Non-Fine-Tunable Learning to Restrain Task Transferability for Pre-trained Models
Introduction
Pre-trained models, widely utilized for their efficiency in adapting to new tasks via fine-tuning, often present risks of misuse in unethical or harmful applications. Existing protection mechanisms, such as non-transferable learning (NTL), are restricted to impairing model transferability prior to fine-tuning. This paper introduces non-fine-tunable learning, an enhanced framework designed to inhibit the fine-tuning of pre-trained models for predefined undesirable tasks, while maintaining their performance on intended tasks.
Methodology
The proposed learning paradigm comprises two primary objectives:
- Intactness: Preserving model efficiency on original tasks.
- Non-fine-tunability: Ensuring that fine-tuning the model for any restricted task is as difficult, if not more, than training a new model from scratch.
To achieve these goals, the authors propose a framework involving:
- Fine-tuning Simulation: Simulating potential fine-tuning processes an adversary might use, which informs an optimization framework used to train the model.
- Multi-objective Optimization Framework: Balancing model performance on legitimate tasks with resistance to fine-tuning on restricted tasks.
The implementation employs sophisticated loss functions, including inverse cross-entropy and KL divergence from a uniform distribution for classification, and a denial of service loss for generation tasks. These losses ensure the model performs poorly on restricted domain samples while not compromising its capabilities on original tasks.
Experimental Results
Extensive experiments tested the framework across two deep learning modalities (classification and generation), using six distinct model architectures. Results indicate:
- Models protected by the framework exhibited significant resistance to fine-tuning on restricted tasks across various model architectures and fine-tuning strategies.
- Fine-tuning such models requires effort comparable to or greater than training models from scratch, making misuse economically and technically unfeasible.
The robust evaluation also confirmed that the protected models maintain efficacy on their original tasks, affirming the objective of intactness.
Implications and Future Work
This framework introduces a novel approach to safe AI deployment, emphasizing the responsible use of AI technologies. While promising, the approach's efficiency against a broader array of domain adaptation techniques remains to be fully tested. Future research could explore its applicability to other domains, like audio or text, and develop more computationally efficient algorithms to enhance its practical feasibility.
Further investigations might also focus on extending the robustness of non-fine-tunable learning against evolving fine-tuning strategies and exploring how different initialization and optimization strategies affect the non-fine-tunability.
Conclusion
This paper presents an innovative method to enhance the ethical use of pre-trained models by limiting their adaptability to undesirable tasks, without undermining their utility for legitimate applications. The proposed method fosters further exploration into creating AI models that are not only powerful but also aligned with ethical standards and societal norms.