Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
132 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Unraveling the Italian and English Telegram Conspiracy Spheres through Message Forwarding (2404.18602v1)

Published 29 Apr 2024 in cs.SI

Abstract: Telegram has grown into a significant platform for news and information sharing, favored for its anonymity and minimal moderation. This openness, however, makes it vulnerable to misinformation and conspiracy theories. In this study, we explore the dynamics of conspiratorial narrative dissemination within Telegram, focusing on Italian and English landscapes. In particular, we leverage the mechanism of message forwarding within Telegram and collect two extensive datasets through snowball strategy. We adopt a network-based approach and build the Italian and English Telegram networks to reveal their respective communities. By employing topic modeling, we uncover distinct narratives and dynamics of misinformation spread. Results highlight differences between Italian and English conspiracy landscapes, with Italian discourse involving assorted conspiracy theories and alternative news sources intertwined with legitimate news sources, whereas English discourse is characterized by a more focused approach on specific narratives such as QAnon and political conspiracies. Finally, we show that our methodology exhibits robustness across initial seed selections, suggesting broader applicability. This study contributes to understanding information and misinformation spread on Italian and English Telegram ecosystems through the mechanism of message forwarding

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (42)
  1. A. Tirado-García, “The negative campaign on telegram: The political use of criticism during the 2021 community of madrid elections,” Social sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 93, 2023.
  2. M. Júnior, P. Melo, A. P. C. da Silva, F. Benevenuto, and J. Almeida, “Towards understanding the use of telegram by political groups in brazil,” in Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, 2021, pp. 237–244.
  3. A. Cavalini, F. Malini, F. Gouveia, and G. Comarela, “Politics and disinformation: Analyzing the use of telegram’s information disorder network in brazil for political mobilization,” First Monday, 2023.
  4. S. Walther and A. McCoy, “Us extremism on telegram,” Perspectives on Terrorism, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 100–124, 2021.
  5. L. H. X. Ng and J. Y. Loke, “Analyzing public opinion and misinformation in a covid-19 telegram group chat,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 84–91, 2020.
  6. C. Curley, E. Siapera, and J. Carthy, “Covid-19 protesters and the far right on telegram: Co-conspirators or accidental bedfellows?” Social Media+ Society, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 20563051221129187, 2022.
  7. S. Tardelli, M. Avvenuti, G. Cola, S. Cresci, T. Fagni, M. Gambini, L. Mannocci, M. Mazza, C. Senette, and M. Tesconi, “Cyber intelligence and social media analytics: Current research trends and challenges,” Proceedings of the 2nd CINI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Ital-IA 2022), 2022.
  8. M. Zehring and E. Domahidi, “German corona protest mobilizers on telegram and their relations to the far right: A network and topic analysis,” Social Media+ Society, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 20563051231155106, 2023.
  9. J. Xu and B. Livshits, “The anatomy of a cryptocurrency {{\{{Pump-and-Dump}}\}} scheme,” in 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19), 2019, pp. 1609–1625.
  10. L. Nizzoli, S. Tardelli, M. Avvenuti, S. Cresci, M. Tesconi, and E. Ferrara, “Charting the landscape of online cryptocurrency manipulation,” IEEE access, vol. 8, pp. 113 230–113 245, 2020.
  11. P. Jost and L. Dogruel, “Radical mobilization in times of crisis: Use and effects of appeals and populist communication features in telegram channels,” Social Media+ Society, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 20563051231186372, 2023.
  12. M. Hoseini, P. Melo, F. Benevenuto, A. Feldmann, and S. Zannettou, “On the globalization of the qanon conspiracy theory through telegram,” in Proceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 2023, 2023, pp. 75–85.
  13. A. Urman, J. C.-t. Ho, and S. Katz, “Analyzing protest mobilization on telegram: The case of 2019 anti-extradition bill movement in hong kong,” Plos one, vol. 16, no. 10, p. e0256675, 2021.
  14. H. Schulze, J. Hohner, S. Greipl, M. Girgnhuber, I. Desta, and D. Rieger, “Far-right conspiracy groups on fringe platforms: A longitudinal analysis of radicalization dynamics on telegram,” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1103–1126, 2022.
  15. A. Anderson, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, J. Leskovec, and M. Tiwari, “Global diffusion via cascading invitations: Structure, growth, and homophily,” in Proceedings of the 24th international conference on World Wide Web, 2015, pp. 66–76.
  16. M. L. Morgia, A. Mei, and A. M. Mongardini, “Tgdataset: a collection of over one hundred thousand telegram channels,” 2023.
  17. T. Willaert, “A computational analysis of telegram’s narrative affordances,” Plos one, vol. 18, no. 11, p. e0293508, 2023.
  18. A. Bovet and P. Grindrod, “Organization and evolution of the uk far-right network on telegram,” Applied Network Science, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 76, 2022.
  19. J. Baumgartner, S. Zannettou, M. Squire, and J. Blackburn, “The pushshift telegram dataset,” in Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, vol. 14, 2020, pp. 840–847.
  20. A. Urman and S. Katz, “What they do in the shadows: examining the far-right networks on telegram,” Information, communication & society, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 904–923, 2022.
  21. M. Glenski, E. Saldanha, and S. Volkova, “Characterizing speed and scale of cryptocurrency discussion spread on reddit,” in The World Wide Web Conference, 2019, pp. 560–570.
  22. M. Avalle, N. Di Marco, G. Etta, E. Sangiorgio, S. Alipour, A. Bonetti, L. Alvisi, A. Scala, A. Baronchelli, M. Cinelli, and W. Quattrociocchi, “Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time,” Nature, 2024.
  23. A. Calamusa, S. Tardelli, M. Avvenuti, S. Cresci, I. Federigi, M. Tesconi, M. Verani, and A. Carducci, “Twitter monitoring evidence of covid-19 infodemic in italy,” European Journal of Public Health, vol. 30, no. Supplement_5, pp. ckaa165–066, 2020.
  24. S. Kim and J. Kim, “Propagation of the qanon conspiracy theory on facebook,” OSF Preprint. https://doi. org/10.31219/osf. io/wku5b, 2021.
  25. K. Engel, Y. Hua, T. Zeng, and M. Naaman, “Characterizing reddit participation of users who engage in the qanon conspiracy theories,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 6, no. CSCW1, pp. 1–22, 2022.
  26. M. Gambini, S. Tardelli, and M. Tesconi, “The anatomy of conspiracy theorists: Unveiling traits using a comprehensive twitter dataset,” Computer Communications, vol. 217, pp. 25–40, 2024.
  27. M. Vergani, A. Martinez Arranz, R. Scrivens, and L. Orellana, “Hate speech in a telegram conspiracy channel during the first year of the covid-19 pandemic,” Social Media+ Society, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 20563051221138758, 2022.
  28. J. Davey and D. Weinberg, “Inspiration and influence: Discussions of the us military in extreme right-wing telegram channels,” Institute for Strategic Dialogue, 2021.
  29. K. Greer and S. Beene, “When belief becomes research: conspiracist communities on the social web,” Frontiers in Communication, vol. 9, p. 1345973, 2024.
  30. M. Tuters and T. Willaert, “Deep state phobia: Narrative convergence in coronavirus conspiracism on instagram,” Convergence, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1214–1238, 2022.
  31. G. Spitale, N. Biller-Andorno, and F. Germani, “Concerns around opposition to the green pass in italy: social listening analysis by using a mixed methods approach,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 24, no. 2, p. e34385, 2022.
  32. I. V. Pasquetto, A. F. Olivieri, L. Tacchetti, G. Riotta, and A. Spada, “Disinformation as infrastructure: Making and maintaining the qanon conspiracy on italian digital media,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 6, no. CSCW1, pp. 1–31, 2022.
  33. N. Dugué and A. Perez, “Direction matters in complex networks: A theoretical and applied study for greedy modularity optimization,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 603, p. 127798, 2022.
  34. R. J. Gallagher, K. Reing, D. Kale, and G. Ver Steeg, “Anchored correlation explanation: Topic modeling with minimal domain knowledge,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 5, pp. 529–542, 2017.
  35. J. E. Uscinski, “The study of conspiracy theories,” Argumenta, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 233–245, 2018.
  36. D. Mahl, M. S. Schäfer, and J. Zeng, “Conspiracy theories in online environments: An interdisciplinary literature review and agenda for future research,” new media & society, p. 14614448221075759, 2022.
  37. L. Dilley, W. Welna, and F. Foster, “Qanon propaganda on twitter as information warfare: Influencers, networks, and narratives,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05118, 2022.
  38. B. A. Martin, P. Chrysochou, C. Strong, D. Wang, and J. Yao, “Dark personalities and bitcoin®: The influence of the dark tetrad on cryptocurrency attitude and buying intention,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 188, p. 111453, 2022.
  39. I. V. Pasquetto, A. F. Olivieri, L. Tacchetti, G. Riotta, and A. Spada, “Disinformation as infrastructure: Making and maintaining the qanon conspiracy on italian digital media,” Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 6, no. CSCW1, apr 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3512931
  40. W. Xu and K. Sasahara, “A network-based approach to qanon user dynamics during COVID-19 infodemic,” CoRR, vol. abs/2111.00537, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.00537
  41. L. van der Maaten and G. Hinton, “Visualizing data using t-sne,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 9, no. 86, pp. 2579–2605, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://jmlr.org/papers/v9/vandermaaten08a.html
  42. S. Tardelli, L. Nizzoli, M. Tesconi, M. Conti, P. Nakov, G. D. S. Martino, and S. Cresci, “Temporal dynamics of coordinated online behavior: Stability, archetypes, and influence,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.06774, 2023.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now