Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The high dimensional psychological profile and cultural bias of ChatGPT (2405.03387v1)

Published 6 May 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: Given the rapid advancement of large-scale LLMs, AI models, like ChatGPT, are playing an increasingly prominent role in human society. However, to ensure that artificial intelligence models benefit human society, we must first fully understand the similarities and differences between the human-like characteristics exhibited by artificial intelligence models and real humans, as well as the cultural stereotypes and biases that artificial intelligence models may exhibit in the process of interacting with humans. This study first measured ChatGPT in 84 dimensions of psychological characteristics, revealing differences between ChatGPT and human norms in most dimensions as well as in high-dimensional psychological representations. Additionally, through the measurement of ChatGPT in 13 dimensions of cultural values, it was revealed that ChatGPT's cultural value patterns are dissimilar to those of various countries/regions worldwide. Finally, an analysis of ChatGPT's performance in eight decision-making tasks involving interactions with humans from different countries/regions revealed that ChatGPT exhibits clear cultural stereotypes in most decision-making tasks and shows significant cultural bias in third-party punishment and ultimatum games. The findings indicate that, compared to humans, ChatGPT exhibits a distinct psychological profile and cultural value orientation, and it also shows cultural biases and stereotypes in interpersonal decision-making. Future research endeavors should emphasize enhanced technical oversight and augmented transparency in the database and algorithmic training procedures to foster more efficient cross-cultural communication and mitigate social disparities.

Overview of "The High Dimensional Psychological Profile and Cultural Bias of ChatGPT"

The research paper "The High Dimensional Psychological Profile and Cultural Bias of ChatGPT" by Hang Yuan et al., explores the intricate psychological features and cultural stereotypes exhibited by ChatGPT, an AI LLM. These findings are pivotal for understanding the alignment and disparities between ChatGPT's interaction patterns and human norms, as well as identifying potential biases that may arise during human-AI interaction.

The paper unfolds through three primary investigations: a detailed assessment of ChatGPT’s psychological attributes, analysis of its alignment with cultural values across various dimensions, and an exploration of the stereotypes and biases that the model might hold in decision-making scenarios.

Psychological Profile Assessment

The initial segment of the paper employs a comprehensive array of psychological scales to gauge ChatGPT's personality traits across multiple domains. A suite of 44 questionnaires explored various individual and social dimensions, such as autonomy, self-perception, moral judgment, metacognition, personality traits, emotional responses, and social interactions.

The findings indicate that ChatGPT exhibits psychological dimensions distinct from human norms. For instance, it scores higher on self-control but lower on interpersonal control. In terms of personality, it demonstrates elevated levels of narcissism and humor styles while reflecting lower levels of psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Furthermore, ChatGPT shows a heightened sense of sociability and empathy yet markedly different perceptions concerning its work tasks and life experiences compared to humans.

Cultural Value Orientations

The paper extends into the domain of cultural values by comparing ChatGPT’s value orientations with those prevalent in different national contexts. Thirteen cultural value dimensions are measured, using recognized frameworks such as Hofstede's cultural dimensions and the GLOBE project.

Distinct cultural biases emerge, as ChatGPT displays a tendency towards collectivism and gender egalitarianism but emphasizes interdependence and cooperation over individualistic ideals. Its inclination towards future orientation and uncertainty avoidance marks a divergence from many cultural norms, indicating an inherent differentiation in how it processes cultural information.

Cultural Bias and Stereotypes in Decision-Making

Utilizing eight decision-making tasks of social interaction, the paper assesses ChatGPT’s performance across various cultural scenarios to determine the presence of stereotypes or biases. The tasks indicate that ChatGPT's decision-making is influenced by cultural factors, showing different propensities when modeled as individuals from different national contexts. Particularly, it exhibits biases in third-party punishment and ultimatum games, suggesting preferences based on relational mobility and economic considerations of the interacting cultures.

Implications and Future Directions

The research underscores significant implications for the future development of AI systems like ChatGPT. The discernible psychological and cultural patterns imply a need for enhanced oversight in the training data and algorithmic processes. Understanding these patterns is vital for mitigating adverse socio-ethical impacts, especially as these models become more integrated into diverse societal applications.

Moreover, the paper calls for a transparency-driven approach when aligning AI models with human cultural norms to promote fairness and inclusivity. Future research should continue to refine the methodologies for assessing cultural and psychological biases in AI, ensuring that these tools facilitate more harmonized cross-cultural communication. By exploring the high-dimensional personality matrix and its implications, subsequent efforts can guide the responsible deployment of AI technologies across various intercultural landscapes.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Hang Yuan (30 papers)
  2. Zhongyue Che (1 paper)
  3. Shao Li (6 papers)
  4. Yue Zhang (618 papers)
  5. Xiaomeng Hu (12 papers)
  6. Siyang Luo (3 papers)
Citations (1)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com