Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Active Cell Balancing for Extended Operational Time of Lithium-Ion Battery Systems in Energy Storage Applications

Published 2 May 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY | (2405.00973v1)

Abstract: Cell inconsistency within a lithium-ion battery system poses a significant challenge in maximizing the system operational time. This study presents an optimization-driven active balancing method to minimize the effects of cell inconsistency on the system operational time while simultaneously satisfying the system output power demand and prolonging the system operational time in energy storage applications. The proposed method utilizes a fractional order model to forecast the terminal voltage dynamics of each cell within a battery system, enhanced with a particle-swarm-optimisation-genetic algorithm for precise parameter identification. It is implemented under two distinct cell-level balancing topologies: independent cell balancing and differential cell balancing. Subsequently, the current distribution for each topology is determined by resolving two optimization control problems constrained by the battery's operational specifications and power demands. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated by extensive experiments based on the two balancing topologies. The results demonstrate that the proposed method increases the operational time by 3.2%.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. J. Tian, C. Chen, W. Shen, F. Sun, and R. Xiong, “Deep learning framework for lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation: Recent advances and future perspectives,” Energy Storage Mater., vol. 61, pp. 102883, Aug. 2023.
  2. A. Farakhor, D. Wu, Y. Wang, and H. Fang, “Scalable optimal power management for large-scale battery energy storage systems,” IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., in press, doi: 10.1109/TTE.2023.3331243.
  3. Q. Yu, C. Wang, J. Li, R. Xiong, and M. Pett, “Challenges and outlook for lithium-ion battery fault diagnosis methods from the laboratory to real world applications,” eTransp., vol. 17, pp. 100254, Jul. 2023.
  4. Q. Yang, C. Xu, M. Geng, and H. Meng, “A review on models to prevent and control lithium-ion battery failures: From diagnostic and prognostic modeling to systematic risk analysis,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 74, pp. 109230, Dec. 2023.
  5. M. Waseem, M. Ahmad, A. Parveen, and M. Suhaib, “Battery technologies and functionality of battery management system for EVs: Current status, key challenges, and future prospectives,” J. Power Sources, vol. 580, pp. 233349, Oct. 2023.
  6. G. Wang, Y. Sun, K. Pang, B. Li, X. Han and Y. Zheng, “Quantitative diagnosis of the soft short circuit for LiFePO4 battery packs between voltage plateaus,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 61, pp. 106683, May. 2023.
  7. M. Lipu, M. Hannan, A. Hussain, S. Ansari, S. Rahman, M. Saad, and K. Muttaqi,“Real-time state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using optimized random forest regression algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 639-648, Jan. 2023.
  8. Y. Yang, J. Hu, C. Chen, and J. Wei, “Balancing awareness fast charging control for lithium-ion battery pack using deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 3718-3727, Apr. 2024.
  9. Q. Zhao, K. Liao, J. Yang, Z. He, and Y. Xu, “Aging rate equalization strategy for battery energy storage systems in microgrids,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2024.
  10. S. Wang, Y. Wang, G. Chen, D. Wei and Y. Shang, “An efficient and compact equalizer based on forward-flyback conversion for large-scale energy storage systems,” IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1222-1232, Mar. 2024.
  11. A. Turksoy, and A. Teke, “A fast and energy-efficient nonnegative least square-based optimal active battery balancing control strategy for electric vehicle applications,” Energy, vol. 262, pp. 125409, Jan. 2023.
  12. Y. Wang, X. Hu, X. Deng, Y. Cheng, and W. Yin, “Design and experiment of a low-temperature charging preheating system for power battery packs with an integrated dissipative balancing function,” J. Power Sources, vol. 588, pp. 233740, Dec. 2023.
  13. Y. Wang, P. Liu, X. Jin, K. Zhang, Y. Cheng, and W. Yin, “Design and experiment of a novel stepwise preheating system for battery packs coupled with non-dissipative balancing function based on supercapacitors,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 66, pp. 107444, Aug. 2023.
  14. H. Wang, M. Rasheed, R. Hassan, M. Kamel, S. Tong, and R. Zan, “Life-extended active battery control for energy storage using electric vehicle retired batteries,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 38, no. 6, pp, 6801-6805, Jun. 2023.
  15. N. Ghaeminezhad, Q. Ouyang, X. Hu, G. Xu, and Z. Wang, “Active cell equalization topologies analysis for battery packs: A systematic review,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 9119-9135, Aug. 2021
  16. A. Samanta, and S. Chowdhuri, “Active cell balancing of lithium-ion battery pack using dual DC-DC converter and auxiliary lead-acid battery,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 33, pp. 102109, Jan. 2021.
  17. M. Esfandyari, M. Yazdi, V. Esfahanian, M. Tehrani, H. Nehzati, and Q. Shekoofa, “A hybrid model predictive and fuzzy logic based control method for state of power estimation of series-connected Lithium-ion batteries in HEVs,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 24, pp. 100758, Aug. 2019.
  18. Q. Ouyang, J. Chen, J. Zheng, and H. Fang, “Optimal cell-to-cell balancing topology design for serially connected lithiu-ion battery packs,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 350-360, Jan. 2018.
  19. N. Yang, L. Han, R. Liu, Z. Wei, H. Liu, and C. Xiang, “Multiobjective Intelligent Energy Management for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Multiagent Reinforcement Learning,” IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 4294-4305, Sep. 2023.
  20. L. Mccurlie, M. Preindl, and A. Emadi, “Fast model predictive control for redistributive lithium-ion battery balancing,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 64, no. 2, Feb. 2017.
  21. F. Hoekstra, H. Bergveld, and M. Donkers, “Optimal control of active cell balancing: Extending the range and useful lifetime of a battery pack,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2759-2766, Nov. 2022.
  22. Q. Ouyang, W. Han, C. Zou, G. Xu and Z. Wang, “Cell balancing control for lithium-ion battery packs: A hierarchical optimal approach,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 5065-5075, Aug. 2020.
  23. Y. Ma, P. Duan, Y. Sun, and H. Chen, “Equalization of lithium-ion battery pack based on fuzzy logic control in electric vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 65, no. 8, Aug. 2018.
  24. Q. Ouyang, Y. Zhang, N. Ghaeminezhad, J. Chen, Z. Wang, X. Hu, and J. Li, “Module-based active equalization for battery packs: A two-layer model predictive control strategy,” IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 149-249, Mar. 2022.
  25. J. Chen, A. Behal, Z. Li, and C. Li, “Active battery cell balancing by real-time model predictive control for extending electric vehicle driving range,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., doi: 10.1109/TASE.2023.3291679.
  26. T. Fan. S. Liu, H. Yang, P. Li, and B. Qu, “A fast active balancing strategy based on model predictive control for lithium-ion battery packs,” Energy, vol. 279, pp. 128028, Sep. 2023.
  27. Q. Ouyang, J. Chen, J. Zheng, and Y.G. Hong, “SOC estimation-based quasi-sliding mode control for cell balancing in lithium-ion battery packs,” IEEE Trans Ind Electron, vol. 65, no. 4 pp. 3427-3436, Apr. 2018.
  28. G. Dong, F. Yang, K. Tsui, and C. Zou, “Active balancing of lithium-ion batteries using graph theory and A-star searching algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2587-2599, Apr. 2021.
  29. B. Wang, Z. Liu, S. E. Li, S. J. Moura, and H. Peng, “State-of-charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on a nonlinear fractional model,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–11, Jan. 2017.
  30. X. Hu, H. Yuan, C. Zou, Z. Li, and L. Zhang, “Co-Estimation of state of charge and state of health for lithium-ion batteries based on fractional-order calculus,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 10319–10329, Nov. 2018.
  31. G. Plett, “Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs -part 3. State and parameter estimation,” J. Power Sources, vol. 134, pp. 277-292, Aug. 2004.
  32. C. Zou, X. Hu, S. Dey, L. Zhang, and X. Tang, “Nonlinear fractional-order estimator with guaranteed robustness and stability for lithium-ion batteries,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 5951-5961, Jul. 2018.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces an optimization-based active cell balancing strategy that mitigates cell voltage disparities to extend battery life.
  • It employs a fractional-order model combined with a hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for precise state estimation and current distribution control.
  • Experimental validation under UDDS profiles demonstrated a 3.2% increase in operational time, confirming the method's effectiveness.

Active Cell Balancing for Extended Operational Time of Lithium-Ion Battery Systems in Energy Storage Applications

The paper "Active Cell Balancing for Extended Operational Time of Lithium-Ion Battery Systems in Energy Storage Applications" presents an optimization-driven methodology for active cell balancing to address the challenge of cell inconsistency, which constrains the operational capacity of lithium-ion battery systems. The research taps into fractional order modeling and advanced optimization algorithms to enhance system-level performance primarily in energy storage contexts.

Lithium-Ion Battery System and Cell Balancing

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are a primary power source for ESSs, given their favorable energy density and longevity. The challenge lies in the inherent cell inconsistency which can originate from manufacturing discrepancies. This inconsistency results in imbalances in State of Charge (SOC) and terminal voltages, often constraining an entire system's capacity to that of its weakest cell. Consequently, cell balancing becomes critical to extend operational time efficiently. Active balancing emerges as a superior approach over passive balancing due to its ability to manage cell discrepancies during both charging and discharging cycles.

Proposed Methodology

The paper introduces a novel active balancing method, focusing on extending the operational time of LIB systems while satisfying power demands. Unlike traditional methods focused on balancing SOC or voltage, this approach embodies an optimization-centric active balancing method. This method employs a fractional-order model augmented by a Particle Swarm Optimization-Genetic Algorithm (PSO-GA) for parameter identification. Two cell-level balancing topologies are analyzed: independent cell balancing and differential cell balancing.

Model Development

The fractional-order model of the battery system is central in this approach, allowing it to forecast terminal voltage dynamics effectively. The model utilizes the Gr{\"u}nwald-Letnikov definition for fractional derivatives, and the dynamics are expressed as state-space equations representative of individual cells and extended to the entire battery system connected in series. The mathematical formulation enables a more precise state estimation and a refined model predictive control (MPC) strategy for current distribution across battery system cells.

Optimization-Based Control Strategy

For each balancing topology, a distinct control optimization strategy is laid out, solved using MPC. The independent cell balancing topology enables decentralized current control through isolated DC-DC converters, optimizing each cell's current relative to its SOC. The differential balancing topology, on the other hand, leverages DC-DC bypass converters parallel to cells, allowing differential energy exchange. Both strategies are designed to optimize minimum cell voltage and prolong operational duration.

Experimental Validation and Results

The proposed solution was verified experimentally using a two-series NCR18650B battery setup under Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) profiles. The experiments demonstrated a 3.2% extension in operational time achieved through effective active balancing. The results substantiated the reduction in voltage disparity across cells and confirmed the enhanced performance and efficacy of the proposed PSO-GA-based optimization algorithm.

Numerical Results and Analysis

The experiments focused on analyzing the SOC estimation and current optimization under two topologies. The EKF-based SOC estimation achieved rapid convergence to actual SOC values despite initial estimation errors. Current distribution adjustments demonstrated through independent and differential topologies indicated that the independent balancing structure noticeably aligned cell voltages away from cut-off points, thus prolonging battery life.

Conclusion

The paper effectively demonstrates an advanced active balancing methodology leveraging fractional-order modeling and hybrid optimization algorithms for extending LIB system operational time. This research not only highlights an innovative control strategy but also provides an empirical foundation for future advancements in active cell balancing for enhanced energy storage applications. The numerical and experimental validations confirm the potential of sophisticated optimization techniques in achieving superior balancing performances, hinting at broader applications for large-scale battery systems in the renewable energy sector and beyond.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.