into linear forms for enhanced network prediction.
  • It details the role of transfer operators and infinitesimal generators in analyzing evolving graphs and uncovering hidden substructures.
  • The methodology supports applications from molecular dynamics to cybersecurity through effective data-driven predictions.

Unpacking Koopman Operators and Their Uses in Complex Networks

What’s the Big Idea?

Koopman operator theory might sound like something out of an advanced math class, but it’s actually a super-handy tool for anyone dealing with dynamical systems and networks. At its core, the Koopman operator transforms a nonlinear problem into a linear one. Imagine trying to predict weather patterns; the interactions are super complex and nonlinear. The Koopman operator allows these to be analyzed using linear techniques, simplifying the mess.

The Nuts and Bolts

Here's a breakdown to make things clearer:

  1. Koopman Operator Basics:
    • Definition: A Koopman operator, denoted K\mathcal{K}, transforms functions of the state of a dynamical system to another function of the state, capturing the system's evolution.
    • Appeal: Linear operators are much easier to analyze and predict than nonlinear systems.
  2. Transfer Operators:
    • Alongside the Koopman operator, this paper dives into other transfer operators like the Perron–Frobenius operator, which describes how densities evolve over time.
    • These operators help analyze not only dynamical systems but also random walks on graphs, which are handy in various applications like climate science and fluid dynamics.
  3. Infinitesimal Generators and Time-evolving Graphs:
    • The Koopman operator leads us to infinitesimal generators, allowing further insight by focusing on rates of change rather than the aggregate changes over time.
    • For graphs that evolve over time (think of a social network that grows and changes), this perspective is invaluable.

Show Me the Numbers

The paper ventures into a number of applications to present how effective these operators can be:

  • Molecular Dynamics: The Koopman operator can identify slow processes in protein folding. Eigenvalues correspond to metastable states, catching the system's most persistent behaviors.
  • Graphs and Networks Analysis: Applying Koopman theory to graphs, especially for clustering tasks, reveals substructures that might be hidden in raw data.

One demonstrable result from the paper shows how a random walk on a graph—representing a non-reversible process—can be analyzed to find clusters or coherent sets, even as the graph evolves over time. This can lead to more informed data segmentation and understandings of dynamic networks.

Beyond the Theory

Practical Implications:

  1. Data-driven Predictions:
    • With large datasets, these operators help predict future states without precise models.
    • Industries relying on timeseries data—like finance or meteorology—can benefit significantly.
  2. Network Analysis:
    • For social networks, these tools can detect community structures and anticipate changes.
    • Cybersecurity can leverage this to monitor network behavior and spot anomalies.

Theoretical Implications:

  1. Unified Approach:
    • These operators can unify the paper of both deterministic and stochastic systems.
    • Providing a means to deal with high-dimensional data efficiently.
  2. Future Extensions:
    • Extending these ideas to hypergraphs or graphons (infinite graphs) could further expand their applicability.
    • Exploring adaptive systems that evolve based on interactions can lead to deeper insights.

What’s Next?

Given the promising results, future research can cover:

  • Adaptive and Co-evolving Networks: Focus on networks that change not just over time but in response to internal and external stimuli.
  • Hypergraph Analysis: Extending the current techniques to more complex structures like hypergraphs.
  • Efficient Algorithms: Developing faster algorithms to handle the massive scale of real-world applications.

This paper successfully exemplifies how bridging theoretical math with practical data science can lead to powerful new tools. For data scientists keen on leveraging advanced techniques, understanding and using Koopman operators could be the next big step.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com