Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Greedy Heuristics for Sampling-based Motion Planning in High-Dimensional State Spaces (2405.03411v2)

Published 6 May 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: Informed sampling techniques improve the convergence rate of sampling-based planners by guiding the sampling toward the most promising regions of the problem domain, where states that can improve the current solution are more likely to be found. However, while this approach significantly reduces the planner's exploration space, the sampling subset may still be too large if the current solution contains redundant states with many twists and turns. This article addresses this problem by introducing a greedy version of the informed set that shrinks only based on the maximum heuristic cost of the state along the current solution path. Additionally, we present Greedy RRT* (G-RRT*), a bi-directional version of the anytime Rapidly-exploring Random Trees algorithm that uses this greedy informed set to focus sampling on the promising regions of the problem domain based on heuristics. Experimental results on simulated planning problems, manipulation problems on Barrett WAM Arms, and on a self-reconfigurable robot, Panthera, show that G-RRT* produces asymptotically optimal solution paths and outperforms state-of-the-art RRT* variants, especially in high dimensions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (49)
  1. Akgun B and Stilman M (2011) Sampling heuristics for optimal motion planning in high dimensions. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, pp. 2640–2645.
  2. Alterovitz R, Patil S and Derbakova A (2011) Rapidly-exploring roadmaps: Weighing exploration vs. refinement in optimal motion planning. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, pp. 3706–3712.
  3. Arslan O and Tsiotras P (2013) Use of relaxation methods in sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, pp. 2421–2428.
  4. Bialkowski J, Otte M and Frazzoli E (2013) Free-configuration biased sampling for motion planning. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp. 1272–1279.
  5. Diankov R (2010) Automated construction of robotic manipulation programs. PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
  6. Dijkstra EW et al. (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik 1(1): 269–271.
  7. Dobson A and Bekris KE (2014) Sparse roadmap spanners for asymptotically near-optimal motion planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research 33(1): 18–47.
  8. Elbanhawi M and Simic M (2014) Sampling-based robot motion planning: A review. Ieee access 2: 56–77.
  9. Ferguson D and Stentz A (2006) Anytime rrts. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp. 5369–5375.
  10. Gammell JD, Barfoot TD and Srinivasa SS (2018) Informed sampling for asymptotically optimal path planning. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 34(4): 966–984.
  11. Gammell JD, Barfoot TD and Srinivasa SS (2020) Batch informed trees (bit*): Informed asymptotically optimal anytime search. The International Journal of Robotics Research 39(5): 543–567.
  12. Gammell JD, Srinivasa SS and Barfoot TD (2014) Informed rrt*: Optimal sampling-based path planning focused via direct sampling of an admissible ellipsoidal heuristic. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp. 2997–3004.
  13. Gammell JD, Strub MP and Hartmann VN (2022) Planner developer tools (pdt): Reproducible experiments and statistical analysis for developing and testing motion planners. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating Motion Planning Performance (EMPP), IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).
  14. Hart PE, Nilsson NJ and Raphael B (1968) A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4(2): 100–107.
  15. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 7346–7352.
  16. In: Robotics: the algorithmic perspective: 1998 workshop on the algorithmic foundations of robotics. pp. 141–154.
  17. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation. IEEE, pp. 1651–1656.
  18. Jeong IB, Lee SJ and Kim JH (2019) Quick-rrt*: Triangular inequality-based implementation of rrt* with improved initial solution and convergence rate. Expert Systems with Applications 123: 82–90.
  19. In: 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT). IEEE, pp. 1471–1477.
  20. Karaman S and Frazzoli E (2011) Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning. The international journal of robotics research 30(7): 846–894.
  21. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, pp. 1478–1483.
  22. IEEE transactions on Robotics and Automation 12(4): 566–580.
  23. Khatib O (1986) Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. The international journal of robotics research 5(1): 90–98.
  24. Kim D, Lee J and Yoon Se (2014) Cloud rrt: Sampling cloud based rrt. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 2519–2526.
  25. Kim MC and Song JB (2015) Informed rrt* towards optimality by reducing size of hyperellipsoid. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). IEEE, pp. 244–248.
  26. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, pp. 1670–1677.
  27. Koide K, Miura J and Menegatti E (2018) A portable 3d lidar-based system for long-term and wide-area people behavior measurement. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst .
  28. Kuffner JJ and LaValle SM (2000) Rrt-connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning. In: Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065), volume 2. IEEE, pp. 995–1001.
  29. LaValle SM (2006) Planning algorithms. Cambridge university press.
  30. LaValle SM and Kuffner Jr JJ (2001) Randomized kinodynamic planning. The international journal of robotics research 20(5): 378–400.
  31. Expert systems with applications 152: 113425.
  32. Expert Systems with Applications 184: 115457.
  33. IEEE Access 8: 19842–19852.
  34. Otte M and Correll N (2013) C-forest: Parallel shortest path planning with superlinear speedup. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 29(3): 798–806.
  35. Pan J, Chitta S and Manocha D (2012) Fcl: A general purpose library for collision and proximity queries. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, pp. 3859–3866.
  36. In: ICRA workshop on open source software, volume 3. Kobe, Japan, p. 5.
  37. Qureshi AH and Ayaz Y (2016) Potential functions based sampling heuristic for optimal path planning. Autonomous Robots 40: 1079–1093.
  38. Reif JH (1979) Complexity of the mover’s problem and generalizations. In: 20th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1979). IEEE Computer Society, pp. 421–427.
  39. Salzman O and Halperin D (2016) Asymptotically near-optimal rrt for fast, high-quality motion planning. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 32(3): 473–483.
  40. Strub MP and Gammell JD (2020) Adaptively informed trees (ait*): Fast asymptotically optimal path planning through adaptive heuristics. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp. 3191–3198.
  41. Strub MP and Gammell JD (2022) Adaptively informed trees (ait*) and effort informed trees (eit*): Asymmetric bidirectional sampling-based path planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research 41(4): 390–417.
  42. Sucan IA, Moll M and Kavraki LE (2012) The open motion planning library. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19(4): 72–82.
  43. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 17(4): 1748–1758.
  44. Robotica 37(10): 1677–1694.
  45. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA). IEEE, pp. 1639–1646.
  46. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 7(3): 690–700.
  47. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 25(5): 2376–2386.
  48. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, pp. 3856–3861.
  49. Zhang T, Wang J and Meng MQH (2021) Generative adversarial network based heuristics for sampling-based path planning. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 9(1): 64–74.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Phone Thiha Kyaw (1 paper)
  2. Anh Vu Le (2 papers)
  3. Lim Yi (1 paper)
  4. Prabakaran Veerajagadheswar (1 paper)
  5. Mohan Rajesh Elara (6 papers)
  6. Minh Bui Vu (1 paper)

Summary

  • The paper introduces Greedy RRT*, a novel algorithm that integrates greedy informed sampling with bidirectional search to quickly identify near-optimal solutions.
  • It leverages an L2 greedy informed set to focus sampling in critical regions, substantially improving efficiency and lowering path costs.
  • Empirical results demonstrate significant speed, success rate, and cost improvements over standard RRT* methods in simulations and robotic tasks.

Overview of Greedy Heuristics for Sampling-based Motion Planning in High-Dimensional State Spaces

The paper "Greedy Heuristics for Sampling-based Motion Planning in High-Dimensional State Spaces" addresses the limitations of existing sampling-based motion planning algorithms, specifically RRT* and its variants, which often struggle with sampling efficiency and convergence speed in complex, high-dimensional planning problems. Herein, the authors present Greedy RRT* (G-RRT*), a novel algorithm that unifies existing insights gained from various RRT* adaptations by leveraging greedy search techniques and heuristics.

Main Contributions

The paper's primary contributions can be summarized as follows:

  1. Greedy Informed Sampling: The authors propose a modification of the direct informed sampling technique, leading to the introduction of a L2L^2 greedy informed set. This approach strategically reduces the ellipsoidal exploration region based on heuristic cost information instead of the path cost from an initial solution, enhancing sampling efficiency in tortuous, high-dimensional paths.
  2. Bidirectional Search Strategy: G-RRT* incorporates a bidirectional search perspective, maintaining two trees growing from the initial and goal states, respectively. This design choice helps identify initial solutions more rapidly compared to previous single-tree methods.
  3. Empirical Validation: The paper includes empirical demonstrations across simulated environments and manipulation tasks, supplemented by validation using a self-reconfigurable robot, illustrating a superior asymptotic performance over state-of-the-art methods.

Key Results and Analyses

Through simulation experiments, G-RRT* showed substantial improvement over both the classical RRT* and more recent RRT* adaptations, particularly in high-dimensional problems. The analyses suggest G-RRT* solves problem instances faster, therefore achieving higher success rates and reduced path costs. This enhancement is largely attributed to the dual strategy of improved informed sampling and bidirectional search, allowing efficient exploitation and exploration of the problem domain.

Additionally, despite the increased complexity, G-RRT* maintains the almost-surely asymptotic optimality property. This correctness is mathematically grounded by ensuring that the sampling process continues over regions necessarily containing the optimal paths.

Implications and Future Directions

The work outlined in this paper advances the field of robotic path planning by improving the applicability of sampling-based methods to challenging high-dimensional state spaces. Practically, the improvements in computation efficiency allow for better real-time performance in autonomous systems, such as industrial robots or self-reconfigurable mobile platforms. Theoretically, this work opens avenues for further integrating heuristic information into sampling strategies, potentially extending into learning-based approaches where heuristics could be dynamically optimized based on environmental interactions.

In future work, extensions of G-RRT* could include adaptation to dynamic environments, incorporating online learning for heuristic adjustments, or hybridizing with probabilistic roadmap methods for improved multi-query performance. Integrating the insights from G-RRT* into other asymptotically optimal planners can also be explored, possibly yielding new algorithms with hybrid exploration strategies that benefit from both rapid initial solutions and efficient global convergence.

Through these contributions, the paper presents a highly effective algorithm that paves the way for robust motion planning solutions viable in high-dimensional and real-world scenarios.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com