Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
86 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
51 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
22 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
34 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
83 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
91 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
471 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
203 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Asymptotically Fair and Truthful Allocation of Public Goods (2404.15996v2)

Published 24 Apr 2024 in cs.GT

Abstract: We study the fair and truthful allocation of m divisible public items among n agents, each with distinct preferences for the items. To aggregate agents' preferences fairly, we focus on finding a core solution. For divisible items, a core solution always exists and can be calculated by maximizing the Nash welfare objective. However, such a solution is easily manipulated; agents might have incentives to misreport their preferences. To mitigate this, the current state-of-the-art finds an approximate core solution with high probability while ensuring approximate truthfulness. However, this approach has two main limitations. First, due to several approximations, the approximation error in the core could grow with n, resulting in a non-asymptotic core solution. This limitation is particularly significant as public-good allocation mechanisms are frequently applied in scenarios involving a large number of agents, such as the allocation of public tax funds for municipal projects. Second, implementing the current approach for practical applications proves to be a highly nontrivial task. To address these limitations, we introduce PPGA, a (differentially) Private Public-Good Allocation algorithm, and show that it attains asymptotic truthfulness and finds an asymptotic core solution with high probability. Additionally, to demonstrate the practical applicability of our algorithm, we implement PPGA and empirically study its properties using municipal participatory budgeting data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations and Trends® in Machine learning 3, 1 (2011), 1–122.
  2. Stephen P Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe. 2004. Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Fair public decision making. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC). 629–646.
  4. Privacy and truthful equilibrium selection for aggregative games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE). 286–299.
  5. Gerard Debreu and Herbert Scarf. 1963. A limit theorem on the core of an economy. International Economic Review 4, 3 (1963), 235–246.
  6. Steven Diamond and Stephen Boyd. 2016. CVXPY: A Python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 17, 1 (2016), 2909–2913.
  7. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Theory of Cryptography (TCC). 265–284.
  8. Cynthia Dwork and Aaron Roth. 2014. The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. Theoretical Computer Science 9, 3-4 (2014), 211–407.
  9. The core of the participatory budgeting problem. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE). 384–399.
  10. Fair allocation of indivisible public goods. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC). 575–592.
  11. Participatory budgeting: Data, tools, and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11035 (2023).
  12. Fair knapsack. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Vol. 33. 1941–1948.
  13. Duncan K Foley. 1970. Lindahl’s Solution and the Core of an Economy with Public Goods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 38, 1 (1970), 66–72.
  14. Truthful aggregation of budget proposals. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC). 751–752.
  15. Daniel Gabay and Bertrand Mercier. 1976. A dual algorithm for the solution of nonlinear variational problems via finite element approximation. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 2, 1 (1976), 17–40.
  16. Donald Bruce Gillies. 1953. Some theorems on n-person games. Princeton University.
  17. Roland Glowinski and Americo Marroco. 1975. Sur l’approximation, par éléments finis d’ordre un, et la résolution, par pénalisation-dualité d’une classe de problèmes de Dirichlet non linéaires. Revue française d’automatique, informatique, recherche opérationnelle. Analyse numérique 9, R2 (1975), 41–76.
  18. Knapsack voting for participatory budgeting. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (TEAC) 7, 2 (2019), 1–27.
  19. Bingsheng He and Xiaoming Yuan. 2012. On the O(1/n) Convergence Rate of the Douglas-Rachford Alternating Direction Method. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50, 2 (2012), 700–709.
  20. Magnus R Hestenes. 1969. Multiplier and gradient methods. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 4, 5 (1969), 303–320.
  21. Private matchings and allocations. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). 21–30.
  22. Jointly private convex programming. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). 580–599.
  23. DP-ADMM: ADMM-based distributed learning with differential privacy. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 15 (2019), 1002–1012.
  24. Differentially private distributed optimization. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking. 1–10.
  25. Zhiyi Huang and Xue Zhu. 2018. Near optimal jointly private packing algorithms via dual multiplicative weight update. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). 343–357.
  26. Zhiyi Huang and Xue Zhu. 2019. Scalable and Jointly Differentially Private Packing. (2019).
  27. Towards practical differentially private convex optimization. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE, 299–316.
  28. László Lovász and Santosh Vempala. 2007. The geometry of logconcave functions and sampling algorithms. Random Structures & Algorithms 30, 3 (2007), 307–358.
  29. Frank McSherry and Kunal Talwar. 2007. Mechanism design via differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 94–103.
  30. Ilya Mironov. 2017. Rényi differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF). 263–275.
  31. Thomas J Muench. 1972. The core and the Lindahl equilibrium of an economy with a public good: An example. Journal of Economic Theory 4, 2 (1972), 241–255.
  32. Approximate Core for Committee Selection via Multilinear Extension and Market Clearing. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). 2229–2252.
  33. Proportional participatory budgeting with additive utilities. Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2021), 12726–12737.
  34. Michael JD Powell. 1969. A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems. Optimization (1969), 283–298.
  35. Ariel D Procaccia. 2013. Cake cutting: Not just child’s play. Commun. ACM 56, 7 (2013), 78–87.
  36. Ariel D Procaccia and Moshe Tennenholtz. 2009. Approximate mechanism design without money. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). 177–186.
  37. Herbert E Scarf. 1967. The core of an N person game. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society (1967), 50–69.
  38. On the linear convergence of the ADMM in decentralized consensus optimization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 62, 7 (2014), 1750–1761.
  39. Robert L Smith. 1984. Efficient Monte Carlo procedures for generating points uniformly distributed over bounded regions. Operations Research 32, 6 (1984), 1296–1308.
  40. Pabulib: A Participatory Budgeting Library. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.06539 (2020).
  41. Roman Vershynin. 2018. High-dimensional probability: An introduction with applications in data science. Vol. 47. Cambridge University Press.
  42. Tao Zhang and Quanyan Zhu. 2016. Dynamic differential privacy for ADMM-based distributed classification learning. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 12, 1 (2016), 172–187.
  43. Improving the privacy and accuracy of ADMM-based distributed algorithms. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). 5796–5805.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets