Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Global Data-Driven Model for The Hippocampus and Nucleus Accumbens of Rat From The Local Field Potential Recordings (LFP) (2405.06732v1)

Published 10 May 2024 in q-bio.NC and cs.LG

Abstract: In brain neural networks, Local Field Potential (LFP) signals represent the dynamic flow of information. Analyzing LFP clinical data plays a critical role in improving our understanding of brain mechanisms. One way to enhance our understanding of these mechanisms is to identify a global model to predict brain signals in different situations. This paper identifies a global data-driven based on LFP recordings of the Nucleus Accumbens and Hippocampus regions in freely moving rats. The LFP is recorded from each rat in two different situations: before and after the process of getting a reward which can be either a drug (Morphine) or natural food (like popcorn or biscuit). A comparison of five machine learning methods including Long Short Term Memory (LSTM), Echo State Network (ESN), Deep Echo State Network (DeepESN), Radial Basis Function (RBF), and Local Linear Model Tree (LLM) is conducted to develop this model. LoLiMoT was chosen with the best performance among all methods. This model can predict the future states of these regions with one pre-trained model. Identifying this model showed that Morphine and natural rewards do not change the dynamic features of neurons in these regions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. Little, Simon, and Peter Brown. “What brain signals are suitable for feedback control of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease?.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1265.1 (2012): 9-24.
  2. Hass, Joachim, Loreen Hertäg, and Daniel Durstewitz. “A detailed data-driven network model of prefrontal cortex reproduces key features of in vivo activity.” PLoS computational biology 12.5 (2016): e1004930.
  3. Kose, Utku. “An ant-lion optimizer-trained artificial neural network system for chaotic electroencephalogram (EEG) prediction.” Applied Sciences 8.9 (2018): 1613.
  4. Zhao, Liang, and Yupu Yang. “PSO-based single multiplicative neuron model for time series prediction.” Expert Systems with Applications 36.2 (2009): 2805-2812.
  5. Samanta, B. “Prediction of chaotic time series using computational intelligence.” Expert Systems with Applications 38.9 (2011): 11406-11411.
  6. Prasad, Sharat C., and Piyush Prasad. “Deep recurrent neural networks for time series prediction.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.5949 (2014).
  7. Saucedo, Jose A. Marmolejo, Jude D. Hemanth, and Utku Kose. “Prediction of electroencephalogram time series with electro-search optimization algorithm trained adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.” IEEE Access 7 (2019): 15832-15844.
  8. Volkow, Nora D., Michael Michaelides, and Ruben Baler. “The neuroscience of drug reward and addiction.” Physiological reviews 99.4 (2019): 2115-2140.
  9. Hochreiter, Sepp, and Jürgen Schmidhuber. “Long short-term memory.” Neural computation 9.8 (1997): 1735-1780.
  10. Jaeger, Herbert. “The ‘echo state’ approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks-with an erratum note.” Bonn, Germany: German National Research Center for Information Technology GMD Technical Report 148.34 (2001): 13.
  11. Schiller, Ulf D., and Jochen J. Steil. “Analyzing the weight dynamics of recurrent learning algorithms.” Neurocomputing 63 (2005): 5-23.
  12. Li, Decai, Min Han, and Jun Wang. “Chaotic time series prediction based on a novel robust echo state network.” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 23.5 (2012): 787-799.
  13. Gallicchio, Claudio, Alessio Micheli, and Luca Pedrelli. “Deep reservoir computing: A critical experimental analysis.” Neurocomputing 268 (2017): 87-99.
  14. Nelles, Oliver. “Nonlinear dynamic system identification.” Nonlinear System Identification. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001. 547-577.
  15. Makaremi, Iman, Alireza Fatehi, and Babak Nadjar Araabi. “Lipschitz numbers: a medium for delay estimation.” IFAC Proceedings Volumes 41.2 (2008): 7468-7473.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com