Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Beyond Scaling Laws: Understanding Transformer Performance with Associative Memory (2405.08707v2)

Published 14 May 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: Increasing the size of a Transformer does not always lead to enhanced performance. This phenomenon cannot be explained by the empirical scaling laws. Furthermore, the model's enhanced performance is closely associated with its memorization of the training samples. We present a theoretical framework that sheds light on the memorization during pre-training of transformer-based LLMs. We model the behavior of Transformers with associative memories using Hopfield networks, such that each transformer block effectively conducts an approximate nearest-neighbor search. In particular, the energy function in modern continuous Hopfield networks serves as an explanation for the attention mechanism, which we approximate with a distance-based energy function. By observing that the softmax function corresponds to the gradient of the LogSumExp function in the energy, and employing the majorization-minimization technique, we construct a global energy function designed to capture the layered architecture. We demonstrate a dependency between the model size and the dataset size for the model to achieve optimal performance, and we show that the achievable cross-entropy loss is bounded from below.

PDF HTML Abstract

Understanding Transformer Performance with Associative Memory

Introduction

Transformers have become the go-to architecture for a wide range of NLP tasks, from text generation to question-answering. The general rule of thumb in the NLP community is that increasing the size of a Transformer model usually leads to better performance. However, this isn't always the case. Sometimes, smaller models can perform on par with or even better than larger ones. The paper "Beyond Scaling Laws: Understanding Transformer Performance with Associative Memory" investigates why this happens by diving into the theoretical aspects of Transformer models.

The Core Idea

The paper introduces a novel theoretical framework to explain the behavior of Transformers, particularly focusing on their memorization processes and performance dynamics. It models the behavior of Transformer layers using concepts from associative memory, specifically Hopfield networks. The key takeaway here is that each Transformer block acts like an approximate nearest-neighbor search mechanism.

Associative Memory and Hopfield Networks

Associative memory is a concept where stored information can be retrieved using a part of the content. For example, given an incomplete input, the system retrieves the complete stored pattern that closely matches the input. The researchers utilize a generalized version of the classic Hopfield network called the Modern Continuous Hopfield Network (MCHN) to model this behavior. This new framework can store a large number of well-separated data points and retrieve them based on their similarity to the input.

The Internal Workings: Attention and Feed-Forward Layers

Transformers consist of multiple layered blocks, each containing attention and feed-forward sub-layers. Attention layers help capture long-range dependencies in data by performing a form of weighted average over the entire sequence. Feed-forward layers are more about processing individual elements.

What's interesting is that these can be integrated into a unified view. This makes it easier to understand the underlying mechanics using a majorization-minimization technique, which is often used to simplify complex optimization problems.

The New Energy Function

One of the critical contributions of this paper is the introduction of a new energy function to model the Transformer layers. This energy function helps explain how Transformers find and align the nearest stored memories (patterns) with the given input. The proposed energy function is more straightforward and doesn't require additional regularization terms like previous models.

Practical Implications and Experimental Validation

The theoretical results are validated using empirical experiments. Here's a summary of what the researchers did:

  1. Experiments with GPT-2: The researchers conducted experiments using GPT-2 models of different sizes and trained them on varying amounts of data. They found that the training cross-entropy loss (which is a measure of how well the model is performing) stabilizes above a value of 1 for larger datasets.
  2. Vanilla Transformers: They also trained simpler vanilla Transformer models on a high-quality dataset with 2 million tokens. The training losses again stabilized around a value of 1, which corroborates their theoretical findings.

Strong Numerical Results

  • Cross-Entropy Loss: The paper states that the cross-entropy loss, a common metric to measure model performance, is bounded from below by a constant approximately equal to 1. This is significant because it challenges the belief that larger datasets and models will indefinitely improve performance.

The Implications

Practical Implications

  1. Model Size and Efficiency: The results suggest that simply increasing the number of parameters in a model might not lead to better performance. This finding can help organizations save computational resources and time.
  2. Dataset Quality: The paper also underscores the importance of high-quality data. Well-separated patterns in the training data significantly enhance the model's ability to generalize.

Theoretical Insights

  1. Layer-wise Optimization: Using the majorization-minimization technique to construct a global energy function tailored to the Transformer architecture provides a fresh way to understand how these models work.
  2. Associative Memory: Modeling Transformer layers as associative memories opens new avenues for theoretical research in understanding other types of neural networks.

Future Directions

While the paper provides substantial insights, several questions remain:

  1. Different Architectures: How would these findings translate to other neural network architectures?
  2. Real-World Applications: The applicability of these theoretical insights to real-world, noisy datasets is an exciting area for future research.

Conclusion

The paper "Beyond Scaling Laws: Understanding Transformer Performance with Associative Memory" provides groundbreaking (but not sensational) insights into why bigger isn't always better when it comes to Transformer models. By diving deep into associative memory and proposing a new energy function for Transformers, the researchers offer a robust framework for understanding and optimizing these powerful models. As the field of AI continues to evolve, such theoretical underpinnings will be crucial for making informed decisions in both research and industry settings.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. S.-I. Amari. Learning patterns and pattern sequences by self-organizing nets of threshold elements. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 100(11):1197–1206, 1972.
  2. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023.
  3. T. W. J. Banks and T. Warkentin. Gemma: Introducing new state-of-the-art open models, 2024.
  4. Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias–variance trade-off. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(32):15849–15854, 2019.
  5. Quantifying memorization across neural language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  6. Word acquisition in neural language models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 10:1–16, 2022.
  7. Language model behavior: A comprehensive survey. Computational Linguistics, pages 1–58, 2024.
  8. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(240):1–113, 2023.
  9. Triple descent and the two kinds of overfitting: Where & why do they appear? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:3058–3069, 2020.
  10. On a model of associative memory with huge storage capacity. Journal of Statistical Physics, 168:288–299, 2017.
  11. Understanding emergent abilities of language models from the loss perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15796, 2024.
  12. Extending context window of large language models via semantic compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09571, 2023.
  13. Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08540, 2024.
  14. Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14913, 2020.
  15. A. Gokaslan and V. Cohen. Openwebtext corpus. http://Skylion007.github.io/OpenWebTextCorpus, 2019.
  16. Your classifier is secretly an energy based model and you should treat it like one. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
  17. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556, 2022a.
  18. An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:30016–30030, 2022b.
  19. J. J. Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79(8):2554–2558, 1982.
  20. Ragged: Towards informed design of retrieval augmented generation systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09040, 2024.
  21. Minicpm: Unveiling the potential of small language models with scalable training strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06395, 2024.
  22. Mistral 7b. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06825, 2023.
  23. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361, 2020.
  24. Generalization through memorization: Nearest neighbor language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00172, 2019.
  25. D. Krotov. Hierarchical associative memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06446, 2021.
  26. D. Krotov and J. J. Hopfield. Dense associative memory for pattern recognition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 29, 2016.
  27. A tutorial on energy-based learning. Predicting Structured Data, 1(0), 2006.
  28. Does syntax need to grow on trees? sources of hierarchical inductive bias in sequence-to-sequence networks. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:125–140, 2020.
  29. Scaling data-constrained language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  30. Leave no context behind: Efficient infinite context transformers with infini-attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07143, 2024.
  31. Grokking of hierarchical structure in vanilla transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18741, 2023.
  32. Deep double descent: Where bigger models and more data hurt. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2021(12):124003, 2021.
  33. J. Ortega and W. Rheinboldt. Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables, volume 30. SIAM, 1970.
  34. Grokking: Generalization beyond overfitting on small algorithmic datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02177, 2022.
  35. O. Press and L. Wolf. Using the output embedding to improve language models. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, pages 157–163, 2017.
  36. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. 2019.
  37. Scaling language models: Methods, analysis & insights from training gopher. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11446, 2021.
  38. Hopfield networks is all you need. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  39. Using deepspeed and megatron to train megatron-turing NLG 530b, a large-scale generative language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.11990, 2022.
  40. Augmenting self-attention with persistent memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.01470, 2019.
  41. Majorization-minimization algorithms in signal processing, communications, and machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 65(3):794–816, 2016.
  42. Memorization without overfitting: Analyzing the training dynamics of large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:38274–38290, 2022.
  43. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023.
  44. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  45. Effective long-context scaling of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16039, 2023.
  46. Baichuan 2: Open large-scale language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10305, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Xueyan Niu (15 papers)
  2. Bo Bai (71 papers)
  3. Lei Deng (81 papers)
  4. Wei Han (202 papers)
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube