Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Network-Level Analysis of Integrated Sensing and Communication Using Stochastic Geometry (2404.13197v1)

Published 19 Apr 2024 in cs.NI

Abstract: To meet the demands of densely deploying communication and sensing devices in the next generation of wireless networks, integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) technology is employed to alleviate spectrum scarcity, while stochastic geometry (SG) serves as a tool for low-complexity performance evaluation. To assess network-level performance, there is a natural interaction between ISAC technology and the SG method. From ISAC network perspective, we illustrate how to leverage SG analytical framework to evaluate ISAC network performance by introducing point process distributions and stochastic fading channel models. From SG framework perspective, we summarize the unique performance metrics and research objectives of ISAC networks, thereby extending the scope of SG research in the field of wireless communications. Additionally, considering the limited discussion in the existing SG-based ISAC works in terms of distribution and channel modeling, a case study is designed to exploit topology and channel fading awareness to provide relevant network insights.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. Q. Huang, B. E. Y. Belmekki, A. M. Eltawil, and M.-S. Alouini, “System-level metrics for non-terrestrial networks under stochastic geometry framework,” IEEE Communications Magazine, 2024, accepted.
  2. Z. Lou, B. E. Y. Belmekki, and M.-S. Alouini, “HAPS in the non-terrestrial network nexus: Prospective architectures and performance insights,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 52–58, 2023.
  3. F. Liu, Y. Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y. C. Eldar, and S. Buzzi, “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond,” IEEE journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022.
  4. A. Salem, C. Masouros, F. Liu, and D. López-Pérez, “Rethinking dense cells for integrated sensing and communications: A stochastic geometric view,” 2022, avaiable online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12942.
  5. H. Ma, Z. Wei, Z. Li, F. Ning, X. Chen, and Z. Feng, “Performance of cooperative detection in joint communication-sensing vehicular network: A data analytic and stochastic geometry approach,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 3848–3863, 2022.
  6. K. S. Ali and M. Chafii, “Integrated sensing and communication for large networks using a dynamic transmission strategy and full duplex,” 2022, avaiable online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09866.
  7. R. Wang, M. A. Kishk, and M.-S. Alouini, “Ultra-dense LEO satellite-based communication systems: A novel modeling technique,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 25–31, 2022.
  8. ——, “Stochastic geometry-based low latency routing in massive LEO satellite networks,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 3881–3894, 2022.
  9. Z. Lou, B. E. Y. Belmekki, and M.-S. Alouini, “Coverage analysis of hybrid RF/THz networks with best relay selection,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1634–1638, 2023.
  10. Z. Fang, Z. Wei, Z. Feng, X. Chen, and Z. Guo, “Performance of joint radar and communication enabled cooperative detection,” in IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC).   IEEE, 2019, pp. 753–758.
  11. D. Ghozlani, A. Omri, S. Bouallegue, H. Chamkhia, and R. Bouallegue, “Stochastic geometry-based analysis of joint radar and communication-enabled cooperative detection systems,” in 17th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).   IEEE, 2021, pp. 325–330.
  12. S. S. Ram, S. Singhal, and G. Ghatak, “Optimization of network throughput of joint radar communication system using stochastic geometry,” Frontiers in Signal Processing, vol. 2, p. 28, 2022.
  13. F. D. S. Moulin, C. Wiame, L. Vandendorpe, and C. Oestges, “Joint performance metrics for integrated sensing and communication systems in automotive scenarios,” 2022, avaiable online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.12790.
  14. N. R. Olson, J. G. Andrews, and R. W. Heath Jr, “Coverage and capacity of joint communication and sensing in wireless networks,” 2022, avaiable online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02289.
  15. W. Chen, L. Li, Z. Chen, B. Ning, G. Wang, and T. Quek, “An ISAC-based beam alignment approach for enhancing terahertz network coverage,” 2022, avaiable online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01728.
  16. C. Skouroumounis, C. Psomas, and I. Krikidis, “FD-JCAS techniques for mmWave HetNets: Ginibre point process modeling and analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4352–4366, 2021.
  17. P. Ren, A. Munari, and M. Petrova, “Performance tradeoffs of joint radar-communication networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 165–168, 2018.
  18. ——, “Performance analysis of a time-sharing joint radar-communications network,” in International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 908–913.
  19. S. J. Maeng, J. Park, and I. Guvenc, “Analysis of UAV radar and communication network coexistence with different multiple access protocols,” 2022, avaiable online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.16614.
  20. R. Wang, M. A. Kishk, and M.-S. Alouini, “Resident population density-inspired deployment of K-tier aerial cellular network,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, pp. 1–1, 2023.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.