Quantifying Distribution Shifts and Uncertainties for Enhanced Model Robustness in Machine Learning Applications (2405.01978v1)
Abstract: Distribution shifts, where statistical properties differ between training and test datasets, present a significant challenge in real-world machine learning applications where they directly impact model generalization and robustness. In this study, we explore model adaptation and generalization by utilizing synthetic data to systematically address distributional disparities. Our investigation aims to identify the prerequisites for successful model adaptation across diverse data distributions, while quantifying the associated uncertainties. Specifically, we generate synthetic data using the Van der Waals equation for gases and employ quantitative measures such as Kullback-Leibler divergence, Jensen-Shannon distance, and Mahalanobis distance to assess data similarity. These metrics en able us to evaluate both model accuracy and quantify the associated uncertainty in predictions arising from data distribution shifts. Our findings suggest that utilizing statistical measures, such as the Mahalanobis distance, to determine whether model predictions fall within the low-error "interpolation regime" or the high-error "extrapolation regime" provides a complementary method for assessing distribution shift and model uncertainty. These insights hold significant value for enhancing model robustness and generalization, essential for the successful deployment of machine learning applications in real-world scenarios.
- Conformal prediction: A pragmatic approach to prediction reliability. Machine Learning, 28(4):543–567, 2016.
- Twelve key challenges in medical machine learning and solutions, 2022.
- A brief review of domain adaptation. Advances in data science and information engineering: proceedings from ICDATA 2020 and IKE 2020, pages 877–894, 2021.
- Dropout as a bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02142, 2016.
- Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. Journal of machine learning research, 17(59):1–35, 2016.
- A survey of uncertainty in deep neural networks. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(Suppl 1):1513–1589, 2023.
- Generative adversarial nets. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, and K.Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 27. Curran Associates, Inc., 2014.
- Information-theoretic bounds on transfer generalization gap based on jensen-shannon divergence. In 2021 29th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pages 1461–1465. IEEE, 2021.
- On information and sufficiency. The annals of mathematical statistics, 22(1):79–86, 1951.
- Towards out-of-distribution generalization: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.13624, 2021.
- Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 97–105. PMLR, 2015.
- Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis. On the generalized distance in statistics. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (2008-), 80:S1–S7, 2018.
- Deep learning for safe autonomous driving: Current challenges and future directions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(7):4316–4336, 2020.
- Can you trust your model's uncertainty? evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift. In H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
- A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(10):1345–1359, 2010.
- Dataset shift in machine learning. Mit Press, 2022.
- Recommender system based on temporal models: a systematic review. Applied Sciences, 10(7):2204, 2020.
- Hidetoshi Shimodaira. Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 90(2):227–244, 2000.
- Direct divergence approximation between probability distributions and its applications in machine learning. Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, 7(2):99–111, 2013.
- Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research, 9(11), 2008.
- Johannes Diderik Van Der Waals and John Shipley Rowlinson. On the continuity of the gaseous and liquid states. Courier Corporation, 2004.
- mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.09412, 2017.