Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

BrainODE: Dynamic Brain Signal Analysis via Graph-Aided Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (2405.00077v1)

Published 30 Apr 2024 in cs.LG and eess.SP

Abstract: Brain network analysis is vital for understanding the neural interactions regarding brain structures and functions, and identifying potential biomarkers for clinical phenotypes. However, widely used brain signals such as Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) time series generated from functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) often manifest three challenges: (1) missing values, (2) irregular samples, and (3) sampling misalignment, due to instrumental limitations, impacting downstream brain network analysis and clinical outcome predictions. In this work, we propose a novel model called BrainODE to achieve continuous modeling of dynamic brain signals using Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE). By learning latent initial values and neural ODE functions from irregular time series, BrainODE effectively reconstructs brain signals at any time point, mitigating the aforementioned three data challenges of brain signals altogether. Comprehensive experimental results on real-world neuroimaging datasets demonstrate the superior performance of BrainODE and its capability of addressing the three data challenges.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. Dominic RW Burrows. Whole brain network dynamics of epileptic seizures at single cell resolution, 2022.
  2. Measuring fmri reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient. Neuroimage, 45(3):758–768, 2009.
  3. The neuro bureau preprocessing initiative: Open sharing of preprocessed neuroimaging data and derivatives. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 2013.
  4. The adolescent brain cognitive development (abcd) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 32:43–54, 2018.
  5. Neural ordinary differential equations. NeurIPS, 31, 2018.
  6. A whole brain fmri atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2012.
  7. BrainGB: A Benchmark for Brain Network Analysis with Graph Neural Networks. TMI, 2022.
  8. Interpretable graph neural networks for connectome-based brain disorder analysis. In MICCAI, 2022.
  9. Graph neural networks with learnable structural and positional representations, 2022.
  10. Polynomial matrix completion for missing data imputation and transductive learning. In AAAI, 2020.
  11. Edges in brain networks: Contributions to models of structure and function. Network Neuroscience, 6(1):1–28, 2022.
  12. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the human connectome project. NeuroImage, 80:105–124, 2013.
  13. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In NeurIPS, 2017.
  14. Correlations and dissociations between bold signal and p300 amplitude in an auditory oddball task: a parametric approach to combining fmri and erp. Magnetic resonance imaging, 20(4):319–325, 2002.
  15. Transformer quality in linear time. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 9099–9117, 2022.
  16. Learning continuous system dynamics from irregularly-sampled partial observations. NeurIPS, 2020.
  17. Coupled graph ode for learning interacting system dynamics. KDD ’21, 2021.
  18. Generalizing graph ode for learning complex system dynamics across environments. KDD ’23, 2023.
  19. Fbnetgen: Task-aware gnn-based fmri analysis via functional brain network generation. In MIDL, 2022.
  20. Brain network transformer, 2022.
  21. Brainnetcnn: Convolutional neural networks for brain networks; towards predicting neurodevelopment. In NeuroImage, 2017.
  22. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In ICLR, 2016.
  23. Consistency of regions of interest as nodes of fmri functional brain networks. Network Neuroscience, 1(3):254–274, 2017.
  24. Braingnn: Interpretable brain graph neural network for fmri analysis. In Medical Image Analysis, 2021.
  25. A cnn–lstm model for gold price time-series forecasting. Neural Comput. Appl., 32(23):17351–17360, 2020.
  26. Bayesian joint modeling of multiple brain functional networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(534):518–530, 2021. PMID: 34262233.
  27. Russell A Poldrack. Region of interest analysis for fmri. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2(1):67–70, 2007.
  28. Latent ordinary differential equations for irregularly-sampled time series. NeurIPS, 2019.
  29. A probabilistic model for the numerical solution of initial value problems. Statistics and Computing, 29(1):99–122, 2019.
  30. A symmetry-based method to infer structural brain networks from probabilistic tractography data. Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 10:46, 2016.
  31. Self-attention with relative position representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02155, 2018.
  32. Alex Sherstinsky. Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (rnn) and long short-term memory (lstm) network. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 404:132306, 2020.
  33. Analyzing complex functional brain networks: Fusing statistics and network science to understand the brain. Statistics Surveys, 7(none):1 – 36, 2013.
  34. Network modelling methods for fmri. Neuroimage, 54(2):875–891, 2011.
  35. Probabilistic transformer for time series analysis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 23592–23608, 2021.
  36. New insights into rhythmic brain activity from tms–eeg studies. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(4):182–189, 2009.
  37. Graph attention networks. In ICLR, 2018.
  38. How powerful are graph neural networks? In ICLR, 2019.
  39. Contrastive graph pooling for explainable classification of brain networks, 2023.
  40. Learning task-aware effective brain connectivity for fmri analysis with graph neural networks. In IEEE Big Data, 2022.
  41. Graph transformer networks. CoRR, abs/1911.06455, 2019.
  42. A transformer-based framework for multivariate time series representation learning. KDD ’21, 2021.

Summary

  • The paper introduces BrainODE, which uses Neural ODEs to continuously reconstruct fMRI BOLD signals while addressing missing data, irregular sampling, and misalignment.
  • It integrates convolutional networks and self-attention for precise latent state learning and dual-graph encoding to capture spatial and temporal brain interactions.
  • Experimental results show significant improvements in clinical prediction accuracy, with up to 27.4% AUC increase on real neuroimaging datasets.

Dynamic Brain Signal Analysis Using BrainODE

The paper introduces BrainODE, a compelling framework for the continuous modeling of dynamic brain signals, especially focusing on Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) time series derived from functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). The model primarily aims to address three significant challenges present in neuroimaging data: missing values, irregular sampling, and sampling misalignment. These challenges pose substantial hindrance in accurate brain network analysis and the prediction of clinical outcomes.

BrainODE leverages Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) to process dynamic brain signals continuously. By capturing latent initial states and mapping neural ODE functions from these signals, it can reconstruct brain signals at any desired point in time. This approach efficiently alleviates the triple threats posed by missing data, irregular samples, and misalignment. The paper illuminates on how traditional methods like polynomial interpolation and discrete computations of Pearson correlations fail to accurately model the intricate correlations among ROIs in dynamic brain networks.

The methodology underlying BrainODE encompasses several critical steps:

  1. Brain Latent State Learning: By employing a combination of CNNs and self-attention mechanisms, BrainODE effectively captures short-term brain activity while maintaining long-term dependencies in the BOLD signals. This duality ensures that both local interactions and overarching patterns in the brain data are accounted for without losing the spatial context of ROIs.
  2. Graph-Based Encoding of Spatial and Temporal Relations: The model utilizes two distinct graphs — spatial relationships informed by anatomical proximities and temporal interactions derived from the BOLD dynamics. This dual-graph approach ensures that BrainODE considers both the temporal dynamics secured in latent initial states and spatial relations, providing a more robust representation of brain activities.
  3. Continuous Representation with ODE: Utilizing a generative model based on ODEs facilitates decoding continuous time series data, offering a refined structure to the BOLD signals and an enhanced insight toward subsequent clinical predictions.

Empirical validation includes robust experimental results using real-world neuroimaging datasets, ABIDE and ABCD. When compared to existing approaches, BrainODE achieves a notable increase (avg. 27.4% in AUC for ABIDE and 15.6% for ABCD) in classification accuracies for clinical predictions. This underscores its efficacy in enhancing the quality of brain signal modeling beyond existing interpolation and recurrent methods.

The introduction of BrainODE provisions a significant advancement in how dynamic brain signals can be handled methodologically. The ability of BrainODE to predict clinical outcomes highlights its potential impact in neurological diagnostics and therapeutic strategies. This approach not only provides superior data preprocessing but could also imply deeper understanding in neuroscientific research, particularly in disorders like Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).

Going forward, there are several potential frontiers for the continued development of BrainODE. Future research might explore advanced dynamic models of temporal graphs or delve into integration with structural connectivity data from Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI). Additionally, there is room to adapt BrainODE for more comprehensive examination across various types of brain signals beyond fMRI, potentially paving the way for unprecedented strides in personalizing clinical interventions.

In summary, BrainODE represents a significant step in the preprocessing of neuroimaging data, advancing brain network analyses and addressing critical gaps in neuro-clinical applications. The results advocate for its use in ethically responsible academic research, with a caveat to safeguard against any non-academic exploitation due to its potent applicability in interfacing with clinical outcomes.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com