Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Sequential Outlier Hypothesis Testing under Universality Constraints (2404.14221v5)

Published 22 Apr 2024 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: We revisit sequential outlier hypothesis testing and derive bounds on achievable exponents when both the nominal and anomalous distributions are unknown. The task of outlier hypothesis testing is to identify the set of outliers that are generated from an anomalous distribution among all observed sequences where the rest majority are generated from a nominal distribution. In the sequential setting, one obtains a symbol from each sequence per unit time until a reliable decision could be made. For the case with exactly one outlier, our exponent bounds are tight, providing exact large deviations characterization of sequential tests and strengthening a previous result of Li, Nitinawarat and Veeravalli (2017). In particular, the average sample size of our sequential test is bounded universally under any pair of nominal and anomalous distributions and our sequential test achieves larger Bayesian exponent than the fixed-length test, which could not be guaranteed by the sequential test of Li, Nitinawarat and Veeravalli (2017). For the case with at most one outlier, we propose a threshold-based test that has bounded expected stopping time under mild conditions and we bound the exponential decay rate of error probabilities under each non-null hypothesis and the null hypothesis. Our sequential test resolves the tradeoff among the exponential decay rates of misclassification, false reject and false alarm probabilities for the fixed-length test of Zhou, Wei and Hero (TIT 2022). Finally, with a further step towards practical applications, we generalize our results to the cases of multiple outliers and show that there is a penalty in the error exponents when the number of outliers is unknown.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (13)
  1. Y. Li, S. Nitinawarat, and V. V. Veeravalli, “Universal outlier hypothesis testing,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 4066–4082, 2014.
  2. ——, “Universal sequential outlier hypothesis testing,” Seq. Anal., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 309–344, 2017.
  3. L. Zhou, Y. Wei, and A. O. Hero, “Second-order asymptotically optimal outlier hypothesis testing,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3585–3607, 2022.
  4. Y. Bu, S. Zou, and V. V. Veeravalli, “Linear-complexity exponentially-consistent tests for universal outlying sequence detection,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 2115–2128, 2019.
  5. M. Gutman, “Asymptotically optimal classification for multiple tests with empirically observed statistics,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 401–408, 1989.
  6. L. Zhou, V. Y. F. Tan, and M. Motani, “Second-order asymptotically optimal statistical classification,” Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81–111, 2020.
  7. C. Y. Hsu, C. F. Li, and I. H. Wang, “On universal sequential classification from sequentially observed empirical statistics,” in IEEE ITW, 2022, pp. 642–647.
  8. S. Zou, Y. Liang, H. V. Poor, and X. Shi, “Nonparametric detection of anomalous data streams,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 21, pp. 5785–5797, 2017.
  9. M. Haghifam, V. Y. F. Tan, and A. Khisti, “Sequential classification with empirically observed statistics,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 3095–3113, 2021.
  10. T. Van Erven and P. Harremos, “Rényi divergence and kullback-leibler divergence,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 3797–3820, 2014.
  11. L. Zhou, Y. Wei, and A. Hero, “Asymptotics for outlier hypothesis testing,” in IEEE ISIT, 2022, pp. 3303–3308.
  12. Y. Bu, S. Zou, Y. Liang, and V. V. Veeravalli, “Universal outlying sequence detection for continuous observations,” in IEEE ICASSP, 2016, pp. 4254–4258.
  13. L. Xiong, B. Póczos, and J. Schneider, “Group anomaly detection using flexible genre models,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 24, 2011.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.