Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Evaluating Supply Chain Resilience During Pandemic Using Agent-based Simulation (2405.08830v2)

Published 13 May 2024 in cs.MA, cs.IR, and cs.SI

Abstract: Recent pandemics have highlighted vulnerabilities in our global economic systems, especially supply chains. Possible future pandemic raises a dilemma for businesses owners between short-term profitability and long-term supply chain resilience planning. In this study, we propose a novel agent-based simulation model integrating extended Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) epidemiological model and supply and demand economic model to evaluate supply chain resilience strategies during pandemics. Using this model, we explore a range of supply chain resilience strategies under pandemic scenarios using in silico experiments. We find that a balanced approach to supply chain resilience performs better in both pandemic and non-pandemic times compared to extreme strategies, highlighting the importance of preparedness in the form of a better supply chain resilience. However, our analysis shows that the exact supply chain resilience strategy is hard to obtain for each firm and is relatively sensitive to the exact profile of the pandemic and economic state at the beginning of the pandemic. As such, we used a machine learning model that uses the agent-based simulation to estimate a near-optimal supply chain resilience strategy for a firm. The proposed model offers insights for policymakers and businesses to enhance supply chain resilience in the face of future pandemics, contributing to understanding the trade-offs between short-term gains and long-term sustainability in supply chain management before and during pandemics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (99)
  1. Analysing governmental response to the covid-19 pandemic, Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (2021).
  2. The impacts of covid-19 pandemic on public transit demand in the united states, PLOS ONE 15 (2020) 1–22.
  3. A. Erkoreka, Origins of the spanish influenza pandemic (1918-1920) and its relation to the first world war, J Mol Genet Med 30 (2009) 190–194.
  4. Mortality burden of the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic in europe, Influenza 3 (2009) 99–106.
  5. A. A. Toda, Susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) dynamics of Covid-19 and economic impact, Covid Economics 1 (2020) 43–63.
  6. Economic uncertainty before and during the covid-19 pandemic, Journal of Public Economics 191 (2020) 104274.
  7. After the lockdown: macroeconomic adjustment to the covid-19 pandemic in sub-saharan africa, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36 (2020) S338–S358.
  8. W. McKibbin, D. Vines, Global macroeconomic cooperation in response to the covid-19 pandemic: a roadmap for the g20 and the imf, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36 (2020) S297–S337.
  9. Spatio-temporal influence of non-pharmaceutical interventions policies on pandemic dynamics and the economy: The case of covid-19, Research Economics (2021).
  10. Supply and demand shocks in the covid-19 pandemic: An industry and occupation perspective, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36 (2020) S94–S137.
  11. Changes in consumers’ purchase patterns as a consequence of the covid-19 pandemic, Mathematics 9 (2021).
  12. J. R. Francis, Covid-19: Implications for supply chain management, Frontiers of Health Services Management 37 (2020) 33–38.
  13. Supply and demand shocks in the COVID-19 pandemic: An industry and occupation perspective, arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06759 (2020).
  14. Supply chain recovery challenges in the wake of covid-19 pandemic, Journal of Business Research 136 (2021) 316–329.
  15. Covid-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 148 (2021) 102271.
  16. Towards increasing synergistic effects of resilience strategies in supply chain network design, Omega 116 (2023) 102819.
  17. A. A. Conti, Historical and methodological highlights of quarantine measures: from ancient plague epidemics to current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis 91 (2020) 226–229.
  18. P. Curtin, K. D. Patterson, Pandemic influenza, 1700-1900: a study in historical epidemiology, The University of Chicago Press, 1986.
  19. Impact of covid-19 in food supply chain: Disruptions and recovery strategy, Current Research in Behavioral Sciences 2 (2021) 100017.
  20. L. Shami, T. Lazebnik, Financing and managing epidemiological-economic crises: Are we ready for another outbreak?, Journal of Policy Modeling 45 (2023) 74–89.
  21. Planning with ants: Efficient path planning with rapidly exploring random trees and ant colony optimization, International journal of advanced robotic systems (2016) 1–16.
  22. A. Gunjan, S. Bhattacharyya, A brief review of portfolio optimization techniques, Artificial Intelligence Review (2022) 56.
  23. N. V. Sahinidis, Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities, Computers & Chemical Engineering 28 (2004) 971–983.
  24. Modeling, analysis, and optimization under uncertainties: a review, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 64 (2021) 2909–2945.
  25. Supply chain management during and post-covid-19 pandemic: Mitigation strategies and practical lessons learned, Journal of Business Research 142 (2022) 1125–1139.
  26. A supply chain disruption risk mitigation model to manage covid-19 pandemic risk, Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021).
  27. S. Ishida, Perspectives on supply chain management in a pandemic and the post-covid-19 era, IEEE Engineering Management Review 48 (2020) 146–152.
  28. B. Scala, C. F. Lindsay, Supply chain resilience during pandemic disruption: evidence from healthcare, Supply Chain Management 64 (2021) 2909–2945.
  29. Supply chain resilience during the covid-19 pandemic, Technology in Society 68 (2022) 101847.
  30. R. E. Lucas, Econometric policy evaluation: A critique, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1 (1976) 19–46. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167223176800036. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2231(76)80003-6.
  31. Microfounded tax revenue forecast model with heterogeneous population and genetic algorithm approach, Computational Economics (2023).
  32. Applying machine learning algorithms to predict the size of the informal economy, Computational Economics (2024).
  33. Employee engagement during covid-19 in malaysia, Frontiers in Sociology (2022).
  34. Digital twin integrated reinforced learning in supply chain and logistics, Logistics 5 (2021).
  35. Evolutionary digital twin model with an agent-based discrete-event simulation method, Applied Intelligence 53 (2022) 6178–6194.
  36. Agent-based simulation of a financial market, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 299 (2001) 319–327.
  37. Csonnet: An agent-based modeling software system for discrete time simulation, in: 2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 2021, pp. 1–12.
  38. Agent-based explanations in AI: Towards an abstract framework, in: International Workshop on Explainable, Transparent Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Springer, 2020, pp. 3–20.
  39. L. Tesfatsion, Agent-based computational economics: Growing economies from the bottom up, Artificial Life 8 (2002).
  40. D. Ivanov, A. Dolgui, A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of industry 4.0, Production Planning & Control 32 (2021) 775–788.
  41. Federated machine learning for privacy preserving, collective supply chain risk prediction, International Journal of Production Research 61 (2023) 8115–8132.
  42. I. Jackson, D. Ivanov, A beautiful shock? exploring the impact of pandemic shocks on the accuracy of ai forecasting in the beauty care industry, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 180 (2023) 103360.
  43. An agent-based model for supply chain recovery in the wake of the covid-19 pandemic, Computers & Industrial Engineering 158 (2021) 107401.
  44. D. Ivanov, Supply chain resilience: Conceptual and formal models drawing from immune system analogy, Omega 127 (2024) 103081.
  45. Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the covid-19 pandemic, Environment Systems and Decisions 40 (2020) 222–243.
  46. M. Casson, N. Wadeson, The economic theory of international supply chains: A systems view, International Journal of the Economics of Business 20 (2013) 163–186.
  47. D. Zhang, A network economic model for supply chain versus supply chain competition, Omega 34 (2006) 283–295.
  48. H. Min, G. Zhou, Supply chain modeling: past, present and future, Computers & Industrial Engineering 43 (2002) 231–249.
  49. B. M. Beamon, Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods, International Journal of Production Economics 55 (1998) 281–294.
  50. Dynamic modeling and control of supply chain systems: A review, Computers & Operations Research 35 (2008) 3530–3561.
  51. A supply chain network equilibrium model with random demands, European Journal of Operational Research 156 (2004) 194–212.
  52. Agent-based modeling and simulation for the electricity market with residential demand response, CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems 7 (2021) 368–380.
  53. Using agent-based models for prediction in complex and wicked systems, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 24 (2021) 2.
  54. J. M. Epstein, Agent-based computational models and generative social science, Complexity 4 (1999) 41–60.
  55. Creating spatially-detailed heterogeneous synthetic populations for agent-based microsimulation, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 91 (2022) 101717.
  56. M. North, A theoretical formalism for analyzing agent-based models, Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling 2 (2014).
  57. A theoretical formalism for analyzing agent-based models, Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling (2007).
  58. A. Negahban, L. Yilmax, Agent-based simulation applications in marketing research: an integrated review, Journal of Simulation 8 (2013) 129–142.
  59. Modeling epidemic spread in transportation networks: A review, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 8 (2021) 139–152.
  60. T. Lazebnik, Computational applications of extended sir models: A review focused on airborne pandemics, Ecological Modelling 483 (2023) 110422.
  61. Agent-based simulation of pedestrian dynamics for exposure time estimation in epidemic risk assessment, Journal of Public Health 31 (2023) 221–228.
  62. E. Cuevas, An agent-based model to evaluate the covid-19 transmission risks in facilities, Computers in Biology and Medicine 121 (2020) 103827.
  63. W. O. Kermack, A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proceedings of the Royal Society 115 (1927) 700–721.
  64. T. Lazebnik, A. Alexi, High resolution spatio-temporal model for room-level airborne pandemic spread, Mathematics 11 (2023) 426.
  65. P. Ghadimi, C. Heavey, A review of applications of agent-based modelling and simulation in supplier selection problem, in: 2013 8th EUROSIM Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 2013, pp. 101–107.
  66. Agent-based simulation in logistics and supply chain research: Literature review and analysis, in: U. Clausen, S. Langkau, F. Kreuz (Eds.), Advances in Production, Logistics and Traffic, Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 45–59.
  67. Agent-based simulation of competitive performance for supply chains based on combined contracts, International Journal of Production Economics 193 (2017) 663–676.
  68. Q. Long, W. Zhang, An integrated framework for agent based inventory–production–transportation modeling and distributed simulation of supply chains, Information Sciences 277 (2014) 567–581.
  69. Supply chain risk management: An agent-based simulation to study the impact of retail stockouts, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 60 (2013) 676–686.
  70. The development of multi-agent system using finite state machine, in: 2009 International Conference on New Trends in Information and Service Science, 2009, pp. 203–206.
  71. Competitive exclusion in a multi-strain immuno-epidemiological influenza model with environmental transmission, Journal of Biological Dynamics 10 (2016).
  72. C. M. Macal, To agent-based simulation from system dynamics, in: Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, 2010, pp. 371–382.
  73. Intervention policy influence on the effect of epidemiological crisis on industry-level production through input–output networks, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 87 (2023) 101553.
  74. K. R. Srinath, Python – the fastest growing programming language, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 4 (2017).
  75. Out-of-distribution generalization via risk extrapolation (rex), in: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139, PMLR, 2021, pp. 5815–5826.
  76. Towards out-of-distribution generalization: A survey, arXiv (2023).
  77. Glister: Generalization based data subset selection for efficient and robust learning, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, 2021, pp. 8110–8118.
  78. R. S. Olson, J. H. Moore, Tpot: A tree-based pipeline optimization tool for automating machine learning, in: JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceedings, volume 64, 2016, pp. 66–74.
  79. J. H. Holland, Genetic algorithms, Scientific American 267 (1992) 66–73.
  80. Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure, Ecography 40 (2017) 913–929.
  81. Machine learning and deep learning, Electron Markets 31 (2021) 685–695.
  82. B. Azhagusundari, A. S. Thanamani, Feature selection based on information gain, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering 2 (2013) 18–21.
  83. Understanding heart failure patients ehr clinical features via shap interpretation of tree-based machine learning model predictions, AMIA Annu Symposium Proceedings Archive (2021) 813–822.
  84. Interpreting financial time series with shap values, in: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, IBM Corp., 2019, p. 166–172.
  85. Pandemic management by a spatio–temporal mathematical model, International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 24 (2023) 2307–2324.
  86. R. Moran, Optimal decision making in heterogeneous and biased environments, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22 (2015) 38–53.
  87. A group decision making model for integrating heterogeneous information, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 48 (2018) 982–992.
  88. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic, Nature (2006) 448–452.
  89. Influence of airborne transmission of sars-cov-2 on covid-19 pandemic. a review, Environmental Research 188 (2020) 109861.
  90. H. Inaba, On a new perspective of the basic reproduction number in heterogeneous environments, Journal of Mathematical Biology 65 (2011) 309–348.
  91. Effect of population density on epidemics, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 510 (2018) 713–724.
  92. How to advance theory through literature reviews in logistics and supply chain management, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 51 (2021) 1090–1107.
  93. Short-term and long-term impacts of a quick response strategy on a dual channel apparel supply chain, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 29 (2019) 1950190.
  94. Short‐term vs. long‐term contracting: Empirical assessment of the ratchet effect in supply chain interaction, Production and Operations Management 30 (2021) 2252–2272.
  95. X. Yang, J. Wang, The relationship between sustainable supply chain management and enterprise economic performance: does firm size matter?, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 38 (2023) 553–567.
  96. L. Shami, T. Lazebnik, Economic aspects of the detection of new strains in a multi-strain epidemiological-mathematical model, Chaos Solitons & Fractals 165 (2023) 112823.
  97. P. Minayev, N. Ferguson, Improving the realism of deterministic multi-strain models: implications for modelling influenza a, Journal of the Royal Society Interface (2008).
  98. Multi-species prey–predator dynamics during a multi-strain pandemic, Chaos 33 (2023) 073106.
  99. O. Khyar, K. Allali, Global dynamics of a multi-strain seir epidemic model with general incidence rates: application to covid-19 pandemic, Nonlinear Dynamics 102 (2020) 489–509.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com