Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

mOthello: When Do Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment and Cross-Lingual Transfer Emerge in Multilingual Models? (2404.12444v1)

Published 18 Apr 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI
mOthello: When Do Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment and Cross-Lingual Transfer Emerge in Multilingual Models?

Abstract: Many pretrained multilingual models exhibit cross-lingual transfer ability, which is often attributed to a learned language-neutral representation during pretraining. However, it remains unclear what factors contribute to the learning of a language-neutral representation, and whether the learned language-neutral representation suffices to facilitate cross-lingual transfer. We propose a synthetic task, Multilingual Othello (mOthello), as a testbed to delve into these two questions. We find that: (1) models trained with naive multilingual pretraining fail to learn a language-neutral representation across all input languages; (2) the introduction of "anchor tokens" (i.e., lexical items that are identical across languages) helps cross-lingual representation alignment; and (3) the learning of a language-neutral representation alone is not sufficient to facilitate cross-lingual transfer. Based on our findings, we propose a novel approach - multilingual pretraining with unified output space - that both induces the learning of language-neutral representation and facilitates cross-lingual transfer.

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment and Transfer in Multilingual Models: Insights from mOthello

Introduction to mOthello

This paper introduces a synthetic task called Multilingual Othello (mOthello) designed to analyze cross-lingual representation alignment and transfer capabilities of pretrained multilingual models. The authors probe several core areas: whether models can develop language-neutral representations through naive multilingual pretraining, the role of "anchor tokens" in facilitating alignment, and if language-neutral representations are alone sufficient to ensure cross-lingual transfer.

Key Findings of the Study

1. Naive Multilingual Pretraining

The research uncovers that models developed under naive multilingual pretraining do not necessarily learn language-neutral representations that generalize across all languages. This finding suggests limited efficacy in naive approaches to developing truly cross-language capable AI models.

2. Role of Anchor Tokens

Introducing anchor tokens — lexical items common across multiple languages — is found to aid significantly in aligning representations across languages. This intervention appears to facilitate better synthesis of language-neutral spaces within models, enhancing the internal consistency of multilingual representations.

3. Insufficiency for Cross-Lingual Transfer

Contrary to common assumptions in the field, the paper presents evidence that the mere presence of language-neutral representations does not guarantee effective cross-lingual transfer capacities. This result implies that other factors or methodologies might be necessary to cultivate robust cross-lingual abilities effectively.

Methodological Innovations

mOthello Task and Cross-Lingual Probing

The adoption of the mOthello artificial task and the deployment of cross-lingual alignment probing represent methodological advancements aimed at better dissecting and understanding model behaviors in a controlled, transparent setting. These approaches allow for precise, clear-cut experiments on language representation and alignment without the many confounders present in natural language processing tasks.

Unified Output Space Training

A novel training framework proposed in the paper is the "unified output space" approach, which not only fosters the learning of shared representations but also significantly enhances cross-lingual transfer capabilities. This method denotes a significant strategy shift that may guide future research in multilingual model training.

Practical Implications

The insights from this paper suggest that practitioners and researchers should reconsider the reliability of traditional multilingual pretraining paradigms. In particular, the reliance on representation alignment alone to foster cross-lingual capabilities might be misguided without the integration of mechanisms like unified output spaces or other innovative methodologies.

Theoretical Contributions

The paper makes substantial theoretical contributions by challenging the previously held belief that alignment of language-neutral representations suffices for cross-lingual transfer. It opens new avenues for exploring the interplay between different types of language-specific and language-neutral training strategies within multilingual contexts.

Future Directions

Given the findings and methodologies introduced, future research could explore the applicability of the unified output space training in more complex, real-world scenarios across diverse multilingual datasets. Additionally, further investigations could also aim to identify other latent factors or training strategies that might complement or enhance the effects observed through anchor tokens and unified output spaces.

In conclusion, this paper not only highlights critical limitations in existing multilingual training paradigms but also sets the stage for more nuanced, effective training frameworks that might better harness the full potential of multilingual models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. Guillaume Alain and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes. In The Fifth International Conference on Learning Representations, Workshop Track Proceedings.
  2. Yonatan Belinkov and James Glass. 2019. Analysis methods in neural language processing: A survey. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:49–72.
  3. Wikipedia entities as rendezvous across languages: Grounding multilingual language models by predicting Wikipedia hyperlinks. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3651–3661, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. The geometry of multilingual language model representations. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 119–136, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  5. Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 8440–8451, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. Emerging cross-lingual structure in pretrained language models. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 6022–6034, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  7. When is BERT multilingual? isolating crucial ingredients for cross-lingual transfer. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3610–3623, Seattle, United States. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  8. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171–4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  9. Philipp Dufter and Hinrich Schütze. 2020. Identifying elements essential for BERT’s multilinguality. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 4423–4437, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  10. Cross-lingual ability of multilingual bert: An empirical study. In The Eighth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  11. Emergent world representations: Exploring a sequence model trained on a synthetic task. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
  12. Tianjian Li and Kenton Murray. 2023. Why does zero-shot cross-lingual generation fail? an explanation and a solution. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 12461–12476, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. On the language neutrality of pre-trained multilingual representations. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 1663–1674, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  14. English intermediate-task training improves zero-shot cross-lingual transfer too. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 10th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 557–575, Suzhou, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  15. How multilingual is multilingual BERT? In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4996–5001, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  16. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9.
  17. What do you learn from context? probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations. In The Sixth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  18. Shijie Wu and Mark Dredze. 2019. Beto, bentz, becas: The surprising cross-lingual effectiveness of BERT. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 833–844, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  19. mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformer. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 483–498, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Tianze Hua (1 paper)
  2. Tian Yun (9 papers)
  3. Ellie Pavlick (66 papers)
Citations (5)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com