Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

MS MARCO Web Search: a Large-scale Information-rich Web Dataset with Millions of Real Click Labels (2405.07526v1)

Published 13 May 2024 in cs.IR

Abstract: Recent breakthroughs in large models have highlighted the critical significance of data scale, labels and modals. In this paper, we introduce MS MARCO Web Search, the first large-scale information-rich web dataset, featuring millions of real clicked query-document labels. This dataset closely mimics real-world web document and query distribution, provides rich information for various kinds of downstream tasks and encourages research in various areas, such as generic end-to-end neural indexer models, generic embedding models, and next generation information access system with LLMs. MS MARCO Web Search offers a retrieval benchmark with three web retrieval challenge tasks that demand innovations in both machine learning and information retrieval system research domains. As the first dataset that meets large, real and rich data requirements, MS MARCO Web Search paves the way for future advancements in AI and system research. MS MARCO Web Search dataset is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/MS-MARCO-Web-Search.

PDF HTML Abstract

Exploring MS MARCO Web Search: A Comprehensive Dataset for Web-Scale Information Retrieval

Introduction to MS MARCO Web Search Dataset

In the pursuit of refining search technologies and LLMs, datasets play a crucial role. Among the newer contributions to this field is the MS MARCO Web Search dataset. This dataset champions the cause of large-scale, information-rich data collection with millions of real-world user interactions in the form of clicked query-document pairs, originating from real search logs. It aims to not just enhance the models but also to provide a robust ground for new research directions in AI and search technology.

The Significance of Real Clicked Query-Data Pairs

The unique selling point of the MS MARCO Web Search dataset is its incorporation of real clicked query-data pairs. These are not just theoretical constructs but are derived from actual user interactions, which adds a layer of practicality and realism to the dataset. Here’s a breakdown of why this is crucial:

  • Real-World Application: Models trained on this dataset can better predict or understand real-user queries due to their training on real-world data.
  • Diversity of Data: It includes a variety of languages and query types, which enriches the model's ability to handle diverse inputs.
  • Volume and Veracity: With millions of data points, the dataset provides a broad foundation for testing and enhancing information retrieval systems.

Challenges Addressed by the Dataset

MS MARCO Web Search doesn't just supply data; it brings forward challenges inherent in modern web-scale retrieval systems:

  1. Handling Scale: The dataset’s vast size poses a challenge in processing and utilizing the information effectively within reasonable computational limits.
  2. Quality of Data: Ensuring that the high volume of data maintains a high quality and relevance requires careful curation and perhaps sophisticated filtering mechanisms.
  3. Diversity in Queries: Given the multilingual nature and varied informational needs reflected in the queries, models need to evolve to handle such diversity efficiently.

Future Implications for AI and Search Technologies

The introduction of a dataset like MS MARCO Web Search paves the way for numerous future research opportunities and practical applications:

  • Enhancement of Search Engines: By training on a dataset close to the operational data of search engines, improvements in accuracy, and user satisfaction can be achieved.
  • Development of Robust LLMs: LLMs can be better equipped to handle misinformation and the dynamic nature of languages and user interactions.
  • Cross-Discipline Innovations: The dataset could lead to interesting crossover innovations involving machine learning, linguistics, and information science.

Predictions and Speculations

With its comprehensive coverage and real-world data grounding, the MS MARCO Web Search dataset is likely to be a catalyst in AI and search technology advancements. We might see:

  • Improved Query Handling: More nuanced understanding and responses to user queries, especially in multilingual contexts.
  • Adaptive Learning Models: Models that adjust to new information and user behavior patterns more dynamically.
  • Ethical AI Development: Enhanced capabilities to handle data privacy and ethical considerations due to the realistic dataset base.

In conclusion, the MS MARCO Web Search dataset is not merely a larger pile of data. It is a thoughtfully curated resource aimed at confronting the present challenges and anticipating future needs in web-scale data handling and retrieval. This dataset is not just a tool for improvement but a potential harbinger of the next generation of search technologies and AI models.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (58)
  1. [n. d.]. Billion-scale ANNS Benchmarks. https://big-ann-benchmarks.com/.
  2. [n. d.]. Common Crawl.
  3. [n. d.]. Robust04. https://trec.nist.gov/data/robust/04.guidelines.html.
  4. ANN-benchmarks: A benchmarking tool for approximate nearest neighbor algorithms. In International conference on similarity search and applications. Springer, 34–49.
  5. Artem Babenko and Victor Lempitsky. 2014. The inverted multi-index. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 37, 6 (2014), 1247–1260.
  6. Artem Babenko and Victor Lempitsky. 2016. Efficient indexing of billion-scale datasets of deep descriptors. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2055–2063.
  7. Revisiting the inverted indices for billion-scale approximate nearest neighbors. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 202–216.
  8. Autoregressive search engines: Generating substrings as document identifiers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 31668–31683.
  9. Jamie Callan. 2012. The lemur project and its clueweb12 dataset. In Invited talk at the SIGIR 2012 Workshop on Open-Source Information Retrieval.
  10. Bge m3-embedding: Multi-lingual, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03216 (2024).
  11. SPANN: Highly-efficient Billion-scale Approximate Nearest Neighborhood Search. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 5199–5212.
  12. Overview of the TREC 2004 Terabyte Track. In TREC.
  13. Overview of the TREC 2009 Web Track.. In Trec, Vol. 9. 20–29.
  14. ORCAS: 20 million clicked query-document pairs for analyzing search. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2983–2989.
  15. Zhuyun Dai and Jamie Callan. 2019. Context-aware sentence/passage term importance estimation for first stage retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10687 (2019).
  16. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).
  17. Luyu Gao and Jamie Callan. 2022. Unsupervised Corpus Aware Language Model Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2843–2853.
  18. Semantic models for the first-stage retrieval: A comprehensive review. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 40, 4 (2022), 1–42.
  19. Accelerating Large-Scale Inference with Anisotropic Vector Quantization. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). 3887–3896.
  20. Convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences. Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014).
  21. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2333–2338.
  22. Diskann: Fast accurate billion-point nearest neighbor search on a single node. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019).
  23. Product quantization for nearest neighbor search. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33, 1 (2010), 117–128.
  24. Searching in one billion vectors: re-rank with source coding. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 861–864.
  25. Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs. IEEE Transactions on Big Data (2019).
  26. Yannis Kalantidis and Yannis Avrithis. 2014. Locally optimized product quantization for approximate nearest neighbor search. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2321–2328.
  27. Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04906 (2020).
  28. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 7 (2019), 453–466.
  29. Carlos Lassance and Stéphane Clinchant. 2023. Naver Labs Europe (SPLADE)@ TREC Deep Learning 2022. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12574 (2023).
  30. Question and Answer Test-Train Overlap in Open-Domain Question Answering Datasets. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume. 1000–1008.
  31. Twinbert: Distilling knowledge to twin-structured compressed BERT models for large-scale retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2645–2652.
  32. microsoft. 0a. Bing search. https://www.bing.com/.
  33. microsoft. 0b. New Bing. https://www.bing.com/new.
  34. Webgpt: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09332 (2021).
  35. MS MARCO: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. In CoCo@ NIPS.
  36. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 27730–27744.
  37. ClueWeb22: 10 billion web documents with rich information. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 3360–3362.
  38. Deep sentence embedding using long short-term memory networks: Analysis and application to information retrieval. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 24, 4 (2016), 694–707.
  39. Understanding the Behaviors of BERT in Ranking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.07531 (2019).
  40. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084 (2019).
  41. HM-ANN: Efficient Billion-Point Nearest Neighbor Search on Heterogeneous Memory. In In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33.
  42. Stephen E Robertson and Steve Walker. 1994. Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In SIGIR’94: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, organised by Dublin City University. Springer, 232–241.
  43. Cross-lingual learning-to-rank with shared representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers). 458–463.
  44. Real-Time Open-Domain Question Answering with Dense-Sparse Phrase Index. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 4430–4441.
  45. GLOW: Global Weighted Self-Attention Network for Web Search. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 519–528.
  46. Learning semantic representations using convolutional neural networks for web search. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web. 373–374.
  47. Ian Soboroff. 2021. Overview of TREC 2021. In 30th Text REtrieval Conference. Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  48. Diskann: Fast accurate billion-point nearest neighbor search on a single node. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 13766–13776.
  49. Transformer memory as a differentiable search index. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 21831–21843.
  50. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023).
  51. A neural corpus indexer for document retrieval. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 25600–25614.
  52. Distill-vq: Learning retrieval oriented vector quantization by distilling knowledge from dense embeddings. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1513–1523.
  53. C-pack: Packaged resources to advance general chinese embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07597 (2023).
  54. Approximate nearest neighbor negative contrastive learning for dense text retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00808 (2020).
  55. Leveraging Advantages of Interactive and Non-Interactive Models for Vector-Based Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.01992 (2021).
  56. Evaluating Interpolation and Extrapolation Performance of Neural Retrieval Models. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2486–2496.
  57. SimANS: Simple Ambiguous Negatives Sampling for Dense Text Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track. 548–559.
  58. Deep Query Likelihood Model for Information Retrieval. In ECIR.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (31)
  1. Qi Chen (194 papers)
  2. Xiubo Geng (36 papers)
  3. Corby Rosset (21 papers)
  4. Carolyn Buractaon (2 papers)
  5. Jingwen Lu (5 papers)
  6. Tao Shen (87 papers)
  7. Kun Zhou (217 papers)
  8. Chenyan Xiong (95 papers)
  9. Yeyun Gong (78 papers)
  10. Paul Bennett (17 papers)
  11. Nick Craswell (51 papers)
  12. Xing Xie (220 papers)
  13. Fan Yang (877 papers)
  14. Bryan Tower (3 papers)
  15. Nikhil Rao (34 papers)
  16. Anlei Dong (6 papers)
  17. Wenqi Jiang (15 papers)
  18. Zheng Liu (312 papers)
  19. Mingqin Li (4 papers)
  20. Chuanjie Liu (6 papers)
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar