DPER: Diffusion Prior Driven Neural Representation for Limited Angle and Sparse View CT Reconstruction (2404.17890v2)
Abstract: Limited-angle and sparse-view computed tomography (LACT and SVCT) are crucial for expanding the scope of X-ray CT applications. However, they face challenges due to incomplete data acquisition, resulting in diverse artifacts in the reconstructed CT images. Emerging implicit neural representation (INR) techniques, such as NeRF, NeAT, and NeRP, have shown promise in under-determined CT imaging reconstruction tasks. However, the unsupervised nature of INR architecture imposes limited constraints on the solution space, particularly for the highly ill-posed reconstruction task posed by LACT and ultra-SVCT. In this study, we introduce the Diffusion Prior Driven Neural Representation (DPER), an advanced unsupervised framework designed to address the exceptionally ill-posed CT reconstruction inverse problems. DPER adopts the Half Quadratic Splitting (HQS) algorithm to decompose the inverse problem into data fidelity and distribution prior sub-problems. The two sub-problems are respectively addressed by INR reconstruction scheme and pre-trained score-based diffusion model. This combination first injects the implicit image local consistency prior from INR. Additionally, it effectively augments the feasibility of the solution space for the inverse problem through the generative diffusion model, resulting in increased stability and precision in the solutions. We conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate the performance of DPER on LACT and ultra-SVCT reconstruction with two public datasets (AAPM and LIDC), an in-house clinical COVID-19 dataset and a public raw projection dataset created by Mayo Clinic. The results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art reconstruction methods on in-domain datasets, while achieving significant performance improvements on out-of-domain (OOD) datasets.
- G. Wang, H. Yu, and B. De Man, “An outlook on x-ray ct research and development,” Medical physics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1051–1064, 2008.
- M. Katsura, I. Matsuda, M. Akahane, J. Sato, H. Akai, K. Yasaka, A. Kunimatsu, and K. Ohtomo, “Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest ct: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique,” European radiology, vol. 22, pp. 1613–1623, 2012.
- L. Liu, “Model-based iterative reconstruction: a promising algorithm for today’s computed tomography imaging,” Journal of Medical imaging and Radiation sciences, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 131–136, 2014.
- A. H. Andersen and A. C. Kak, “Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (sart): a superior implementation of the art algorithm,” Ultrasonic imaging, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 1984.
- R. Gordon, R. Bender, and G. T. Herman, “Algebraic reconstruction techniques (art) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography,” Journal of theoretical Biology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 471–481, 1970.
- Y. Liu, J. Ma, Y. Fan, and Z. Liang, “Adaptive-weighted total variation minimization for sparse data toward low-dose x-ray computed tomography image reconstruction,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 57, no. 23, p. 7923, 2012.
- Z. Chen, X. Jin, L. Li, and G. Wang, “A limited-angle ct reconstruction method based on anisotropic tv minimization,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 58, no. 7, p. 2119, 2013.
- Y.-L. Sun and J.-X. Tao, “Image reconstruction from few views by l0-norm optimization,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 078703, 2014.
- M. Xu, D. Hu, F. Luo, F. Liu, S. Wang, and W. Wu, “Limited-angle x-ray ct reconstruction using image gradient l0-norm with dictionary learning,” IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 78–87, 2020.
- G. Wang, J. C. Ye, and B. De Man, “Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 737–748, 2020.
- K. H. Jin, M. T. McCann, E. Froustey, and M. Unser, “Deep convolutional neural network for inverse problems in imaging,” IEEE transactions on image processing, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 4509–4522, 2017.
- Y. Han and J. C. Ye, “Framing u-net via deep convolutional framelets: Application to sparse-view ct,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1418–1429, 2018.
- Z. Zhang, X. Liang, X. Dong, Y. Xie, and G. Cao, “A sparse-view ct reconstruction method based on combination of densenet and deconvolution,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1407–1417, 2018.
- H. Lee, J. Lee, H. Kim, B. Cho, and S. Cho, “Deep-neural-network-based sinogram synthesis for sparse-view ct image reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 2018.
- Y. Li, K. Li, C. Zhang, J. Montoya, and G.-H. Chen, “Learning to reconstruct computed tomography images directly from sinogram data under a variety of data acquisition conditions,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2469–2481, 2019.
- Y. Huang, A. Preuhs, G. Lauritsch, M. Manhart, X. Huang, and A. Maier, “Data consistent artifact reduction for limited angle tomography with deep learning prior,” in International workshop on machine learning for medical image reconstruction. Springer, 2019, pp. 101–112.
- B. Zhou, S. K. Zhou, J. S. Duncan, and C. Liu, “Limited view tomographic reconstruction using a cascaded residual dense spatial-channel attention network with projection data fidelity layer,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1792–1804, 2021.
- H. Zhang, B. Liu, H. Yu, and B. Dong, “Metainv-net: Meta inversion network for sparse view ct image reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 621–634, 2020.
- D. Hu, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, S. Luo, and Y. Chen, “Dior: Deep iterative optimization-based residual-learning for limited-angle ct reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1778–1790, 2022.
- Q. Wu, R. Feng, H. Wei, J. Yu, and Y. Zhang, “Self-supervised coordinate projection network for sparse-view computed tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 9, pp. 517–529, 2023.
- Q. Wu, X. Li, H. Wei, J. Yu, and Y. Zhang, “Joint rigid motion correction and sparse-view ct via self-calibrating neural field,” in 2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2023, pp. 1–5.
- D. Rückert, Y. Wang, R. Li, R. Idoughi, and W. Heidrich, “Neat: Neural adaptive tomography,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1–13, 2022.
- R. Zha, Y. Zhang, and H. Li, “Naf: neural attenuation fields for sparse-view cbct reconstruction,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2022: 25th International Conference, Singapore, September 18–22, 2022, Proceedings, Part VI. Springer, 2022, pp. 442–452.
- G. Zang, R. Idoughi, R. Li, P. Wonka, and W. Heidrich, “Intratomo: self-supervised learning-based tomography via sinogram synthesis and prediction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 1960–1970.
- Y. Sun, J. Liu, M. Xie, B. Wohlberg, and U. S. Kamilov, “Coil: Coordinate-based internal learning for tomographic imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 7, pp. 1400–1412, 2021.
- A. W. Reed, H. Kim, R. Anirudh, K. A. Mohan, K. Champley, J. Kang, and S. Jayasuriya, “Dynamic ct reconstruction from limited views with implicit neural representations and parametric motion fields,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 2258–2268.
- L. Shen, J. Pauly, and L. Xing, “Nerp: implicit neural representation learning with prior embedding for sparsely sampled image reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022.
- D. Ulyanov, A. Vedaldi, and V. Lempitsky, “Deep image prior,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2018.
- J. Yoo, K. H. Jin, H. Gupta, J. Yerly, M. Stuber, and M. Unser, “Time-dependent deep image prior for dynamic mri,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3337–3348, 2021.
- K. Gong, C. Catana, J. Qi, and Q. Li, “Pet image reconstruction using deep image prior,” IEEE transactions on medical imaging, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1655–1665, 2018.
- D. O. Baguer, J. Leuschner, and M. Schmidt, “Computed tomography reconstruction using deep image prior and learned reconstruction methods,” Inverse Problems, vol. 36, no. 9, p. 094004, 2020.
- N. Rahaman, A. Baratin, D. Arpit, F. Draxler, M. Lin, F. Hamprecht, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, “On the spectral bias of neural networks,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2019, pp. 5301–5310.
- Y. Song, L. Shen, L. Xing, and S. Ermon, “Solving inverse problems in medical imaging with score-based generative models,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
- H. Chung, B. Sim, D. Ryu, and J. C. Ye, “Improving diffusion models for inverse problems using manifold constraints,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 25 683–25 696, 2022.
- H. Chung, D. Ryu, M. T. McCann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, “Solving 3d inverse problems using pre-trained 2d diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 22 542–22 551.
- H. Chung, B. Sim, and J. C. Ye, “Come-closer-diffuse-faster: Accelerating conditional diffusion models for inverse problems through stochastic contraction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 12 413–12 422.
- C. Peng, P. Guo, S. K. Zhou, V. M. Patel, and R. Chellappa, “Towards performant and reliable undersampled mr reconstruction via diffusion model sampling,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, 2022, pp. 623–633.
- L. I. Rudin, S. Osher, and E. Fatemi, “Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms,” Physica D: nonlinear phenomena, vol. 60, no. 1-4, pp. 259–268, 1992.
- M. Tancik, P. Srinivasan, B. Mildenhall, S. Fridovich-Keil, N. Raghavan, U. Singhal, R. Ramamoorthi, J. Barron, and R. Ng, “Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 7537–7547, 2020.
- T. Müller, A. Evans, C. Schied, and A. Keller, “Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding,” ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2022.
- D. Geman and C. Yang, “Nonlinear image recovery with half-quadratic regularization,” IEEE transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 932–946, 1995.
- Y. Zhu, K. Zhang, J. Liang, J. Cao, B. Wen, R. Timofte, and L. Van Gool, “Denoising diffusion models for plug-and-play image restoration,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 1219–1229.
- H. E. Robbins, “An empirical bayes approach to statistics,” in Breakthroughs in Statistics: Foundations and basic theory. Springer, 1992, pp. 388–394.
- Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020.
- B. Kawar, M. Elad, S. Ermon, and J. Song, “Denoising diffusion restoration models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 23 593–23 606, 2022.
- H. Chung, J. Kim, M. T. Mccann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, “Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
- Y. Wang, J. Yu, and J. Zhang, “Zero-shot image restoration using denoising diffusion null-space model,” in The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
- C. H. McCollough, A. C. Bartley, R. E. Carter, B. Chen, T. A. Drees, P. Edwards, D. R. Holmes III, A. E. Huang, F. Khan, S. Leng et al., “Low-dose ct for the detection and classification of metastatic liver lesions: results of the 2016 low dose ct grand challenge,” Medical physics, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. e339–e352, 2017.
- S. G. Armato III, G. McLennan, L. Bidaut, M. F. McNitt-Gray, C. R. Meyer, A. P. Reeves, B. Zhao, D. R. Aberle, C. I. Henschke, E. A. Hoffman et al., “The lung image database consortium (lidc) and image database resource initiative (idri): a completed reference database of lung nodules on ct scans,” Medical physics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 915–931, 2011.
- D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
- N. Müller, Y. Siddiqui, L. Porzi, S. R. Bulo, P. Kontschieder, and M. Nießner, “Diffrf: Rendering-guided 3d radiance field diffusion,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 4328–4338.
- J. Gu, A. Trevithick, K.-E. Lin, J. M. Susskind, C. Theobalt, L. Liu, and R. Ramamoorthi, “Nerfdiff: Single-image view synthesis with nerf-guided distillation from 3d-aware diffusion,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 11 808–11 826.
- Chenhe Du (4 papers)
- Xiyue Lin (5 papers)
- Qing Wu (39 papers)
- Xuanyu Tian (6 papers)
- Ying Su (42 papers)
- Zhe Luo (12 papers)
- Hongjiang Wei (28 papers)
- S. Kevin Zhou (165 papers)
- Jingyi Yu (171 papers)
- Yuyao Zhang (52 papers)
- Rui Zheng (79 papers)
- Yang Chen (535 papers)