Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

An Analysis of Driver-Initiated Takeovers during Assisted Driving and their Effect on Driver Satisfaction (2404.13027v2)

Published 19 Apr 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: During the use of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), drivers can intervene in the active function and take back control due to various reasons. However, the specific reasons for driver-initiated takeovers in naturalistic driving are still not well understood. In order to get more information on the reasons behind these takeovers, a test group study was conducted. There, 17 participants used a predictive longitudinal driving function for their daily commutes and annotated the reasons for their takeovers during active function use. In this paper, the recorded takeovers are analyzed and the different reasons for them are highlighted. The results show that the reasons can be divided into three main categories. The most common category consists of takeovers which aim to adjust the behavior of the ADAS within its Operational Design Domain (ODD) in order to better match the drivers' personal preferences. Other reasons include takeovers due to leaving the ADAS's ODD and corrections of incorrect sensing state information. Using the questionnaire results of the test group study, it was found that the number and frequency of takeovers especially within the ADAS's ODD have a significant negative impact on driver satisfaction. Therefore, the driver satisfaction with the ADAS could be increased by adapting its behavior to the drivers' wishes and thereby lowering the number of takeovers within the ODD. The information contained in the takeover behavior of the drivers could be used as feedback for the ADAS. Finally, it is shown that there are considerable differences in the takeover behavior of different drivers, which shows a need for ADAS individualization.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. W. Morales-Alvarez, O. Sipele, R. Léberon, H. H. Tadjine, and C. Olaverri-Monreal, “Automated driving: A literature review of the take over request in conditional automation,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 12, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/9/12/2087
  2. A. Morando, P. Gershon, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer, “Driver-initiated tesla autopilot disengagements in naturalistic driving,” in 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, ser. AutomotiveUI ’20.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 57–65. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410644
  3. P. Gershon, S. Seaman, B. Mehler, B. Reimer, and J. Coughlin, “Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 158, p. 106217, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457521002487
  4. A. Rydström, M. S. Mullaart, F. Novakazi, M. Johansson, and A. Eriksson, “Drivers’ performance in non-critical take-overs from an automated driving system—an on-road study,” Human Factors, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1841–1857, 2023, pMID: 35212565. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211053460
  5. B. M. Pnina Gershon and B. Reimer, “Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving,” Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 356–361, 2023, pMID: 36988583. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2023.2189990
  6. C. Braunagel, W. Rosenstiel, and E. Kasneci, “Ready for take-over? a new driver assistance system for an automated classification of driver take-over readiness,” IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 10–22, 2017.
  7. S. Yang, A. McKerral, M. D. Mulhall, M. G. Lenné, B. Reimer, and P. Gershon, “Takeover context matters: Characterising context of takeovers in naturalistic driving using super cruise and autopilot,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, ser. AutomotiveUI ’23.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, p. 112–122. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3580585.3606459
  8. L. Fridman, D. E. Brown, M. Glazer, W. Angell, S. Dodd, B. Jenik, J. Terwilliger, A. Patsekin, J. Kindelsberger, L. Ding, S. Seaman, A. Mehler, A. Sipperley, A. Pettinato, B. D. Seppelt, L. Angell, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer, “Mit advanced vehicle technology study: Large-scale naturalistic driving study of driver behavior and interaction with automation,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 102 021–102 038, 2019.
  9. O. Taubman-Ben-Ari, M. Mikulincer, and O. Gillath, “The multidimensional driving style inventory—scale construct and validation,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 323–332, May 2004.
  10. F. Sagberg, Selpi, G. F. Bianchi Piccinini, and J. Engström, “A review of research on driving styles and road safety,” Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1248–1275, June 2015.
  11. M. Hasenjager, M. Heckmann, and H. Wersing, “A survey of personalization for advanced driver assistance systems,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 335–344, June 2020.
  12. M. Kuderer, S. Gulati, and W. Burgard, “Learning driving styles for autonomous vehicles from demonstration,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).   IEEE, May 2015.
  13. W. Wang, J. Xi, and H. Chen, “Modeling and recognizing driver behavior based on driving data: A survey,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, pp. 1–20, 2014.
  14. N. Lin, C. Zong, M. Tomizuka, P. Song, Z. Zhang, and G. Li, “An overview on study of identification of driver behavior characteristics for automotive control,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, pp. 1–15, 2014.
  15. C. Basu, Q. Yang, D. Hungerman, M. Singhal, and A. D. Dragan, “Do you want your autonomous car to drive like you?” in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI ’17.   ACM, Mar. 2017.
  16. N. M. Yusof, J. Karjanto, J. Terken, F. Delbressine, M. Z. Hassan, and M. Rauterberg, “The exploration of autonomous vehicle driving styles: Preferred longitudinal, lateral, and vertical accelerations,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, ser. AutomotiveUI’16.   ACM, Oct. 2016.
  17. S. Griesche, E. Nicolay, D. Assmann, M. Dotzauer, and D. Käthner, “Should my car drive as i do? what kind of driving style do drivers prefer for the design of automated driving functions?” in Proceedings of the 17th Braunschweiger Symposium AAET, 02 2016.
  18. Z. Ma and Y. Zhang, “Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver’s driving styles,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 159, p. 106238, Sept. 2021.
  19. F. Hartwich, M. Beggiato, and J. F. Krems, “Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving – effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity,” Ergonomics, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1017–1032, Feb. 2018.
  20. S. Scherer, A. Dettmann, F. Hartwich, T. Pech, A. C. Bullinger, and G. Wanielik, “How the driver wants to be driven-modelling driving styles in highly automated driving,” in 7. Tagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme, 2015.
  21. L. Vasile, B. Seitz, V. Staab, M. Liebherr, C. Däsch, and D. Schramm, “Influences of personal driving styles and experienced system characteristics on driving style preferences in automated driving,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 15, p. 8855, July 2023.
  22. X. Chen, Y. Zhai, C. Lu, J. Gong, and G. Wang, “A learning model for personalized adaptive cruise control,” in 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).   IEEE, June 2017.
  23. J. D. Lee, S.-Y. Liu, J. Domeyer, and A. DinparastDjadid, “Assessing drivers’ trust of automated vehicle driving styles with a two-part mixed model of intervention tendency and magnitude,” Human Factors, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 197–209, 2021, pMID: 31596618. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819880363

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets