LOG-LIO2: A LiDAR-Inertial Odometry with Efficient Uncertainty Analysis (2405.01316v2)
Abstract: Uncertainty in LiDAR measurements, stemming from factors such as range sensing, is crucial for LIO (LiDAR-Inertial Odometry) systems as it affects the accurate weighting in the loss function. While recent LIO systems address uncertainty related to range sensing, the impact of incident angle on uncertainty is often overlooked by the community. Moreover, the existing uncertainty propagation methods suffer from computational inefficiency. This paper proposes a comprehensive point uncertainty model that accounts for both the uncertainties from LiDAR measurements and surface characteristics, along with an efficient local uncertainty analytical method for LiDAR-based state estimation problem. We employ a projection operator that separates the uncertainty into the ray direction and its orthogonal plane. Then, we derive incremental Jacobian matrices of eigenvalues and eigenvectors w.r.t. points, which enables a fast approximation of uncertainty propagation. This approach eliminates the requirement for redundant traversal of points, significantly reducing the time complexity of uncertainty propagation from $\mathcal{O} (n)$ to $\mathcal{O} (1)$ when a new point is added. Simulations and experiments on public datasets are conducted to validate the accuracy and efficiency of our formulations. The proposed methods have been integrated into a LIO system, which is available at https://github.com/tiev-tongji/LOG-LIO2.
- S. Thrun, “Probabilistic robotics,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 52–57, 2002.
- C. Yuan, X. Liu, X. Hong, and F. Zhang, “Pixel-level extrinsic self calibration of high resolution lidar and camera in targetless environments,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7517–7524, 2021.
- B. Jiang and S. Shen, “A lidar-inertial odometry with principled uncertainty modeling,” in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 13 292–13 299.
- Z. Liu and F. Zhang, “Balm: Bundle adjustment for lidar mapping,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3184–3191, 2021.
- C. Yuan, W. Xu, X. Liu, X. Hong, and F. Zhang, “Efficient and probabilistic adaptive voxel mapping for accurate online lidar odometry,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 8518–8525, 2022.
- T. Tasdizen and R. Whitaker, “Cramer-rao bounds for nonparametric surface reconstruction from range data,” in Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings. IEEE, 2003, pp. 70–77.
- K.-H. Bae, D. Belton, and D. D. Lichti, “A closed-form expression of the positional uncertainty for 3d point clouds,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 577–590, 2008.
- B. Welford, “Note on a method for calculating corrected sums of squares and products,” Technometrics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 419–420, 1962.
- K. Huang, J. Zhao, Z. Zhu, C. Ye, and T. Feng, “Log-lio: A lidar-inertial odometry with efficient local geometric information estimation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 459–466, 2023.
- C. Bai, T. Xiao, Y. Chen, H. Wang, F. Zhang, and X. Gao, “Faster-lio: Lightweight tightly coupled lidar-inertial odometry using parallel sparse incremental voxels,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 4861–4868, 2022.
- W. Xu, Y. Cai, D. He, J. Lin, and F. Zhang, “Fast-lio2: Fast direct lidar-inertial odometry,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2053–2073, 2022.
- D. He, W. Xu, and F. Zhang, “Kalman filters on differentiable manifolds,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.03804, 2021.
- J. Yin, A. Li, T. Li, W. Yu, and D. Zou, “M2dgr: A multi-sensor and multi-scenario slam dataset for ground robots,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2266–2273, 2021.