Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Visual Fact Checker: Enabling High-Fidelity Detailed Caption Generation (2404.19752v1)

Published 30 Apr 2024 in cs.CV
Visual Fact Checker: Enabling High-Fidelity Detailed Caption Generation

Abstract: Existing automatic captioning methods for visual content face challenges such as lack of detail, content hallucination, and poor instruction following. In this work, we propose VisualFactChecker (VFC), a flexible training-free pipeline that generates high-fidelity and detailed captions for both 2D images and 3D objects. VFC consists of three steps: 1) proposal, where image-to-text captioning models propose multiple initial captions; 2) verification, where a LLM utilizes tools such as object detection and VQA models to fact-check proposed captions; 3) captioning, where an LLM generates the final caption by summarizing caption proposals and the fact check verification results. In this step, VFC can flexibly generate captions in various styles following complex instructions. We conduct comprehensive captioning evaluations using four metrics: 1) CLIP-Score for image-text similarity; 2) CLIP-Image-Score for measuring the image-image similarity between the original and the reconstructed image generated by a text-to-image model using the caption. 3) human study on Amazon Mechanical Turk; 4) GPT-4V for fine-grained evaluation. Evaluation results show that VFC outperforms state-of-the-art open-sourced captioning methods for 2D images on the COCO dataset and 3D assets on the Objaverse dataset. Our study demonstrates that by combining open-source models into a pipeline, we can attain captioning capability comparable to proprietary models such as GPT-4V, despite being over 10x smaller in model size.

PDF HTML Abstract

Exploring Visual Fact Checker: A Training-Free Pipeline for Detailed 2D and 3D Captioning

Introduction to VisualFactChecker (VFC)

In the landscape of image and 3D object captioning, traditional methods often grapple with challenges like hallucination (where the model creates fictitious details) and overly vague outputs. Addressing these issues, the VisualFactChecker (VFC) emerges as a versatile, training-free solution designed to enhance the accuracy and detail of captions for both 2D images and 3D objects.

VFC operates through a three-stage process:

  1. Proposal: Utilizes image-to-text models to generate several initial caption options.
  2. Verification: Leverages LLMs alongside object detection and visual question answering (VQA) models to verify the accuracy of these captions.
  3. Captioning: The LLM synthesizes the verified information to produce the final detailed and accurate caption.

By harnessing a combination of open-source models linked by an LLM, VFC demonstrates capabilities comparable to proprietary systems like GPT-4V, yet with significantly smaller model size.

Breaking Down the Pipeline

The innovation of VFC lies in its layered approach combining multiple technologies:

  • Proposer: Acts as the first filter, generating descriptive captions that might still hold inaccuracies.
  • Verifier: Utilizes tools to check these descriptions against the actual image content, targeting detailed accuracy by confirming or denying elements present in the captions.
  • Caption Composer: Integrates all verified information to produce the final output that adheres not only to factual correctness but also to the specified writing style or instructional focus.

Superior Performance with Insights on Metrics

VFC's effectiveness isn't just theoretical; it's quantitatively backed by robust metrics:

  • CLIP-Score and CLIP-Image-Score: These metrics confirm that VFC outperforms existing open-source captioning methods. Notably, the novel CLIP-Image-Score evaluates how well a caption describes an image by comparing the original image to one recreated from the caption itself, highlighting discrepancies and confirming accuracy.
  • Human Studies and GPT-4V Evaluations: Beyond automated metrics, human assessments via Amazon Mechanical Turk and detailed evaluations using GPT-4V further emphasize the reliability and detail orientation of VFC's captioning capability.

Future Implications and Developments

The methodology setup by VFC points to a promising direction for both practical applications and theoretical AI research:

  • Enhanced Accessibility: Accurate descriptions can significantly improve accessibility for those with visual impairments, providing detailed comprehension of visual content.
  • Richer Data Interactions: In scenarios where detailed object descriptions are crucial, like virtual reality (VR) or online shopping, VFC could provide a more engaging and informative user experience.
  • Foundation for Future Research: As a modular system, VFC offers a framework for integrating newer models or enhancing specific components like the proposer or verifier, continuously evolving with AI advancements.

Final Thoughts

The VisualFactChecker stands as a noteworthy development in the sphere of AI-driven captioning, displaying not only high fidelity in its outputs but also versatility across different formats like 2D and 3D. It bridges the gap between detailed visual understanding and natural language processing, paving the way for more immersive and accessible digital experiences. Its open-source nature combined with the effectiveness comparable to larger proprietary models presents a valuable tool for researchers and developers looking to push the boundaries of multimodal AI interactions.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (39)
  1. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. In NeurIPS, 2022.
  2. Bottom-up and top-down attention for image captioning and visual question answering. In CVPR, 2018.
  3. Improving image generation with better captions. Technical report, OpenAI, 2023.
  4. Improving image captioning descriptiveness by ranking and llm-based fusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11593, 2023.
  5. Language models are few-shot learners. In NeurIPS, 2020.
  6. Ic3: Image captioning by committee consensus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01328, 2023.
  7. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311, 2022.
  8. Instructblip: Towards general-purpose vision-language models with instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06500, 2023.
  9. Objaverse: A universe of annotated 3d objects. In CVPR, 2023.
  10. Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description. In CVPR, 2015.
  11. Detecting and preventing hallucinations in large vision language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06394, 2023.
  12. Clipscore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08718, 2021.
  13. Promptcap: Prompt-guided task-aware image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09699, 2022.
  14. Attention on attention for image captioning. In ICCV, 2019.
  15. Are these the same apple? comparing images based on object intrinsics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00750, 2023.
  16. Blip: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training for unified vision-language understanding and generation. In ICML, 2022.
  17. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12597, 2023a.
  18. Evaluating object hallucination in large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10355, 2023b.
  19. Aligning large multi-modal model with robust instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14565, 2023a.
  20. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03744, 2023b.
  21. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08485, 2023c.
  22. Evaluation and mitigation of agnosia in multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.04041, 2023.
  23. Scalable 3d captioning with pretrained models. In NeurIPS, 2023a.
  24. Scalable 3d captioning with pretrained models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.07279, 2023b.
  25. Clipcap: Clip prefix for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09734, 2021.
  26. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2023.
  27. Kosmos-2: Grounding multimodal large language models to the world. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14824, 2023.
  28. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023.
  29. Mvdream: Multi-view diffusion for 3d generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16512, 2023.
  30. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239, 2022.
  31. Plug-and-play vqa: Zero-shot vqa by conjoining large pretrained models with zero training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08773, 2022.
  32. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  33. Vigc: Visual instruction generation and correction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12714, 2023a.
  34. Evaluation and analysis of hallucination in large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15126, 2023b.
  35. Ofa: Unifying architectures, tasks, and modalities through a simple sequence-to-sequence learning framework. In ICML, 2022.
  36. Visual clues: Bridging vision and language foundations for image paragraph captioning. In NeurIPS, 2022.
  37. Socratic models: Composing zero-shot multimodal reasoning with language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.00598, 2022.
  38. Chatgpt asks, blip-2 answers: Automatic questioning towards enriched visual descriptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06594, 2023a.
  39. Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023b.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Yunhao Ge (29 papers)
  2. Xiaohui Zeng (28 papers)
  3. Jacob Samuel Huffman (1 paper)
  4. Tsung-Yi Lin (49 papers)
  5. Ming-Yu Liu (87 papers)
  6. Yin Cui (45 papers)
Citations (6)
View on Semantic Scholar
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube