Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution (and How to Find Them) (2405.06627v3)

Published 10 May 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and stat.ML

Abstract: As AI / ML gain widespread adoption, practitioners are increasingly seeking means to quantify and control the risk these systems incur. This challenge is especially salient when such systems have autonomy to collect their own data, such as in black-box optimization and active learning, where their actions induce sequential feedback-loop shifts in the data distribution. Conformal prediction is a promising approach to uncertainty and risk quantification, but prior variants' validity guarantees have assumed some form of ``quasi-exchangeability'' on the data distribution, thereby excluding many types of sequential shifts. In this paper we prove that conformal prediction can theoretically be extended to \textit{any} joint data distribution, not just exchangeable or quasi-exchangeable ones. Although the most general case is exceedingly impractical to compute, for concrete practical applications we outline a procedure for deriving specific conformal algorithms for any data distribution, and we use this procedure to derive tractable algorithms for a series of AI/ML-agent-induced covariate shifts. We evaluate the proposed algorithms empirically on synthetic black-box optimization and active learning tasks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. Conformal risk control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.02814, 2022.
  2. Conformal pid control for time series prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36, 2023.
  3. High-throughput ml-guided design of diverse single-domain antibodies against sars-cov-2. bioRxiv, pp.  2023–12, 2023.
  4. Predictive inference with the jackknife+. 2021.
  5. Conformal prediction beyond exchangeability. The Annals of Statistics, 51(2):816–845, 2023.
  6. Improved online conformal prediction via strongly adaptive online learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.07869, 2023.
  7. Low-n protein engineering with data-efficient deep learning. Nature methods, 18(4):389–396, 2021.
  8. Airfoil Self-Noise. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C5VW2C.
  9. Buza, K. BlogFeedback. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C58S3F.
  10. Adaptive conformal prediction for motion planning among dynamic agents. In Learning for Dynamics and Control Conference, pp.  300–314. PMLR, 2023.
  11. Sample design of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey household component, 1998-2007. US Department of Health & Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and …, 2008.
  12. Conformal prediction under feedback covariate shift for biomolecular design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(43):e2204569119, 2022.
  13. Non-exchangeable conformal risk control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01262, 2023.
  14. Achieving risk control in online learning settings. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023.
  15. The limits of distribution-free conditional predictive inference. Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA, 10(2):455–482, 2021.
  16. Frank, A. Uci machine learning repository. http://archive. ics. uci. edu/ml, 2010.
  17. Adaptive conformal inference under distribution shift. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:1660–1672, 2021.
  18. Conformal prediction with conditional guarantees. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12616, 2023.
  19. Protein design with guided discrete diffusion. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36, 2023.
  20. Selection by prediction with conformal p-values. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(244):1–41, 2023.
  21. Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques. MIT press, 2009.
  22. Risk-controlling model selection via guided bayesian optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.01692, 2023.
  23. Papadopoulos, H. Inductive conformal prediction: Theory and application to neural networks. In Tools in artificial intelligence. Citeseer, 2008.
  24. Pearl, J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge University Press, USA, 2nd edition, 2009. ISBN 052189560X.
  25. Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shift. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp.  844–853. PMLR, 2021.
  26. Learning the pattern of epistasis linking genotype and phenotype in a protein. Nature communications, 10(1):4213, 2019.
  27. Jaws: Auditing predictive uncertainty under covariate shift. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:35907–35920, 2022.
  28. Jaws-x: addressing efficiency bottlenecks of conformal prediction under standard and feedback covariate shift. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  28167–28190. PMLR, 2023.
  29. Redmond, M. Communities and Crime. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C53W3X.
  30. Optimizing hyperparameters with conformal quantile regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03623, 2023.
  31. Shimodaira, H. Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of statistical planning and inference, 90(2):227–244, 2000.
  32. Accelerating bayesian optimization for biological sequence design with denoising autoencoders. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  20459–20478. PMLR, 2022.
  33. Bayesian optimization with conformal prediction sets. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.  959–986. PMLR, 2023.
  34. Conformal prediction under covariate shift. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  35. Conformal predictive decision making. In Conformal and Probabilistic Prediction and Applications, pp.  52–62. PMLR, 2018.
  36. Algorithmic learning in a random world, volume 29. Springer, 2005.
  37. Adaptive conformal predictions for time series. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  25834–25866. PMLR, 2022.
  38. Bayesian optimization with formal safety guarantees via online conformal prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17815, 2023.
  39. Optimal trade-off control in machine learning–based library design, with application to adeno-associated virus (aav) for gene therapy. Science Advances, 10(4):eadj3786, 2024.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Drew Prinster (4 papers)
  2. Samuel Stanton (14 papers)
  3. Anqi Liu (51 papers)
  4. Suchi Saria (35 papers)
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper presents a robust theoretical extension of conformal prediction that guarantees validity for any data distribution, including non-exchangeable cases.
  • It introduces an algorithmic framework that adapts CP methods to dynamic scenarios, addressing challenges like agent-induced covariate shifts.
  • The methods empower adaptive systems in areas such as reinforcement learning and robotics to maintain measurable and reliable prediction uncertainties.

Understanding Conformal Prediction in Dynamic Contexts

In the increasingly autonomous world of machine learning systems that gather and process their own data, understanding and managing the risks associated with output predictions has never been more critical. This exploration delves deep into extending conformal prediction (CP), a statistical technique traditionally limited to static data scenarios, to dynamic, self-adaptive systems like those seen in active learning and black-box optimization.

Expanding the Reach of Conformal Prediction

At its core, conformal prediction provides a way to gauge the uncertainty of predictions made by statistical models. Standard CP approaches, however, buckle under scenarios where data changes over time or due to the actions of the learning algorithm itself — a phenomenon not uncommon in modern AI systems.

Bridging Theory with Practicability

The paper presents a comprehensive theoretical extension of CP that can theoretically adapt to any data distribution, not just those that are stationary or where order doesn’t matter (exchangeability). This is a massive pivot in how we think about applying CP in practical scenarios.

Here’s a distilled view of the proposed approach:

  • Theoretical Foundations: The authors prove that CP can be adapted for any form of data distribution, provided that there's a valid way to calculate or estimate the probability associated with the arrangement of data points.
  • Practical Application: Recognizing the impracticality of this in complex scenarios due to computational limits, they offer a method to practically apply this extended theory by deriving specific algorithms tailored to the data distribution in question.

Key Contributions and Methodology

The crux of the research lies in its dual contribution:

  1. Generalizing CP Theoretically: The theory now holds for any joint distribution of data, overcoming boundaries set by previous assumptions of data exchangeability.
  2. Algorithmic Framework for Practical Usage: The paper outlines a procedure for creating specific CP algorithms that cater to any given data distribution, particularly focusing on sequences of data that change in response to algorithmic decisions (agent-induced covariate shifts).

Implications and Potential

Practical Implications

The ability to use CP in dynamic settings opens up new avenues for deploying AI in areas where continuous learning from incremental data is essential. Systems can now adaptively learn and make decisions while maintaining a quantifiable grip on the uncertainty of those decisions.

Theoretical Advances

This paper moves the needle by challenging the existing norms of conformal prediction applicability confined by the exchangeability assumption. By providing a robust framework that accommodates sequential and agent-responsive shifts in data distribution, it sets a new theoretical baseline for future explorations.

Speculations on Future Developments

Looking forward, this enriched understanding and methodology for CP can catalyze advancements in areas like reinforcement learning, robotics, and other AI fields where adaptiveness and learning over time are crucial. We might see more reliable AI systems that can assert the confidence level of their decisions dynamically, enhancing trust and safety in automated decision-making processes.

Moreover, further research might focus on reducing computational demands and refining estimation methods that can scale efficiently with the increasing complexity and volume of data in practical applications.

Conclusion

This paper takes significant strides in marrying the robust, theoretical assurances of conformal prediction with the flexible, dynamic needs of modern machine learning systems. As AI continues to evolve into an ever more autonomous force, having tools that can assure reliability and manage risk in changing environments will be paramount. This work not only addresses a fundamental theoretical gap but also provides a pathway for practical application, marking a pivotal step for future explorations in the field of advanced AI systems.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown