Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
120 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
55 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Deep Predictive Model Learning with Parametric Bias: Handling Modeling Difficulties and Temporal Model Changes (2404.15726v1)

Published 24 Apr 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: When a robot executes a task, it is necessary to model the relationship among its body, target objects, tools, and environment, and to control its body to realize the target state. However, it is difficult to model them using classical methods if the relationship is complex. In addition, when the relationship changes with time, it is necessary to deal with the temporal changes of the model. In this study, we have developed Deep Predictive Model with Parametric Bias (DPMPB) as a more human-like adaptive intelligence to deal with these modeling difficulties and temporal model changes. We categorize and summarize the theory of DPMPB and various task experiments on the actual robots, and discuss the effectiveness of DPMPB.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. H. Kobayashi, K. Hyodo, and D. Ogane, “On Tendon-Driven Robotic Mechanisms with Redundant Tendons,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 561–571, 1998.
  2. C. C. Kemp and A. Edsinger, “Robot manipulation of human tools: Autonomous detection and control of task relevant features,” in Proceeding of the 2006 International Conference on Development and Learning, 2006, pp. 1–6.
  3. C. Lee, M. Kim, Y. J. Kim, N. Hong, S. Ryu, H. J. Kim, and S. Kim, “Soft robot review,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 2017.
  4. D. Tanaka, S. Arnold, and K. Yamazaki, “EMD Net: An Encode-Manipulate-Decode Network for Cloth Manipulation,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1771–1778, 2018.
  5. Y. Kuniyoshi and S. Suzuki, “Dynamic emergence and adaptation of behavior through embodiment as coupled chaotic field,” in Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004, pp. 2042–2049.
  6. J. Lee, J. Hwangbo, L. Wellhausen, V. Koltun, and M. Hutter, “Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain,” Science Robotics, vol. 5, no. 47, 2020.
  7. K. Kawaharazuka, K. Tsuzuki, M. Onitsuka, Y. Asano, K. Okada, K. Kawasaki, and M. Inaba, “Object Recognition, Dynamic Contact Simulation, Detection, and Control of the Flexible Musculoskeletal Hand Using a Recurrent Neural Network With Parametric Bias,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4580–4587, 2020.
  8. K. Kawaharazuka, N. Kanazawa, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, “Self-Supervised Learning of Visual Servoing for Low-Rigidity Robots Considering Temporal Body Changes,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 7881–7887, 2022.
  9. K. Kawaharazuka, K. Shinjo, Y. Kawamura, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, “Environmentally Adaptive Control Including Variance Minimization Using Stochastic Predictive Network with Parametric Bias: Application to Mobile Robots,” in Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2021, pp. 8381–8387.
  10. K. Kawaharazuka, Y. Kawamura, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, “Imitation Learning with Additional Constraints on Motion Style using Parametric Bias,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5897–5904, 2021.
  11. K. Kawaharazuka, Y. Ribayashi, A. Miki, Y. Toshimitsu, T. Suzuki, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, “Learning of Balance Controller Considering Changes in Body State for Musculoskeletal Humanoids,” in Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2022, pp. 5809–5816.
  12. K. Kawaharazuka, A. Miki, M. Bando, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, “Dynamic Cloth Manipulation Considering Variable Stiffness and Material Change Using Deep Predictive Model With Parametric Bias,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 16, pp. 1–16, 2022.
  13. J. Tani, “Self-organization of behavioral primitives as multiple attractor dynamics: a robot experiment,” in Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2002, pp. 489–494.
  14. T. Ogata, H. Ohba, J. Tani, K. Komatani, and H. G. Okuno, “Extracting multi-modal dynamics of objects using RNNPB,” in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005, pp. 966–971.
  15. R. Tedrake, T. W. Zhang, and H. S. Seung, “Stochastic policy gradient reinforcement learning on a simple 3D biped,” in Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004, pp. 2849–2854.
  16. T. Zhang, Z. McCarthy, O. Jow, D. Lee, X. Chen, K. Goldberg, and P. Abbeel, “Deep Imitation Learning for Complex Manipulation Tasks from Virtual Reality Teleoperation,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2018, pp. 5628–5635.
  17. Y. Yang, K. Caluwaerts, A. Iscen, T. Zhang, J. Tan, and V. Sindhwani, “Data Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Legged Robots,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Robot Learning, 2019, pp. 1–10.
  18. K. Schmeckpeper, A. Xie, O. Rybkin, S. Tian, K. Daniilidis, S. Levine, and C. Finn, “Learning Predictive Models from Observation and Interaction,” in Proceedings of 2020 European Conference on Computer Vision, 2020, pp. 708–725.
  19. K. Kawaharazuka, T. Ogawa, J. Tamura, and C. Nabeshima, “Dynamic Manipulation of Flexible Objects with Torque Sequence Using a Deep Neural Network,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2019, pp. 2139–2145.
  20. K. Kawaharazuka, K. Tsuzuki, M. Onitsuka, Y. Asano, K. Okada, K. Kawasaki, and M. Inaba, “Musculoskeletal AutoEncoder: A Unified Online Acquisition Method of Intersensory Networks for State Estimation, Control, and Simulation of Musculoskeletal Humanoids,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2411–2418, 2020.
  21. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,” Neural computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997.
  22. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015, pp. 1–15.
  23. K. Kawaharazuka, S. Makino, K. Tsuzuki, M. Onitsuka, Y. Nagamatsu, K. Shinjo, T. Makabe, Y. Asano, K. Okada, K. Kawasaki, and M. Inaba, “Component Modularized Design of Musculoskeletal Humanoid Platform Musashi to Investigate Learning Control Systems,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2019, pp. 7294–7301.
  24. K. Kawaharazuka, K. Tsuzuki, S. Makino, M. Onitsuka, K. Shinjo, Y. Asano, K. Okada, K. Kawasaki, and M. Inaba, “Task-specific Self-body Controller Acquisition by Musculoskeletal Humanoids: Application to Pedal Control in Autonomous Driving,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2019, pp. 813–818.

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel DPMPB framework that integrates neural network prediction with a real-time updating parametric bias to manage temporal model changes.
  • It employs dual operational modes for state and control transitions, enhancing flexibility for modeling complex robot-environment interactions.
  • Experimental validation shows effective manipulation of soft materials, adaptive visual feedback, and imitation learning, underlining its practical utility.

Overview of the Deep Predictive Model with Parametric Bias for Complex Robot Task Execution

Introduction to DPMPB

The Deep Predictive Model with Parametric Bias (DPMPB) is developed to address the complex and dynamic relationships between a robot's body, its environment, and the objects it interacts with. Traditional modeling approaches struggle to capture these dynamics, especially as they change over time due to factors like wear or environmental shifts. DPMPB integrates a predictive modeling framework using neural networks with a unique element, the parametric bias (PB), which adapts to temporal changes by embedding dynamic information directly into the model.

Key Features of DPMPB

DPMPB utilizes a neural network architecture to predict sensor and actuator states based on learned relationships within the robot's operational context. The significant aspects include:

  • Modeling Flexibility: Capability to model non-rigid interactions between the robot and its environment.
  • Adaptive Bias: The parametric bias component updates in real-time, allowing the model to adapt to new or changing conditions without full retraining.
  • Dual Mode Operation: It operates in two modes, a state transition model (STM) and a control transition model (CTM), catering to both predictive and control-oriented applications.

Experimental Validation

The efficacy of DPMPB is demonstrated through various robotics tasks, each highlighting its capacity to handle complexities inherent in real-world applications:

  1. Manipulation Tasks: Effective in scenarios involving interaction with flexible or soft materials.
  2. Visual Feedback: The model adapts to physical changes in robot structure, such as alterations in camera positioning or joint calibration, improving task execution accuracy.
  3. Dynamic Interaction: Exhibits robust performance in tasks requiring real-time adjustments based on immediate sensory feedback.
  4. Imitation Learning: Capable of learning and adapting human-like motions, adjusting the robotic movements according to the observed human operator.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The successful implementation of DPMPB in the described experiments not only validates its theoretical underpinnings but also showcases its practical utility across various robotic platforms. By effectively addressing both modeling difficulties and the ability to adapt to temporal changes, DPMPB sets a foundation for developing more autonomous and adaptive robotic systems.

Future Directions

Despite its successes, there are areas for further development in DPMPB:

  • Enhanced Computation Speed: Reconfiguration for higher control frequencies to suit more dynamic tasks.
  • Broader Application Scope: Expansion to more complex task settings, perhaps incorporating more advanced learning mechanisms or hybrid modeling approaches.
  • Improved Autonomy: Development of mechanisms whereby the system can autonomously evaluate and update its performance criteria based on task success rates and environmental feedback.

Conclusion

DPMPB represents a significant step forward in robotic modeling and control, enabling more nuanced interaction between robots and their operating environments. As robotics systems become increasingly integrated into diverse and changing environments, tools like DPMPB will be crucial for ensuring their effective operation and adaptability. Further research and development will undoubtedly expand its capabilities and applicability, potentially revolutionizing the way robots are deployed in complex scenarios.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com